SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 issue3Adjustable intragastric balloon like treatment for loss weight. Experience in a Mexican centerHepatobiliary ascariasis: case report and literature review author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Endoscopia

On-line version ISSN 2444-6483Print version ISSN 0188-9893

Abstract

PEREZ-MENDOZA, Ariel; JIMENEZ-CORDOBA, Rafael R.; LOPEZ-ALCARAZ, Reyna M.  and  SEPULVEDA-CANAMAR, Francisco J.. Impact of the use of proton pump inhibitors in the endoscopic phenotype of patients with gastroesophageal reflux. Endoscopia [online]. 2019, vol.31, n.3, pp.108-114.  Epub Oct 25, 2021. ISSN 2444-6483.  https://doi.org/10.24875/end.19000021.

Objectives:

To determine whether the frequency of endoscopic phenotypes in gastroesophageal reflux disease is modified in those patients who did not consume proton pump inhibitors (PPI) before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Methods:

A retrospective and comparative study of endoscopic findings (according to Los Angeles Classification) was performed in patients older than 18 years, with predominantly typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux.

Results:

114 patients were evaluated, 56 (49.1%) received PPI before endoscopy and 58 (50.9%) discontinued PPI. There were no differences in age, gender, weight, smoking and alcoholism in both groups. Significant differences were observed in the frequency of esophagitis, it was more frequent in patients who discontinued PPI before the endoscopic procedure (23.2 vs. 41.35%, p < 0.001). In the sub analysis between the grades of esophagitis, the difference was more significant in those with grade B and D (grade A esophagitis: 10.71 vs. 15.51%, p = 0.131; grade B esophagitis: 5.35 vs. 13.79%, p = 0.002; grade C esophagitis: 5.35 vs. 5.17%, p = 0.930; grade D esophagitis: 1.78 vs. 6.89%, p = 0.007). Mild esophagitis (grades A and B) was more frequent in the group without PPI (16.07 vs. 29.31, p = 0.001); this difference was less significant in the group with severe esophagitis (grades C and D) (7.14 vs. 12.06%, p = 0.075).

Conclusions:

The use of PPI before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy seems to modify the endoscopic phenotype in patients with typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Keywords : GERD; Reflux esophagitis; Endoscopy; Non-erosive reflux; PPI.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish