SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 issue2Characterization of patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation in a Tertiary Center: emphasis on complicationsCoronary arteriography with radial access in coronary acute disease and its relation with handgrip strength and radial artery permeability (CARHANG) author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Cardiovascular and metabolic science

On-line version ISSN 2954-3835Print version ISSN 2683-2828

Abstract

LOPEZ VALENCIA, Andrea Janet et al. Major cardiovascular events in failed versus successful coronary revascularization in patients with chronic total occlusion. Cardiovasc. metab. sci [online]. 2021, vol.32, n.2, pp.82-93.  Epub Apr 05, 2024. ISSN 2954-3835.  https://doi.org/10.35366/99745.

Introduction:

Chronic coronary occlusions are associated with a negative impact on long-term prognosis.

Objectives:

To know if there is a difference in major cardiovascular events in patients undergoing successful revascularization versus failed revascularization of chronic total occlusion lesions instable angina.

Material and methods:

Cross-sectional, correlational study with two independent groups.

Results:

71 patients were evaluated, in a context of stable chronic angina, in the High Specialty Medical Unit of Bajio, from January 2013 to February 2020; 41 patients with successful revascularization (RE) and 30 with revascularization was failed (RF). The revascularization success rate was 57.7%. The rate of major cardiovascular events found among patients with RE vs RF in this study were: unstable angina events post-revascularization in 12.5% of the RE group and in 13.3% of the RF group (p = 0.918). AMI (acute myocardial infarction) occurred in 0% of the RE group and in 3.3% of the RF group (p = 0.245). Death of cardiac origin occurred in 0% of the RE group and in 3.3% of the RF group (p = 0.245). In contrast 0% of the RE group and 6.7% of the RF group patients needed new vascularization. The survival rate in RF patients was 96.7%, and in RE patients, it was 100%.

Conclusions:

Successful versus failed revascularization did not show statistically significant differences in the rate of major cardiovascular events.

Keywords : Chronic total occlusion; stable angina; percutaneous coronary intervention; failed revascularization; major cardiovascular events.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English