SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.10 número37Capacitación masiva digital para la adquisición de conocimientos teóricos sobre COVID-19 en MéxicoTrabajo de campo virtual en investigación cualitativa índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Investigación en educación médica

versión On-line ISSN 2007-5057

Resumen

NAVARRO HERNADEZ, Nancy et al. Clinical Teaching Performance: Design and Validation of an Evaluation Instrument. Investigación educ. médica [online]. 2021, vol.10, n.37, pp.61-70.  Epub 06-Dic-2021. ISSN 2007-5057.  https://doi.org/10.22201/fm.20075057e.2021.37.20264.

Introduction:

Clinical teaching in the training of the health professional is essential, being carried out by professionals who do not necessarily have teaching training, who certify the acquisition of disciplinary and generic competences.

Objective:

To design and validate an instrument for to evaluate the performance of the clinical teacher.

Method:

Non-experimental, cross-sectional, descriptive research. The instrument was designed based on a literature review, qualitative exploration (4 focus groups of 10 students each and 4 in-depth interviews with clinical teachers), 31 items emerged related to the role of the clinical teacher. It was applied to 443 students of the Faculty of Medicine in the second semester of 2017, who signed informed consent and institutional authorization. The responses were collected on a Likert scale 1 (never) 5 (always). Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to validate the instrument's construct using robust methods (Satorra-Bentler), internal consistency through Cronbach's alpha coefficient

Results:

The instrument has a high Cronbach's alpha value of 0,97. Four factors were identified: (i) Personal qualities (8 items, α=0,88); (ii) Pedagogical skills (12 items, α=0,95); (iii) Evaluation skills (6 items, α=0,9) and (iv) Clinical Learning environment (5 items, α=0,77).

Conclusions:

The items of the instrument confirm the representativeness of the domains to be evaluated, so it has high evidence of validity and reliability in the four factors identified. This instrument will allow the clinical teacher to have feedback, on their performance by the students for improvement.

Palabras llave : Medical education; Educational evaluation; Students of the health professions.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )