SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29 issue2Inclusion as a determinant of poverty in the LGBTI+ community in MexicoNucleosynthesis in the Cosmos: What we think we know and forthcoming questions author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Ciencia ergo sum

On-line version ISSN 2395-8782Print version ISSN 1405-0269

Abstract

SOLOVIEVA, Yulia; QUINTANAR ROJAS, Luis; BALTAZAR RAMOS, Ana María  and  ESCOTTO CORDOVA, Eduardo Alejandro. Vigotsky’s cultural-historical position is not constructivist. Cienc. ergo-sum [online]. 2022, vol.29, n.2, e158.  Epub Oct 20, 2023. ISSN 2395-8782.  https://doi.org/10.30878/ces.v29n2a3.

From a theoretical and methodological perspective, we provide analyses of cultural-historical psychology to identify its differences with constructivism. As well as the origin of psychological development and the usage of “cultural” and “social” terms. The article discusses about the method used in cultural historical psychological approach and its implications for the organization of the teaching-learning process. The authors conclude on the need to differentiate between Vigotsky’s approach and postmodern constructivism according to conceptual, methodological, and epistemological basis.

Keywords : historical-cultural psychology; psychological theories; constructivism; nature of development; methods of analysis in psychology.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish