SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11Seroprevalence of Mycobacterium avium subspecie paratuberculosis in suspect cattle slaughtered at slaughterhouse from Sonora, MexicoThe protein and fiber content of tropical forages does not affect its preference by fattening rabbits author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Abanico veterinario

On-line version ISSN 2448-6132Print version ISSN 2007-428X

Abstract

PALACIOS-RODRIGUEZ, Victor; BENITEZ-GUZMAN, Alejandro; MORALES-AGUILAR, Aldo  and  SUAREZ-GUEMES, Francisco. Development and validation of two immunoassays for the detection of Brucella canis in dogs. Abanico vet [online]. 2021, vol.11, e404.  Epub Nov 08, 2021. ISSN 2448-6132.  https://doi.org/10.21929/abavet2021.31.

Canine brucellosis is a cause of reproductive failure and early detection in infected dogs remains a challenge. The aim of the present study was to test two antigens to be used in two different immunoassays for the detection of Brucella canis infection in dogs: one from Brucella canis RM6/66 sonicated crude antigen (CA-iELISA) and the other using the immunodominant protein GroEL (GroEL-iELISA). The cut-off point was determined using sera from infected dogs; subsequently, reproducibility was measured and a coefficient of variation (CV) below 15 % was obtained for negatives and positives with the CA-iELISA, whereas, for the GroEL-iELISA they were higher than 15 %. In the robustness test, there were significant differences for the GroEL-iELISA, but not for the CA-iELISA. The selectivity test showed cross-reactivity with Leptospira interrogans in the CA-iELISA, and with L. interrogans and Salmonella spp. in the GroEL-iELISA. From the sample stability tests, it was demonstrated that samples should be stored at room temperature for no more than 2 hours, at 4 ºC for no more than 24 hours and can be kept at -20 ºC for up to 30 days. Finally, sensitivity and specificity were calculated, resulting in 100 % for both CA-iELISA; sensitivity of 44 % and specificity of 67 % for GroEL-iELISA. In conclusion, the CA-iELSA proved to be better at detecting Brucella canis than the GroEL-iELISA.

Keywords : Brucella canis; Canine Brucellosis; GroEL; ELISA.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English | Spanish