SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.82 número4Estado actual de la formación urológica en IberoaméricaComplicaciones posquirúrgicas en cistectomías radicales a 30 días: factores relacionados y uso de la escala de APGAR quirúrgico para su predicción índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de urología

versión On-line ISSN 2007-4085versión impresa ISSN 0185-4542

Resumen

GARCIA-ESCOBAR, Jean Carlos et al. Lich-Gregoir laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in a third-level hospital. Rev. mex. urol. [online]. 2022, vol.82, n.4, e02.  Epub 13-Mar-2023. ISSN 2007-4085.  https://doi.org/10.48193/revistamexicanadeurologa.v82i4.765.

Objective:

To present the results of our series of patients with lower third ureteral pathology, who underwent laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in a tertiary care hospital.

Material and methods:

A retrospective study that included 18 patients with lower third ureteral pathology, treated with laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation, between July 2014 and December 2020. Demographic and clinical data, intraoperative results, complications, and days of hospital stay were collected, as well as postoperative control.

Results:

Transperitoneal Lich-Gregoir laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation was performed in 18 patients with lower third ureteral pathology (6 men and 12 women, 8 cases with right laterality and 10 left). Etiology: (11) 61% postsurgical stenosis, (2) 11% ureterovaginal fistula; (3) 17% vesicoureteral reflux, and (2) 11% congenital stricture. All cases had preoperative imaging studies. The mean age was 38.7 years; transoperative time 152 minutes; intraoperative bleeding of 65 ml. There were no intraoperative complications; The average hospital stay was 2.5 days. In all cases, a double J ureteral catheter was placed, which was removed 4 to 6 weeks after surgery.

Conclusions:

The laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation is a safe procedure for the treatment of lower third ureteral pathology. This modality seems to improve the profile of perioperative complications compared to the open approach, maintaining long-term results.

The laparoscopic approach shows a decrease in surgical time, less bleeding, and a lower rate of complications and hospital stay, however, laparoscopic skills and experience must be available to perform it.

Palabras llave : laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation; lower third ureteral pathology; vesicoureteral reflux; double J catheter.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )