Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
-
Citado por SciELO
-
Accesos
Links relacionados
-
Similares en SciELO
Compartir
Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas
versión impresa ISSN 2007-0934
Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc vol.12 no.3 Texcoco abr./may. 2021 Epub 02-Mayo-2022
https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v12i3.2343
Articles
Behavior of safflower elite lines high productivity and oil quality in the Yaqui Valley, Sonora, Mexico
1Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro-Departamento de Parasitología. Calzada Antonio Narro núm. 1923, Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, México. (aguilera.nestor@inifap.gob.mx; luisaguirreu@yahoo.com.mx; jabaly1@yahoo.com). CP. 25315.
2Campo Experimental Norman E. Borlaug-INIFAP. Calle Dr. Norman E. Borlaug km 12, Valle del Yaqui, Cajeme, Ciudad Obregón, Sonora, México. CP. 8500. (montoya.lope@inifap.gob.mx).
The safflower Carthamus tinctorius L. it is a crop that has been adopted by a large number of producers, particularly in the Northwest of the country, due to its great adaptability and its little water requirement, due to the great demands presented by the oilseed industry in the country. Since the 1970s it has been worked to generate materials that are highly productive, with good percentage and qualityof oil and with characteristics of resistance to the main diseases present in the region (false mildew and leaf rust). For this reason, the objective of this work was to evaluate the behavior of the elite safflower lines generated by the genetic improvement program in the region (23 oleic and 1 linoleic). These lines were established during cycles 2017-2018 and 2018-2019. Its agronomic behavior was evaluated under the present conditions of the Yaqui Valley. Oleic lines were found that surpassed witnesses Ciano ol and Chey ol, varieties that are widely sown in the region. In addition, it was found that the linoleic type line had better agronomic characteristics, production and oil content than witness RC-1002 which leads to the conclusion that within the evaluated lines there are potential materials to be released as a variety.
Keywords: oilseeds; plant breeding; production
El cártamo Carthamus tinctorius L. es un cultivo que ha sido adoptado por un gran número de productores, particularmente en el Noroeste del país, debido a su gran adaptabilidad y a su poco requerimiento hídrico, a causa de las grandes demandas que presenta la industria de oleaginosas en el país. Desde la década de los 70’s se ha trabajado para generar materiales que sean altamente productivos, con buen porcentaje y calidad de aceite y con características de resistencia a las principales enfermedades presentes en la región (falsa cenicilla y roya de la hoja). Por esto el objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar el comportamiento de las líneas elite de cártamo generadas por el programa de mejoramiento genético en la región (23 oleicas y 1 linoleica). Dichas líneas se establecieron durante los ciclos 2017-2018 y 2018-2019. Se evaluó su comportamiento agronómico bajo las condiciones presentes del Valle del Yaqui. Se encontraron líneas del tipo oleico que superaron a los testigos Ciano ol y Chey ol, variedades que se siembran ampliamente en la región. Además, se encontró que la línea del tipo linoleico presentó mejores características agronómicas, producción y contenido de aceite que el testigo RC-1002 lo cual lleva a concluir que dentro de las líneas evaluadas hay materiales potenciales para ser liberados como variedad.
Palabras clave: fitomejoramiento; oleaginosas; producción
Introduction
The safflower Carthamus tinctorius L. (Asteraceae) is a species that is cultivated worldwide, is native to the Middle East and was traditionally used to produce dyes from its petals. It is currently used for both medicinal and food purposes (Machewad et al., 2012; Asgarpanah and Kasemivash, 2013). Most grain production is used for oil extraction, which is of very good quality and there are two types that contain a high concentration of linoleic acid and those containing oleic acid, which bring benefits for feeding the general population (Borbón et al., 2019).
The main safflower producing countries worldwide are: Kazakhstan, Russia, Mexico and the United States, with production of 196 000, 193 000, 96 000 and 90 000 ton respectively (FAOSTAT, 2019). In the world it is generally cultivated in soils that are scarcely fertile or of low-yield due to the ‘rustic’ conditions that this species presents by this species. However, in southern Sonora due to water deficit conditions, safflower has been adopted by a large number of farmers, who mostly grow it on good quality land (Montoya, 2010). And although Mexico is one of the main world producers of the crop, during 2016 it was only possible to cover 50.5% of the safflower seed required by the national industry (Ramos et al., 2019). Situation that is constant since the 90's (Chanda et al., 1990).
In Mexico the safflower is grown mainly for the production of edible oil and in recent years experiments have been carried out to evaluate its use as silage or fresh forage for cattle and goats (Landau et al., 2004; Reta et al., 2017). The production of this species is concentrated in the north of the country within the states of: Sonora, Baja California and Tamaulipas, with an area of 15 000, 2 600 and 1 910 ha sown.
Safflower cultivation generates 0.11% of the national agricultural GDP and covers 15.31% of the national oilseed production (SAGARPA, 2017; SIAP, 2021), its harvest is completely mechanized and the places where the greatest productivity is presented is where it is irrigated, as is the case of Sonora, where most of this area is concentrated within the Yaqui and Mayo Valleys (Silveira et al., 2009; Ramirez et al., 2017). Being these the most important regions of the state, the Yaqui establishes two cycles in the year, where in autumn-winter the most important crops are wheat and maize and during the summer an important area of soybeans and maize is established depending on the availability by the Yaqui River dam system (Cerutti, 2019).
Safflower is a crop of great importance in northwestern Mexico, thanks to its production capacity with low water levels, compared to wheat cultivation, which predominates in the region; however, due to the effects of climate change there are fewer and fewer water catchments in the Yaqui River dam system (Minjares et al., 2010), it is important to note that some of the water contained in these reservoirs is used for human consumption, by the localities of the Yaqui River basin, in addition the insistence by producers to sow wheat has increasingly reduced the planting area of summer crops such as: soybeans, sorghum, among others. This has caused a water deficit for wheat cultivation (Paquini et al., 2016).
In the Mayo Valley this problem is more evident because this region is not irrigated with the aforementioned dam system, but with the Mocúzari dam that is supplied by the flow from Mayo River, which does not supply to maintain the agricultural area, so it is very common that government programs are registered that promote the sowing of the safflower crop, which is optimal due to its low water requirement (Khalili et al., 2014; Martínez et al., 2016; Singh et al., 2016).
The safflower genetic improvement program started since the 1970s with the aim of identifying materials that adapt to the conditions of the region and present quality and productivity (Quilantán, 1978). Over time, work has been done to generate materials that meet the needs of producers and thanks to this activity it has been possible to release varieties with resistance characteristics to different diseases of global importance such as safflower rust (Puccinia carthami) and Alternaria (Alternaria carthami) (Montoya and Ochoa, 2006).
During the agricultural cycle 2000-2001 in the Yaqui and Mayo Valleys, the disease known as false mildew caused by the fungus R. carthami was presented (Hostert et al., 2006) which during the 2003-2004 cycle presented the greatest damage recorded, during this cycle 107 833 ha had been established in the Valley in the largest area in the last 15 years, of which 2 410 were reported sinister due to the disease (SIAP 2021), it was estimated that in this area the false mildew caused a loss of about 133 000 t equivalent to 440 million pesos, as a result of this, the generation of varieties that presented resistance characteristics and the first results of this work were reflected in 2008 when the first varieties tolerant to this disease were released (Montoya et al., 2008; Montoya, 2010; Bourbon et al., 2011; JLSVVY, 2019).
Over time the planting area of the crop has varied in the state of Sonora, from 2010 the year with the largest area was 2012 with 56 452 ha, followed by 2011 with 45 202 ha, the constant pressure of the disease, as well as the availability of water and the price of crop have led to the lowest area in 2019 with only 13 397 ha planted in the state (Montoya et al., 2008; Ávila et al., 2014; SIAP 2021). In addition, weather conditions have been changing and it is necessary to continue generating materials that adapt to this scenario (Padmavathi and Virmani, 2013).
Within the safflower crop there are two types: those that produce a high percentage oil of monounsaturated and oleic acid, and those with high concentration of polyunsaturated acids and linoleic acid (Zapata, 2010; SAGARPA, 2017). Historically within the genetic improvement program varieties that contained oil of the linoleic type, because it was what was required by the industry (Montoya et al., 2008; Bourbon et al., 2011); however, in recent years, attending to the needs of the edible oil industry, emphasis has been placed on the generation of safflower materials with a high content of oleic acid (Montoya et al., 2008) due to the benign properties it has on human food (Montes et al., 2016).
But research of linoleic materials is still maintained, with the aim of preventing possible needs of these materials in the near future, by farmers and industry (Montoya et al., 2008). Therefore, the objective of this research was to determine the agronomic behavior of the elite lines of the oleic and linoleic type generated by the genetic improvement program and also to identify possible candidate materials to be released as new varieties. based on its productive potential, quality and tolerance to diseases present in the region.
Materials and methods
This work was carried out within the facilities of the Norman E. Borlaug Experimental Field located in block 910 of the Yaqui Valley, during the autumn-winter 2016-17 and autumn-winter 2017-2018 where cycles where a previous irrigation was applied to be able to sow them on land, with planting dates of: December 20, 2017 and January 24, 2019, respectively. 24 elite lines were established (Table 1), from the safflower improvement programme (23 oleics, 1 linoleic), selected for their good agronomic characteristics, as well as their good production and quality of oil, also for presenting tolerance to false mildew and 3 RC-1002 witnesses (linoleic), Chey ol and Ciano ol (oleic), varieties that are widely planted in the region. All materials were generated by the program using traditional methods of improvement (Pedigree) and selection. Throughout their development, they were subjected to different types of stress and recurrent selections were made in order to obtain these materials.
Table 1 Lines and varieties used for the development of this study.
Material |
Origin |
Type |
Material |
Origin |
Type |
0272-12-3-5-OY |
Elite line |
Oleic |
CC1644-1-2-0Y |
Elite line |
Oleic |
0272-3-2 |
Elite line |
Oleic |
CCC-1561 |
Elite line |
Oleic |
C-27-1Y-2Y(A/N) |
Elite line |
Oleic |
CCC-1564-1-1-1-1-0Y |
Elite line |
Oleic |
C-32-0Y |
Elite line |
Oleic |
CCC-1633-1-1-1-0Y |
Elite line |
Oleic |
C-54-1-OY |
Elite line |
Oleic |
CCC-1651-1-1-1-2-0Y |
Elite line |
Oleic |
C-56-1Y-1Y |
Elite line |
Oleic |
CCC-1651-1-1-1-2Y-1Y |
Elite line |
Oleic |
C-61-1Y-1Y |
Elite line |
Oleic |
CCC-1672-1-1-1-1 |
Elite line |
Oleic |
C-63-0Y |
Elite line |
Oleic |
S-518-SEL-PPR'SS10 (A/N) |
Elite line |
Oleic |
C-65-0Y |
Elite line |
Oleic |
CIANO-OL/ CC1658-1-0Y |
Elite line |
Oleic |
C-72-0Y |
Elite line |
Oleic |
S-518-SEL-PPR'SS10 (A/N) |
Elite line |
Oleic |
CC-14-31-5-1-OY. 1-2-0Y |
Elite line |
Oleic |
CHEY-OL |
Variety |
Oleic |
CC1567-1-1-0Y-1C |
Elite line |
Oleic |
CIANO-OL |
Variety |
Oleic |
CC-15-76-1-1-0Y-1C |
Elite line |
Oleic |
RC-1002 |
Variety |
Linoleic |
CC1631-1-1-1-1 |
Elite line |
Oleic |
|
|
|
CC1635-1-1-1-1Y |
Elite line |
LinOleic |
|
|
|
A completely random experimental design was established with four repetitions, on a plot of four grooves at 80 cm of separation and a length of 6 meters (19.2 m2). These materials were given the agronomic management recommended by INIFAP in the region, which consisted of a fertilization of 150-52-00 (N-P-K), in addition two relief irrigations were carried out during the stage of stem elongation and the formation of flower buttons, insecticides for insect control and no disease control application were carried out.
Weekly sampling was carried out when the plant passed the rosette stage and until the beginning of flowering, in search of the characteristic lesions caused by the false mildew R. carthami. And the rust of the leaf caused by Puccinia carthami. Similarly, climate data were taken from the automated station located within block 910, recording variables of: average, maximum and minimum temperature, relative humidity and precipitation (REMAS, 2019).
Regarding agronomic variables, the variables of plant height, were recorded, where the measurement of three plants per repetition was taken with the help of a measure of length equivalent to four rods and the values were averaged. To determine physiological maturity, the days elapsed from planting until the plant showed symptoms of senescence were counted. The incidence and severity of the false mildew was determined using the scale proposed by Ramírez et al. (2011). Which consisted of visually dividing into lower, middle and upper thirds. To evaluate the severity, an arbitrary and continuous scale from 1 to 100% was used according to the visual estimation of the leaf area affected by the symptoms in each sampled leaf. Data were taken from one leaf per stratum per plant.
For the yield variable, 4 m of the plot were harvested, leaving 1 m headland at the edges, and then being processed with a threshing machine of type ‘Pullman’, weigh the obtained grain and convert it to kg ha-1. The values obtained from this variable were performed with a variance analysis and a mean test with significant minimum difference (DMS) to determine statistical significances. A sample of 100 g of grain was taken from the harvested product and processed with a FOSS oil analyzer to determine the oil content.
Results and discussion
During the two evaluation cycles the climatic conditions were not favorable for the development of the false mildew, however; during the first evaluation cycle 2017-2018 there were mild symptoms of the disease in the lines, C-54-1-OY, C-27-1Y-2Y(A/N), S-518-SEL-PPR’SS10 (A/N) which did not reach 5% of the affected foliar area on the scale proposed by Ramirez et al. (2011) and during the second evaluation cycle there are no symptoms of the disease in any of the lines, nor in regional witnesses
In this regard Ramírez et al. (2011); Singh et al. (2019) mention that R. carthami is a disease that requires very specific conditions of temperature and humidity, in addition to the materials evaluated in the study were selected apart from its agronomic characteristics and oil quality, because it has resistance to that disease. Only one application was carried out for the control of the complex of sucking insects (Lygus lineolaris and Nezara viridula) present during the button formation and flowering period. This application was carried out with the help of an aircraft, due to the impossibility of making it terrestrial due to the height of the crop. Table 2 shows the variability in the agronomic characteristics of the materials evaluated.
Table 2 Agronomic data of elite safflower lines cycles 2017-2018, 2018-2019. City Obregón, Sonora.
Genotype |
Days to maturity |
|
Height (cm) |
||
2017-2018 |
2018-2019 |
|
2017-2018 |
2018-2019 |
|
0272-12-3-5-OY |
133 |
105 |
|
137 |
101 |
0272-3-2 |
135 |
104 |
|
142 |
99 |
C-27-1Y-2Y(A/N) |
137 |
102 |
|
137 |
98 |
C-32-0Y |
138 |
109 |
|
146 |
97 |
C-54-1-OY |
135 |
106 |
|
139 |
96 |
C-56-1Y-1Y |
138 |
96 |
|
138 |
95 |
C-61-1Y-1Y |
138 |
100 |
|
134 |
100 |
C-63-0Y |
138 |
110 |
|
146 |
101 |
C-65-0Y |
138 |
105 |
|
149 |
95 |
C-72-0Y |
138 |
107 |
|
143 |
99 |
CC-14-31-5-1-OY. 1-2-0Y |
135 |
137 |
|
165 |
102 |
CC1567-1-1-0Y-1C |
133 |
105 |
|
142 |
99 |
CC-15-76-1-1-0Y-1C |
133 |
103 |
|
144 |
95 |
CC1631-1-1-1-1 |
138 |
101 |
|
134 |
102 |
CC1635-1-1-1-1Y |
138 |
106 |
|
151 |
93 |
CC1644-1-2-0Y |
137 |
113 |
|
146 |
107 |
CCC-1561 |
137 |
93 |
|
146 |
91 |
CCC-1564-1-1-1-1-0Y |
137 |
112 |
|
141 |
96 |
CCC-1633-1-1-1-0Y |
135 |
111 |
|
146 |
97 |
CCC-1651-1-1-1-2-0Y |
135 |
116 |
|
145 |
110 |
CCC-1651-1-1-1-2Y-1Y |
138 |
113 |
|
153 |
105 |
CCC-1672-1-1-1-1 |
138 |
97 |
|
141 |
92 |
S-518-SEL-PPR'SS10 (A/N) |
137 |
101 |
|
143 |
98 |
CIANO-OL/CC1658-1-0Y |
138 |
103 |
|
165 |
106 |
S-518-SEL-PPR'SS10 (A/N) |
137 |
101 |
|
143 |
98 |
CHEY-OL |
138 |
137 |
|
127 |
94 |
CIANO-OL |
135 |
137 |
|
163 |
102 |
RC-1002 |
135 |
137 |
|
131 |
96 |
The differences between the variables from days to maturity and height, during the two cycles evaluated is due to the different planting date, the first of December 20, 2019 and the other of January 24, 2019. During both planting periods all the materials completed their vegetative cycle before the time period of 140 to 150 days (Navejas et al., 2008; Nikabadi et al., 2008); Padmavathi and Virmani, 2013; Ávila et al., 2014), for the Northwest. Even during the second year of evaluation some lines such as: C-56-1Y-1Y, CCC-1561, CCC-1672-1-1-1-1.
They managed to complete the cycle before 100 days, far exceeding what was previously reported, coinciding with what was reported by Bellé et al. (2012); Navejas et al. (2014); Ramonda (2019) which mention that the planting date is a very important factor for the development of the crop, since plants established at an early date tend to enlarge their cycle and produce lush proportions compared to late and intermediate dated plants that shorten their vegetative cycle and height. According to Montoya (2010); Golkar et al. (2012) materials with characteristics of precocity, of a compact size, oil content above 38% and good production, are favorable to be released as commercial varieties.
Potential oil production in safflower crop is an extremely complex feature and is the result of multiple growth and development functions, which are controlled by genotype and environmental interaction (Kuruvadi et al., 1993; Ashrafi and Razmjoo, 2010). Over time it has always been a primary objective of safflower plant breeders to introduce this characteristic to all the materials that are generated since, although different uses can be given to the crop, its natural vocation is the production of oil for human consumption and, as a result of the search for new energy sources, its potential to produce biofuel has been investigated (Ullah and Bano, 2011; Vosoughkia et al., 2012; Eryilmaz and Yesilyurt, 2016).
Over time, the genetic improvement program had been dedicated to generating linoleic materials, which have been grown in different middle eastern countries such as Iran and India (Pourad, 2008; Mahboobeh et al., 2011), in recent years research has decreased in this section. Among the materials evaluated of this type is the line: CC1635-1-1-1-1Y which has presented production values and percentage of oil higher than the witness of the type Linoleic RC-1002 (Table 3), Montoya (2008). And to other commercial varieties of the same type such as the variety ‘Promesa and Guayalejo’ of recent release (Valadez and Cervantes, 2013; Valadez and Gutiérrez, 2017).
Table 3 Production and quality of elite lines of safflower cycles 2017-2018, 2018-2019. Obregón, City Sonora.
Genotype |
Oil (%) |
|
Yield (kg ha-1) |
||||
2017-2018 |
2018-2019 |
|
2017-2018 |
2018-2019 |
|||
0272-12-3-5-OY |
34.82 |
36.43 |
|
1 575 |
abcde |
1764 |
abc |
0272-3-2 |
38.01 |
37.66 |
|
1 968 |
ab |
1216 |
c |
C-27-1Y-2Y(A/N) |
37.71 |
37.44 |
|
1 548 |
abcde |
1849 |
ab |
C-32-0Y |
37.44 |
37.1 |
|
1 473 |
bcde |
1329 |
bc |
C-54-1-OY |
37.28 |
37.62 |
|
1 697 |
abcde |
1367 |
bc |
C-56-1Y-1Y |
37.8 |
37.65 |
|
1 629 |
abcde |
1271 |
bc |
C-61-1Y-1Y |
37.21 |
38.72 |
|
1 314 |
de |
1193 |
c |
C-63-0Y |
39.44 |
38.1 |
|
1 665 |
abcde |
1994 |
a |
C-65-0Y |
38.97 |
38.27 |
|
1 670 |
abcde |
1292 |
abc |
C-72-0Y |
36.49 |
36.13 |
|
2 028 |
a |
1277 |
bc |
CC-14-31-5-1-OY…. 1-2-0Y |
39.76 |
43.32 |
|
1 717 |
abcde |
1703 |
abc |
CC1567-1-1-0Y-1C |
38.22 |
37.85 |
|
1 479 |
abcde |
1398 |
abc |
CC-15-76-1-1-0Y-1C |
36.77 |
37.66 |
|
1 200 |
de |
1174 |
c |
CC1631-1-1-1-1 |
38.42 |
36.78 |
|
1 214 |
de |
1246 |
bc |
CC1635-1-1-1-1Y |
40.45 |
39.17 |
|
1 436 |
bcde |
1215 |
c |
CC1644-1-2-0Y |
36.76 |
36.68 |
|
1 362 |
cde |
1213 |
c |
CCC-1561 |
38.16 |
36.93 |
|
1 704 |
abcd |
1432 |
abc |
CCC-1564-1-1-1-1-0Y |
37.13 |
37.68 |
|
1 139 |
e |
1554 |
abc |
CCC-1633-1-1-1-0Y |
37.25 |
37.69 |
|
1 488 |
abcde |
1328 |
bc |
CCC-1651-1-1-1-2-0Y |
37.96 |
37.95 |
|
1 234 |
de |
1323 |
bc |
CCC-1651-1-1-1-2Y-1Y |
37.95 |
36.65 |
|
1 647 |
abcde |
1471 |
abc |
CCC-1672-1-1-1-1 |
42.16 |
37.95 |
|
1 672 |
abcde |
1217 |
c |
S-518-SEL-PPR'SS10 (A/N) |
38.22 |
36.43 |
|
1 634 |
abcde |
1183 |
c |
CIANO-OL/CC1658-1-0Y |
37.02 |
36.88 |
|
1 276 |
ded |
1288 |
bc |
S-518-SEL-PPR'SS10 (A/N) |
38.22 |
36.43 |
|
1 634 |
abcde |
1183 |
c |
CHEY-OL |
36.4 |
36.24 |
|
1 614 |
abcde |
1193 |
c |
CIANO-OL |
37.76 |
37.24 |
|
1 676 |
abcde |
1500 |
abc |
RC-1002 |
40.77 |
37.37 |
|
1 892 |
abc |
1319 |
bc |
α = 95% DMS 2017-2018= 571.244 DMS 2018-2019= 624.522.
In recent years, research has focused on generating materials with a high oleic acid content. Within the evaluated lines it can find some that have higher production values and oil content than witnesses Ciano Ol and Chey Ol. among these it can be found: CC-14-31-5-1-OY 1-2-0Y, and CCC-1672-1-1-1-1 with an oil percentage of 43% and 42% respectively. Widely exceeding the aforementioned witnesses which present only 37 and 36% oil (Montoya et al., 2008; Ávila et al., 2017).
Conclusions
Within the materials evaluated there are lines of the oleic type such as: CC-14-31-5-1-OY. 1-2-0Y and CCC-1672-1-1-1-1. that have agronomic characteristics that make them possible candidates to be released as varieties; however, it is necessary to make assessments in the different producing regions of northwestern Mexico to know their behavior under the different climatic characteristics present in each area.
Although research on linoleic materials has decreased, materials are still being generated in order to satisfy possible needs of the producer and industry. As is the case with line CC1635-1-1-1-1Y which has managed to surpass the linoleic witness RC-1002. And which places it as a candidate to be released as a variety in case linoleic type materials are required.
The results of this work show that the genetic improvement programme for safflower crop has performed good results and although, the generation of materials that have resistance to disease and high productivity and oil content is an incentive for producers to decide to grow safflower, the truth is that the determining factor for the area of safflower to increase is the price.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT) for the support in the development of this work and the Genetic Improvement Program for the safflower crop of the Institute of Agricultural and Livestock Forestry Research (INIFAP) for the facilities granted in the preparation of this study.
REFERENCES
Asgarpanah, J. and Kasemivash, N. 2013. Phytochemistry, pharmacology and medicinal properties of Carthamus tinctorius L. Chinese J. Integrative Medicine. 19(2):153-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-013-1354-5. [ Links ]
Ashrafi, E. and Razmjoo, K. 2010. Effect of irrigation regimes on oil content and composition of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars. J. American Oil Chemists Society. 87(5):499-506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-009-1527-8. [ Links ]
Ávila, C. E. J. I.; Alvarado, P. M.; Camarillo, P. X. M.; Ochoa, E. y Montoya, L. C. 2014. Descripción de variedades de cártamo para el Valle de Mexicali. B. C. INIFAP-CIRNO-CEMEXI. Mexicali, Baja California. Folleto para productores núm. 62. 12 p. [ Links ]
Ávila, C. E. X. M.; Ochoa, E. L.; Montoya, C. N. A.; Aguilera, M. A.; Borbón, G. y Alvarado, J. I. P. 2017. Chey-ol: nueva variedad de cártamo oleica para el noroeste de México. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 8(5):1209-1212. [ Links ]
Bellé, A. R. E.; Kersting-Da, R. F. A. A.; Londero, B. M.; Neuhaus, M. and Teixeira, N. S. 2012. Safflower grown in diferents sowing dates and plant densities. Ciencia Rural. 42(12):2145-2152. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782012005000106. [ Links ]
Borbón, G. A. L.; Montoya, C. X. M.; Ochoa, E. N. A.; Aguilera, M. E.; Ávila, C. y Cota, C. I. B. 2019. SEMAY OL, Nueva variedad de cártamo oleica. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 42(1):83-85. [ Links ]
Borbón, G. A. X. M.; Ochoa, E. L.; Montoya, C. J.; Pérez, M. y García, M. G. C. 2011. CIANO-LIN: nueva variedad de cártamo linoleica. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 2(5):791-794. [ Links ]
Cerutti, M. 2019. Trigo y revolución verde en el noroeste de México mundo agrario. 20(43):1930-1970. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24215/15155994e103. [ Links ]
Chanda, M. G. S.; Muñoz, V. R. D. y García, P. 1990. San José 89: nueva variedad de cártamo. INIFAP-CIFAES-CEVY. Cd. Obregón Sonora. Folleto para técnico núm. 16. 16 p. [ Links ]
Eryilmaz, T. and Yesilyurt, M. K. 2016. Influence of blending ratio on the physicochemical properties of safflower oil methyl ester-safflower oil, safflower oil methyl ester-diesel and safflower oil-diesel. Renewable Energy. 95:233-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.009. [ Links ]
FAOSTAT. 2019. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Crops. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize. [ Links ]
Golkar, P. A.; Arzani. and Rezael, A. 2012. Genetic analysis of agronomic traits in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 40(1):276-281. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha4017209. [ Links ]
Hostert, N. D. C. L.; Blomquist, S. L.; Thomas, D. G.; Fogle, D. G. and Davis, R. M. 2006. First report of Ramularia carthami, causal agent of Ramularia leaf spot of safflower, in California. Plant Disease. 90(9):1260-1261. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-90-1260C. [ Links ]
JLSVVY. 2019. Junta Local de Sanidad Vegetal del Valle del Yaqui. Falsa cenicilla del cártamo. http://jlsvyaqui.org.mx/?page_id=122. [ Links ]
Khalili, M. A.; Pour-Aboughadareh, M. R.; Naghavi, M. R. and Mohammad-amini, E. 2014. Evaluation of drought tolerance in safflower genotypes based on drought tolerance indices. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 42(1):214-218. Doi: 10.15835/nbha4219331. [ Links ]
Kuruvadi, S. R. Aguilera, R. y López, A. B. 1993. Coeficiente de sendero para aceite y sus componentes asociados en cártamo bajo ambientes de riego y temporal. Agraria, Revista Científica UAAAN. 9(2):116-125. [ Links ]
Landau, S. S.; Friedman, S.; Brenner, I.; Bruckental, Z. G.; Weinberg, G.; Ashbell, Y.; Hen, L.; Dvash, Y. and Leshem, Y. 2004. The value of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) hay and silage grown under Mediterranean conditions as forage for dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science. 88(3):263-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2003.11.011. [ Links ]
Machewad, G. M. P.; Ghatge, V.; Chappalwar, B.; Jadhav, B. and Chappalwar, A. 2012. Studies on extraction of safflower pigments and its utilization in ice cream. J. Food Proc. Technol. 3(6):3-8. Doi: 10.4172/2157-7110.1000172. [ Links ]
Mahboobeh, V. M.; Ghavamib, M.; Gharachorloo, M.; Sharrifmoghaddasi, M. and Omidi A. A. 2011. Lipid composition and oxidative stability of oils in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) seed varieties grow in Iran. Adv. Envirom. Biol. 5(5):897-902. [ Links ]
Martínez, C. D. A. J.; Chávez, M. A.; Bustamante, G. O. L.; Palacios, V. M. L.; De-Isla, B. y Tijerina, L. C. 2016. Variación espacial de la calidad del agua para uso agrícola del acuífero costero del Valle del Mayo, Sonora, México. Hidrobiológica. 26(1):109-119. [ Links ]
Minjarez, L. J. L. B.; Valdés, J. R. F.; Salmon, C. and Oroz, L. A R. 2010. Sustainable planning, management, and evaluation of water resources in irrigation District No. 041, Río Yaqui, Mexico. Water technology and sciences, formerly hydraulic engineering in Mexico. 1(1):137-151. [ Links ]
Montes, O. N. I.; Millar, M. R.; Provoste, L. N.; Martínez, M. D.; Fernández, Z. G.; Morales, I. y Valenzuela, R. B. 2016. Absorción de aceite en alimentos fritos. Revista Chilena de Nutrición. 43(1):87-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75182016000100013. [ Links ]
Montoya, C. L. C. M.; Armenta, C. J. A.; Ramírez, A. R.; Valenzuela, B. I.; Armenta, C. F.; Cabrera, C. M J.; Beltrán, F. R. A.; Lagarda, G. A.; Borbón, G. y Ochoa, X. M. E. 2008. Guía para producir cártamo INIFAP-CIRNO-CEVY-SEMAY en Sonora. Ciudad Obregón, Sonora. Folleto para productores núm. 38. 27 p. [ Links ]
Montoya, C. L. F.; Ochoa, B. J.; Wong, P. M.; Camarillo, P. y Macias, J. C. 2008. CIANO-OL, CIANO-LIN, RC-1002-L, RC-1005-L y RC-1033-L variedades de cártamo altamente tolerantes a falsa cenicilla (Ramularia carthami). INIFAP-CIRNO-CEVY. Cd. Obregón Sonora. Folleto técnico núm. 60. 27 p. [ Links ]
Montoya, C. L. y Ochoa, F. B. 2006. Guía para producir cártamo en el sur de Sonora. INIFAP-CIRNO-CESS, Cd. Obregón Sonora. Folleto para productores núm. 37. 24 p. [ Links ]
Montoya, C. L. 2010. El cultivo de cártamo (Carthamus tinctorius L.) en México. INIFAP-CIRNO-CENEB. Cd. Obregón Sonora. Libro técnico núm. 5. 96 p. [ Links ]
Navejas, J. J. L.; Montoya, C. y Gutierres, E. P. 2008. Guía para producir cártamo en el Valle de Santo Domingo. BCS. INIFAP-CIRNO-SESD. Santo Domingo, Baja California Sur. Folleto para productores núm. 17. 17 p. [ Links ]
Navejas, J. J. J. A. C.; Navarro A. y Gutierres, E. P. 2014. Paquete tecnológico para la producción de cártamo. INIFAP-CIRNO-CETODS. La Paz, Baja California Sur. Folleto para productores núm. 19. 17 p. [ Links ]
Nikabadi, S. A.; Soleimani, S. M.; Dehdashti, S. M. and Yazdanibakhsh, M. 2008. Effect of sowing dates on yield and yield components of spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in Isfahan Region. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 11(5):1953-1956. Doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2008.1953.1956. [ Links ]
Padmavathi, P. and Virmani, S. M. 2013. Impact of climate change on safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L) in India and México. J. Agrometeorology. 15(1):58-61. [ Links ]
Paquini, R. S. L. I.; Benítez, R. H. E.; Villaseñor, M. A.; Muñoz, O. y Vaquera, H. H. 2016. Incremento en el rendimiento y sus componentes bajo riego normal y restringido de variedades mexicanas de trigo. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 39(4):367-378. [ Links ]
Pourad, S. 2008. Study on drought resistance indices in spring safflower. Acta Agronómica Hungarica. 56(2):203-212. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAgr.56.2008.2.9. [ Links ]
Quilantán, V. L. 1978. Cártamo. In: Cervantes, S. T. (Ed.). Recursos genéticos disponibles a México. Sociedad Mexicana de Citogenética, AC. 209-213 pp. [ Links ]
Ramírez, A. J. A. C. M.; Armenta, C. L.; Montoya, C. F.; Cabrera, C. y Valenzuela, J. R. B 2011. Epidemiologia de la falsa cenicilla del cártamo (Ramularia carthami) en el sur de Sonora. INIFAP-CIRNO-CENEB. Cd. Obregón Sonora. Folleto técnico núm. 82. 24 p. [ Links ]
Ramírez, A. J. A. F.; Cabrera, C. L.; Montoya, C. X. M.; Ochoa E. y Borbón, A. G. 2017. Efecto del riego en el desarrollo y control de la falsa cenicilla del cártamo en el sur de Sonora. INIFAP-CIRNO-CENEB. Cd. Obregón Sonora. Folleto técnico núm. 101. 28 p. [ Links ]
Ramonda, F. C. J.; Ferrero, Fritz, F. y Baudino, E. M. 2019. Influencia de la fecha de siembra sobre los determinantes fisiológicos y numéricos del rendimiento en el cultivo de cártamo (Carthamus tinctorius L.) en la pampa. SEMIARIDA. 29(1):63-69. https://doi.org/10.19137/semiarida. [ Links ]
Ramos, A. M. J. G.; Barrios, P. Z.; Hernández, A. J. y Hernández, O. 2019. Impacto de una posible depreciación del peso mexicano en las importaciones mexicanas de oleaginosas. Rev. Mex. Agronegocios. 44:208-220. Doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.292261. [ Links ]
REMAS. 2019. Red de Estaciones Meteorológicas Automatizadas del estado de Sonora. Reporte de estación. http://www.siafeson.com/remas/index.php/estacionglobal?rid=85. [ Links ]
Reta, S. D. G. J. S.; Serrato, C. H. M.; Quiroga, G. A.; Gaytán, M. y Figueroa, U. M. 2017. Secuencias de cultivo alternativas para incrementar el potencial forrajero y productividad del agua. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Pec. 8(4):397-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v8i4.4645. [ Links ]
SAGARPA. 2017. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación. Oleaginosas mexicanas: canola, cártamo, girasol y soya. Planeación Agrícola Nacional 2017-2030. 26 p. [ Links ]
SIAP. 2021. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. Anuario estadístico de la producción agrícola. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera-Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. Ciudad de México. https://nube.siap.gob.mx/cierreagricola/. [ Links ]
Silveira, G. M. I. M. L.; Aldana, M. L. A.; Medina, J. y Serrano, A. E. 2009. Situación de la producción de cártamo (Carthamus tinctorius L.) en Sonora, México y factores asociados. Biotecnia. 11(3):44-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.18633/bt.v11i3.73. [ Links ]
Singh, N. A.; Garima, A. and Kapoor, R. 2019. Incidence and severity of fungal diseases of safflower in India. Crop Protection. 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.104905. [ Links ]
Singh, S. S. V.; Angadi, K.; Grover, S.; Begna, S. and Auld, D. 2016. Drough response and yield formation of spring safflower under different water regimes in the semiarid Southern high Plains. Agricultural Water Management. 163:354-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.10.010. [ Links ]
Ullah, F. and Bano, A. 2011. Effect of plant growth regulators on yield and biodiesel production of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Brazilian J. Plant Physiol. 23(1):27-31. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202011000100005. [ Links ]
Valadez, G. J. y Cervantes, J. E. M. 2013. Guayalejo, variedad de cártamo para la región sur de Tamaulipas. INIFAP- CIRNE-CEHUAS. Villa Cuauhtémoc, Tamaulipas. Folleto técnico núm. MX-0-310302-52-03-14-09-29. 15 p. [ Links ]
Valadez, G. J. y Cervantes, J. E. M. 2017. Promesa, variedad de polinización libre de cártamo para la región de las huastecas. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 40(1):103-105. [ Links ]
Vosoughkia, M.; Hossainchi, G. L.; Ghavami, M. M.; Gharachorloo, M. and Delkhosh, B. 2012. Evaluation of oil content and fatty acid composition in seeds of different genotypes of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Inter. J. Agric. Sci. Res. 2(1):59-66. [ Links ]
Zapata, M. L. E. 2010. Situación y perspectivas del aceite de palma alto oleico O x G en Colombia. Palmas. 31(2):349-353. [ Links ]
Received: January 01, 2021; Accepted: March 01, 2021