SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29 número1El manejo forestal acelera la acumulación de biomasa aérea en un bosque templado del centro de México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista Chapingo serie ciencias forestales y del ambiente

versión On-line ISSN 2007-4018versión impresa ISSN 2007-3828

Rev. Chapingo ser. cienc. for. ambient vol.29 no.1 Chapingo ene./abr. 2023  Epub 23-Jun-2024

https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2022.03.019 

Scientific articles

Influence of fertilization on survival and growth of Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham. under nursery and field conditions

Mitsuo Heras-Marcial1 

Arnulfo Aldrete1  * 

Armando Gómez-Guerrero1 

Dante A. Rodríguez-Trejo2 

1Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, Postgrado en Ciencias Forestales. Carretera México-Texcoco km 36.5. C. P. 56230. Texcoco, Estado de México, México.

2Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, División de Ciencias Forestales. Carretera México-Texcoco km 38.5. C.P. 56230. Texcoco, Estado de México, México.


Abstract

Introduction:

The use of fertilizers for forest plant production in nursery improves quality and favors field performance.

Objective:

To identify the effects of fertilizer doses on the growth of Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham. under nursery conditions, and survival and growth under field conditions.

Materials and methods:

A total of eight fertilization treatments with eight (Multicote Agri®) and 12 months (Multicote®) nutrient release times were evaluated at the GUMAIR nursery in Acaxochitlán, Hidalgo. Plants were established in the field and fertilization treatments were incorporated to evaluate survival and growth (height and diameter) after a year.

Results and discussion:

Under nursery conditions, plants with 8 g∙L-1 of eight-month fertilizer in combination with 4 and 6 g∙L-1 of 12-month fertilizer release had the highest values (P ≤ 0.0001) in all variables. The combination of 4 g∙L-1 of eight-month fertilizer and 4 g∙L-1 of 12-month fertilizer release had the same effect as these treatments in diameter, root and shoot dry weight and Dickson's quality index under nursery conditions, while under field conditions it caused higher survival (95 %) after a year of planting. The effect of these three treatments in the nursery agreed with the higher growth and N concentration in foliage under field conditions.

Conclusion:

Plants with desired morphological characteristics and better field performance were obtained with 4 g∙L-1 of eight-month fertilizer and 4 g∙L-1 of 12-month release.

Keywords: seedling quality; plant production; morphological evaluation; controlled release fertilizer

Resumen

Introducción:

El uso de fertilizantes para la producción de planta forestal en vivero mejora la calidad y favorece el desempeño en campo.

Objetivo:

Identificar los efectos de dosis de fertilización sobre el crecimiento de Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham. en condiciones de vivero, y la supervivencia y crecimiento en campo.

Materiales y métodos:

En el vivero GUMAIR en Acaxochitlán, Hidalgo, se evaluaron ocho tratamientos de fertilización con tiempos de ocho (Multicote Agri®) y 12 meses (Multicote®) de liberación de nutrientes. Las plantas se establecieron en campo y se incorporaron tratamientos de fertilización para evaluar supervivencia y crecimiento (altura y diámetro) después de un año.

Resultados y discusión:

En vivero, las plantas con 8 g∙L-1 de fertilizante de ocho meses en combinación con 4 y 6 g∙L-1 de fertilizante de 12 meses de liberación mostraron los valores más altos (P ≤ 0.0001) en todas las variables. La combinación de 4 g∙L-1 de fertilizante de ocho meses y 4 g∙L-1 de fertilizante de 12 meses de liberación tuvo el mismo efecto que dichos tratamientos en diámetro, peso seco radical y aéreo e índice de calidad de Dickson en vivero; mientras que en campo causó mayor supervivencia (95 %) después de un año de la plantación. El efecto de estos tres tratamientos en vivero coincidió en el mayor crecimiento y concentración de N en el follaje en campo.

Conclusión:

Las plantas con características morfológicas deseadas y mejor desempeño en campo se obtuvieron con 4 g∙L-1 de fertilizante de ocho meses y 4 g∙L-1 de 12 meses de liberación.

Palabras clave: calidad de planta; producción de planta; evaluación morfológica; fertilizante de liberación controlada

Highlights:

  • Fertilizers of eight and 12 months of nutrient release were evaluated on Pinus patula.

  • The effect of fertilizer doses was significant on growth variables.

  • Survival ranged from 75 to 95 % one year after field planting.

  • The recommended nursery dose is 4 g∙L-1 of eight-month fertilizer and 4 g∙L-1 of 12-month release fertilizer.

Introduction

Reforestations promoted by the Comisión Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR), through the subsidies it offers, had 63.77 % average survival in the field in 2018. However, the percentages were variable due to the presence of drought, frost, grazing and environmental factors, including precipitation and temperature; another decisive aspect was the quality of the plant, especially regarding nutrient content during nursery production (CONAFOR, 2018). Moderate nutrient deficiency can cause physiological stress, while seedlings with adequate nutrition reach better sizes. The effect of fertilization on seedlings depends on the type, dose, form and time of application (Fu, Oliet, Li, & Wang, 2017). Rodríguez (2008) mentions that the importance of seedling quality control lies in obtaining morphological and physiological standards and in the specification of these standards in the field evaluation, which have been scarcely analyzed and studied in Mexico.

Fertilizer use in nursery-based forest plant production systems is important because an appropriate nutrition regime improves quality and enhances field performance of seedlings (Landis & Dumroese, 2009; Grossnickle & MacDonald, 2018). Despite this, fertilization procedures and routines, specific to each species, are unknown, as well as the effect of the nutrient content of the seedlings on their field performance (Jackson, Dumroese, & Barnett, 2012; Oliet, Puértolas, Planelles, & Jacobs, 2013).

Controlled-release fertilizers supply the nutrients required by plants during growing and in the nursery can be managed in a single application. This simplifies the production process, reduces labor costs, and minimizes leaching losses in irrigation water (Haase, Rose, & Trobaugh, 2006; Landis & Dumroese, 2009). Controlled-release fertilizers have the potential to increase the competitiveness of forest plants in a variety of reforestation sites; however, there is little knowledge regarding release patterns and their mechanisms of interaction with growth media (Rose, Haase, & Arellano, 2004), seedling quality and field survival.

This study aims to identify the direct effects of different doses of fertilization on the morphological characteristics of Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham. under nursery conditions, and the survival and growth in the field.

Materials and Methods

Nursery stage

Study area

This research was carried out from January 30 to September 18, 2020 in the GUMAIR forest nursery, municipality of Acaxochitlán, Hidalgo, at 2 400 m elevation and geographical coordinates 20° 09' 08'' N and 98° 13' 11'' W. The municipality of Acaxochitlán has mean temperature of 15.1 °C and mean annual precipitation of 915.5 mm (Comisión Nacional del Agua [CONAGUA], 2019).

Plant production

We used expanded polystyrene trays of 77 cavities of 160 cm3 capacity. The substrate consisted of a mixture of 70 % fresh pine sawdust (non-composted), 20 % composted pine bark, 5 % vermiculite and 5 % perlite; the fertilizer doses corresponding to each treatment were added to this mixture. The controlled release fertilizers used were Multicote Agri® (8) 18-6-12 + 2CaO + 3.5MgO + 2.1Si + ME (eight months release at average substrate temperature of 21 °C) and Multicote® (12) 19-10-13 + 2MgO + ME (12 months release at average substrate temperature of 21 °C). Seeds were purchased from the ejido Llano Grande, Chignahuapan, Puebla.

Treatments studied

The combination of fertilizer doses both in the nursery and in the field generated eight treatments, which are detailed in Table 1. All treatments were evaluated both in nursery and, subsequently, in the field, an extra dose was added to treatments T5, T6 and T7 to compare the fertilization applied only in the nursery with the option of fertilizing again in the field. Each treatment included four replicates or trays.

Table 1. Controlled release fertilizer doses per treatment for Pinus patula production in nursery and field development. 

Treatment Nursery (g∙L-1) Field (g∙tree-1)
TL 8 TL 12 TL 12
T1 (control) 8 0 0
T2 8 2 0
T3 8 4 0
T4 8 6 0
T5 8 0 6
T6 8 0 12
T7 8 0 18
T8 4 4 0

TL = nutrient release time (months). TL8: Multicote Agri® 18-6-12 + 2CaO + 3.5MgO + 2.1Si + ME; TL12: Multicote® 19-10-13 + 2MgO + ME.

Materials management and production conditions

The internal walls of the tray cavities were immersed in a 7 % cupric hydroxide solution to promote chemical pruning of the lateral roots of the plants. The substrate materials were passed through a sifter with a 10 mm mesh to obtain a homogeneous mixture without coarse particles. The seeds were soaked in water for 8 h and subsequently disinfected with 5 % hydrogen peroxide for 20 min; they were also treated with Bactiva® (Bacillus spp. and Trichoderma spp.) at a dose of 0.15 g∙L-1.

The production area of the nursery had a shade house type structure with black mesh of 50 % coverage, with a metallic structure support, metallic tables for holding trays of 1.5 m wide by 80 cm high and a micro-sprinkler irrigation system. The shade net was kept in the production area from sowing (January) to April. Plant development in the nursery was not affected by pests, diseases or meteorological conditions.

Variables evaluated

After 7.5 months after sowing, 12 plants were randomly extracted per tray, resulting in a total of 48 individuals per treatment. Height was measured with a metal ruler from the base to the apical bud, and the diameter at the base of the stem was measured with a digital vernier (Truper®, model IP54). The plants were then cut to separate shoots and roots, placed separately in paper bags and dried in an oven for 72 h at 70 °C. The dry weight of the root and shoots was determined with a digital scale (OHAUS, model Navigator).

The data were used to establish the seedling quality indicators proposed by Duryea (1985) and Landis, Dumroese, and Haase (2010): Shoot dry weight and root dry weight ratio (SDW/RDW), sturdiness quotient (SQ), and Dickson's quality index (DQI).

Field period

Study area

This plantation was established on September 4, 2020 in a private property (2 262 m, 20° 10´ 52´´ N and 98° 13´ 30´´ W) in the municipality of Cuaunepantla, Hidalgo. The municipality has an average temperature of 15 °C and average annual precipitation of 915.5 mm (CONAGUA, 2019). The plantation site is for forest use, slightly undulating with a mild slope; surrounding the site there is a forest area and a zone under forest exploitation, where P. patula and Quercus sp. predominate.

A composite mixture extracted from five areas of the site was analyzed at the Laboratorio Nacional de Investigación y Servicio Agroalimentario y Forestal of the Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. According to the NOM-021-RECNAT-2000 (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales [SEMARNAT], 2002), the soil had bulk density of 0.89 g∙cm-3 with pH 5.02 (strongly acid), loamy texture, low cation exchange capacity (11.42 cmol∙kg-1), high contents of organic matter (14.33 %) and inorganic nitrogen (54.59 mg∙kg-1), and low content of phosphorus P and K (3.74 and 186 mg∙kg-1, respectively).

Plantation management

A total of 10 plants per treatment and replication (tray) were randomly selected from the plants produced in the nursery, with 40 plants per treatment and 320 plants evaluated in the field.

The planting had a square design with a spacing of 2.5 m between plants; the planting method was traditional (common hole), using a straight spade to open holes of approximately 30 cm x 30 cm.

For the plants of treatments T5, T6 and T7, a dose of controlled release fertilizer (Multicote® 12) was added at the time of planting (Table 1). The fertilizer was applied around the tree in a radius of 10 cm at a depth of 1 cm and covered with soil using a shovel.

Variables analyzed

After the plantation was established, height and diameter at the base of the stem of each plant were measured as a reference point to estimate growth after one year.

To determine survival, a census of the trees was made at three stages of plantation. The first census was taken after four months, time in which plants had experienced the stress of planting and the cold of part of the winter; the second census was taken after nine months, after the winter and the hot season were completed before the rainy season began; and the last census was taken after 12 months, following most of the rainy season and the stage of greatest growth in the field.

Nine months after planting, the nutrient concentration (N, P and K) of the plants was evaluated. For this purpose, a sample of needles was collected from the middle part of the stems of all the trees of each treatment, according to Wells and Allen (1985), and a composite sample was formed from each treatment of the four blocks of the experimental design in the field, which was placed in properly labeled brown paper bags. Subsequently, the needles were dried in an oven at 70 °C for 72 h. Then, 100 representative needles were selected from each sample and sent to the Nutrition Laboratory of the Colegio de Postgraduados to determine N content by the micro-Kjeldahl method, and P and K by coupled plasma induction optical emission spectrometry (Varian Agilent 725-ES ICP-OES; Mulgrave, Australia), using digestions with a mixture of H2SO4:HClO4 (2:1, v:v) according to Alcántar and Sandoval (1999).

Plant growth (height and diameter at the base of the stem) was evaluated 12 months after planting, when the nutrients contained in the fertilizer granules are released.

Experimental design and statistical analysis

The experimental design in nursery was completely randomized, represented by the model Y 𝑖𝑗 =𝜇+ 𝜏 𝑖 + 𝜀 𝑖𝑗 ; where µ is the overall mean, τ i is the effect of the i-th treatment and ε ij is the experimental error in unit j of treatment i. The field experimental design was a randomized block design, represented by the model 𝑌 𝑖𝑗 =𝜇+ 𝜏 𝑖 + 𝛽 𝑗 + 𝜀 𝑖𝑗 ; where µ is the overall mean, τ i is the effect of the i-th treatment, β j is the effect of the j-th block and ε ij is the experimental error in unit j of treatment i.

Response variables were analyzed in the InfoStat program version 2019e, using ANOVA and Tukey's comparison of means (P ≤ 0.05) between treatments to determine the effects of fertilization doses.

Results and Discussion

Nursery plant evaluation

Morphological characteristics of Pinus patula

The effect of fertilizer doses on P. patula plants was significant for all variables (P ≤ 0.0001). Plants for treatments T3 (8 g∙L-1 of eight-month release fertilizer in combination with 4 g∙L-1 of 12-month release fertilizer) and T4 (8 g∙L-1 of eight-month release fertilizer in combination with 6 g∙L-1 of 12-month release fertilizer) showed the highest values in all variables. Plants in treatment T8 (4 g∙L-1 of eight-month fertilizer and 4 g∙L-1 of 12-month release fertilizer) had similar values to those in T3 and T4 except for height, SDW/RDW ratio and sturdiness quotient, but showed the highest average DQI value (Table 2).

The Mexican Standard NMX-AA-170-SCFI-2016 (Secretaría de Economía, 2016), in its regulatory appendix C, establishes the morphological quality standards for species used for conservation and restoration purposes. In the case of P. patula, it establishes that, by the age of six to seven months, plants must be 25 to 30 cm in height and should be greater than 3.5 mm in diameter. Following these standards, treatments T3, T4 and T8 produced values higher than those indicated in the standard for height while for diameter only the plants of treatments T1 (control), T5 and T7 were below the standard; the last two treatments contained 8 g∙L-1 of eight-month release fertilizer in nursery and different doses of 12-month release fertilizer applied in the field.

Prieto, García, Mejía, Huchin, and Aguilar (2009) indicate that the value of the height/diameter ratio, known as sturdiness quotient, should be less than six, and that it is an indicator of survival and growth in dry sites and of plant resistance to desiccation by wind; therefore, values greater than six indicate that the plant has a thin stem compared to its height. According to this description, the plants of treatments T1, T5, T6 and T7 met this criterion.

Table 2 Morphological variables of Pinus patula plants after 7.5 months of nursery planting. 

Treatment Diameter (mm) Height (cm) SDW (g) RDW (g) TDW (g) SDW/RDW SQ DQI
T1 (control 3.08 d 17.61 d 1.75 c 0.56 c 2.31 c 3.34 c 5.84 c 0.26 c
T2 3.94 b 26.50 c 3.06 b 0.83 a 3.89 b 4.01 bc 6.95 b 0.38 ab
T3 4.53 a 34.90 a 3.91 a 0.76 a 4.66 a 5.45 a 7.79 ab 0.36 ab
T4 4.63 a 36.61 a 4.20 a 0.74 ab 4.94 a 5.80 a 8.03 a 0.36 ab
T5 3.36 cd 15.23 e 1.88 c 0.57 c 2.44 c 3.52 c 4.63 d 0.31 bc
T6 3.68 bc 18.86 d 2.15 c 0.56 c 2.71 c 3.81 bc 5.24 cd 0.30 bc
T7 3.36 cd 17.14 de 2.21 c 0.60 bc 2.81 c 3.70 bc 5.55 c 0.32 bc
T8 4.46 a 31.32 b 3.75 a 0.89 a 4.65 a 4.47 b 7.17 b 0.42 a

SDW = Shoot dry weight, RDW = root dry weight, TDW = total dry weight, SDW/RDW = Shoot dry weight over root dry weight ratio, SQ = sturdiness quotient, DQI = Dickson quality index. The formula of the treatments can be found in Table 1. Mean values (n = 48) with different letters in each morphological variable indicate significant differences between treatments according to Tukey's test (P ≤ 0.05).

Regarding the SDW/RDW ratio, la NMX-AA-170-SCFI-2016 (Secretaría de Economía, 2016) indicates that the value should range between 1.5 and 2.5. Higher ratios indicate disproportion and insufficient root system to supply the shoots of the plant. In this study, the values of this ratio were higher because the trays were soaked with copper to cause chemical root pruning, coupled with the effect of fertilizer doses that caused greater increases in height.

According to studies conducted by Sáenz, Villaseñor, Muñoz, Rueda, and Prieto (2010) and Rueda et al. (2014), the DQI was classified by specific ranges from 0.2 to 0.5, where values lower than 0.2 were considered low quality, between 0.2 and 0.5 medium quality, and higher than 0.5 high quality. Results indicate that treatment T8 had the highest DQI = 0.42, thus the quality of the plant can be classified as medium.

Aguilera-Rodríguez et al. (2020) mention in their research on field growth of P. patula, as an effect of root pruning and containers used in nursery, that with a dose of 8 g∙L-1 of Osmocote® Plus fertilizer (15-9-12) of eight to nine months of controlled release, quality plants are produced in nursery.

Field stage

Survival

Table 3 shows that the survival of the P. patula plantation in the three evaluations at 4, 9 and 12 months after establishment in the field, for each treatment, was higher than 72 % and the average survival in all treatments was 75 %. These values are higher than those reported by Mexal, Cuevas, and Landis (2008) in plantations established in Valle de México with the same species at 4, 10 and 26 months, obtaining 44, 33 and 27 % survival, respectively. However, the results are lower than those reported by Sosa-Pérez and Rodríguez-Trejo (2003), who reported 93 % survival 12 months after planting P. patula on a burned area.

Table 3 Average survival (n = 40 plants) of Pinus patula in the field at three evaluation times after planting. 

Treatments 4 months (%) 9 months (%) 12 months (%)
T1 (control) 97 90 90
T2 95 90 72
T3 95 85 78
T4 95 90 85
T5 100 90 75
T6 100 85 75
T7 100 85 85
T8 100 95 95

The formula of the treatments is shown in Table 1.

Survival was highest with treatment T8 (95 %), while the lowest values were found for T2 (72 %), T5 and T6 (both with 75 %); the last two treatments have the characteristic that they were additionally fertilized in the field. Trubat, Cortina, and Vilagrosa (2010) highlight that nutrient management in the nursery shows a strong potential to modify the morphology of Quercus suber L. seedlings, but the relationship between these changes and short-term seedling survival remains elusive, which can be confirmed in this research due to both environmental and plantation factors.

Nutrient content

Escobar-Alonso and Rodríguez-Trejo (2019) indicate that the recommended values of foliar concentration of nutrients as physiological indicators in Pinus species are: 1.4 to 2.2 % of N, 0.2 to 0.4 % of P and 0.4 to 1.5 % of K. In another study on plant quality indicators in native pines, Prieto and Sáenz (2011) propose the following concentrations of nutrients in foliage: 1.1 to 3.5 % of N, 0.1 to 0.6 % of P and 0.5 to 2.5 % of K. According to the described scales, quality plants were produced in this study according to Prieto and Sáenz (2011); as for the recommendations of Escobar-Alonso and Rodríguez-Trejo (2019), for N and P, quality plants were produced and in the case of P the concentrations were low. Binkley and Fisher (2019) have proposed that, generally, critical P concentrations are equivalent to 10 % of N concentrations and in this study, they are between 7 and 9 %.

According to Table 4, in all treatments, foliar N concentration increased as the nursery fertilizer rate increased, as reported by Sloan and Jacobs (2013), who analyzed controlled-release fertilizers in comparison with immediately available fertilizers and unfertilized controls in Picea glauca (Moench) Voss and Populus tremuloides Michx. They concluded that the usually higher levels of foliar N in the first year of planting were found in trees fertilized with higher rates of controlled-release fertilizers in the root zone.

In this research, treatment T4 had the highest percentage of N, followed by T8, while the plants fertilized in the field (T5, T6 and T7) showed a different behavior, being treatment T6 the one that assimilated the highest percentage of N. For P, there were no differences between the percentages contained in the plants, being in a range of 0.13 to 0.15 % in all treatments. K content in the plants also showed low variation, with treatments T1 and T7 being the ones with the highest and lowest percentages, respectively.

Table 4 Average concentrations (n = 4) per treatment of the main nutrients in the foliage of Pinus patula plants, nine months after planting in the field. 

Treatments N (%) P (%) K (%)
T1 (control) 1.65 0.15 0.66
T2 1.97 0.15 0.59
T3 2.08 0.14 0.61
T4 2.17 0.14 0.6
T5 1.72 0.15 0.63
T6 1.91 0.14 0.6
T7 1.79 0.13 0.55
T8 2.11 0.14 0.63

The formula of the treatments can be found in Table 1.

Plantation growth

According to the comparison made at the time of planting and after 12 months, the saplings of all treatments increased 71 cm in height on average (Figure 1) and 11.44 mm in diameter (Figure 2). Treatment T3 generated, on average, the greatest height (1.10 m) followed by T4 (1.09 m) and T8 (1.00 m); the first two treatments had the greatest height when leaving the nursery. Since the evaluation was only for one year, these values could be considered of good size if compared with those obtained by Aguilera-Rodríguez et al. (2020), who determined height growth of 1.54 and 1.47 m in P. patula, for two years in the field.

Similar results were found for diameter growth; plants in treatment T3 averaged 18.64 mm, followed by T4 and T8 with 18.32 and 17.67 mm, respectively.

Figure 1.  Average height growth of Pinus patula per treatment at field planting (light gray) and 12 months later (dark gray). The standard error of the mean is represented on the bars.  

Figure 2.  Average diameter growth of Pinus patula per treatment at field planting (light gray) and 12 months later (dark gray). The standard error of the mean is represented on the bars. 

Conclusions

The effect of fertilization was significant in Pinus patula. The combination of eight and 12 months-controlled release fertilizer doses in nursery generated plants with morphological characteristics suitable for establishment and high survival rates (72 to 100 %) in the early stages of development in the field. The additional fertilization applied at the time of field planting had no major effect on plant survival and development. Under the conditions of this research, the recommended dose for P. patula at nursery and field stage is 4 g∙L-1 of eight-month release fertilizer in combination with 4 g∙L-1 of 12-month release fertilizer.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) for the support to carry out this research; also, thanks to the Vargas family for their assistance in the GUMAIR nursery and thanks to Ing. Saúl Neri for his help in the establishment of the plantation.

References

Aguilera-Rodríguez, M., Aldrete, A., Vargas-Hernández, J. J., López-Upton, J., López-López, M. A., & Ordaz-Chaparro, V. M. (2020). Crecimiento en campo de Pinus patula Schltdl. & Cham. como efecto de la poda radicular y los contenedores utilizados en vivero. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 26(2), 307‒319. doi: 10.5154/r.rchscfa.2019.07.055 [ Links ]

Alcántar, G. G., & Sandoval, V. M. (1999). Manual de análisis químico de tejido vegetal: Guía de muestreo, preparación, análisis e interpretación. Chapingo, México: Sociedad Mexicana de la Ciencia del Suelo - Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. [ Links ]

Binkley, D., & Fisher, R. F. (2019). Ecology and management of forest soils. USA: Jhon Wiley & Sons. [ Links ]

Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA). (2019). Normales climatológicas-Servicio Meteorológico Nacional. Retrieved from https://smn.conagua.gob.mx/es/climatologia/informacion-climatologica/normales-climatologicas-por-estadoLinks ]

Comisión Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR). (2018). Informe de autoevaluación enero-diciembre de 2018. Retrieved from http://www.conafor.gob.mx:8080/documentos/docs/1/7635Informe%20de%20autoevaluaci%C3%B3n%20enero%20diciembre%202018.pdfLinks ]

Duryea, M. L. (1985). Evaluating seedling quality: principles, procedures, and predictive abilities of major tests. Corvallis, OR, USA: Oregon State University. [ Links ]

Escobar-Alonso, S., & Rodríguez-Trejo, D. A. (2019). Estado del arte en la investigación sobre calidad de planta del género Pinus en México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 10(55), 4‒38. doi: 10.29298/rmcf.v10i55.558 [ Links ]

Fu, Y., Oliet, J. A., Li, G., & Wang, J. (2017). Effect of controlled release fertilizer type and rate on mineral nutrients, non-structural carbohydrates, and field performance of Chinese pine container-grown seedlings. Silva Fennica, 51(2), article ID 1607. doi: 10.14214/sf.1607 [ Links ]

Grossnickle, S. C., & MacDonald, J. E. (2018). Seedling quality: History, application, and plant attributes. Forests, 9, 283. doi: 10.3390/f9050283 [ Links ]

Haase, D. L., Rose, R., & Trobaugh, J. (2006). Field performance of three stock sizes of Douglas-fir container seedlings grown with slow-release fertilizer in the nursery growing medium. New Forests, 31, 1-24. doi: 10.1007/s11056-004-5396-6 [ Links ]

Jackson, D. P., Dumroese, R. K., & Barnett, J. P. (2012). Nursery response of container Pinus palustris seedlings to nitrogen supply and subsequent effects on outplanting performance. Forest Ecology and Management, 265, 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.018 [ Links ]

Landis, T. D., Dumroese, R. K., & Haase, D. L. (2010). The container tree nursery manual. Seedling processing, storage and outplanting (vol. 7). Washington, DC, USA: USDA Forest Service. Retrieved from https://rngr.net/publications/ctnm/volume-7Links ]

Landis, T. D., & Dumroese, R. K. (2009). Using polymer-coated controlled-release fertilizers in the nursery and after outplanting. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237372027_Using_Polymer-coated_Controlled-release_Fertilizers_in_the_Nursery_and_After_OutplantingLinks ]

Mexal, J. G., Cuevas, R. R. A., & Landis, T. D. (2008). Reforestation success in central Mexico: factors determining survival and early growth. Tree Planters' Notes, 53, 16‒22. Retrieved from https://rngr.net/publications/tpn/index_htmlLinks ]

Oliet, J. A., Puértolas, J., Planelles, R., & Jacobs, D. F. (2013). Nutrient loading of forest tree seedlings to promote stress resistance and field performance: a Mediterranean perspective. New Forests, 44, 649‒669. doi: 10.1007/s11056-013-9382-8 [ Links ]

Prieto, R. J. A., & Sáenz, R. J. T. (2011). Indicadores de calidad de planta en viveros forestales de la Sierra Madre Occidental. Libro técnico núm. 3. Durango México: Campo Experimental Valle del Guadiana, Centro de Investigación Regional Norte Centro, INIFAP. [ Links ]

Prieto, R. J. A., García, R. J. L., & Mejía, B. J. M., Huchin, A. S., & Aguilar, V. J. L. (2009). Producción de planta del género Pinus en vivero en clima templado frío. Durango, México: Campo Experimental Valle del Guadiana, Centro de Investigación Regional Norte Centro, INIFAP. [ Links ]

Rodríguez, T. D. A. (2008). Indicadores de calidad de planta forestal. México: Mundi Prensa. [ Links ]

Rose, R., Haase, D., & Arellano, E. (2004). Fertilizantes de entrega controlada: potencial para mejorar la productividad de la reforestación. Bosque, 25(2), 89‒100. doi: 10.4067/s0717-92002004000200009 [ Links ]

Rueda, S., A., Benavides, S. J. de D., Sáenz, R. J. T., Muñoz, F. H. J., Prieto, R J. A., & Orozco, G. G. (2014). Calidad de planta producida en los viveros forestales de Nayarit. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 5(22), 58‒73. doi: 10.29298/rmcf.v5i22.350 [ Links ]

Sáenz, J. T. R., Villaseñor, R. F. J., Muñoz, F. H. J., Rueda, S. A., & Prieto, R. J. A. (2010). Calidad de planta en viveros forestales de clima templado en Michoacán. Uruapan, Michoacán, México: Campo Experimental Uruapan, Centro de Investigación Regional Pacífico Centro, INIFAP. Retrieved from https://docplayer.es/17222741-Calidad-de-planta-en-viveros-forestales-de-clima-templado-en-michoacan.htmlLinks ]

Secretaría de Economía. (2014). Norma Mexicana NMX-AA-170-SCFI-2014. Certificación de la operación de viveros forestales. México: Diario Oficial de la Federación. Retrieved from https://biblioteca.semarnat.gob.mx/janium/Documentos/Ciga/agenda/DOFsr/DO3430.pdfLinks ]

Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). (2002). Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-021-RECNAT-2000, Que establece las especificaciones de fertilidad, salinidad y clasificación de suelos. Estudios, muestreo y análisis. México: Diario Oficial de la Federación. Retrieved from http://www.ordenjuridico.gob.mx/Documentos/Federal/wo69255.pdfLinks ]

Sloan, J. L., & Jacobs, D. F. (2013). Fertilization at planting influences seedling growth and vegetative competition on a post-mining boreal reclamation site. New Forests, 44, 687‒701. doi: 10.1007/s11056-013-9378-4 [ Links ]

Sosa-Pérez G., & Rodríguez-Trejo, D. A. (2003). Efecto de la calidad de planta en la supervivencia y crecimiento de Pinus patula en un área quemada. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 9(1), 36‒43. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/629/62990104.pdf Links ]

Trubat, R., Cortina, J., & Vilagrosa, A. (2010). Nursery fertilization affects seedling traits but not field performance in Quercus suber L. Journal of Arid Environments, 74(4), 491‒497. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.10.007 [ Links ]

Wells, C., & Allen, L. (1985). A loblolly pine management guide: When and where to apply fertilizer. doi: 10.2737/SE-GTR-36 [ Links ]

Received: March 11, 2022; Accepted: September 30, 2022

*Corresponding author: aaldrete@colpos.mx; tel.: +52 595 101 1774

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License