SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 número3El debate legal y moral que conduce a la prohibición de la subrogación comercial en IndiaDerechos humanos, libre albedrío y neuroética. Retos biojurídicos de las neurotecnologías emergentes índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Medicina y ética

versión On-line ISSN 2594-2166versión impresa ISSN 0188-5022

Resumen

MONTANARI VERGALLO, Gian Luca  y  LUCA, Nagale Mario di. The push towards common european legislation with respect to the right to know one’s genetic origins. Med. ética [online]. 2019, vol.30, n.3, pp.985-1030.  Epub 21-Ago-2023. ISSN 2594-2166.

Twenty years since it was opened for signature, the Oviedo Convention needs updating. It does not deal with the issue of the donorconceived children’s right to know the identity of the gamete donors.

The European Court of Human Rights has recently stated that: a) the right to know one’s biological background is protected by article 8 of the Convention on Human Rights; b) such a right must be balanced with the biological mother’s right to anonymity (anonymous birth).

In order to find such balancing, a possible solution might be to require judges to summon mothers to ask them whether they would like to reverse their decision to be anonymous. If the mother reaffirms her intention to remain unknown, the court may not allow the child to learn of her identity and contact her.

The authors also analyze two other issues not taken into account by the European Court: a) the balancing between the right to know one’s origins and the gamete donors’ right to anonymity; b) whether the donor-conceived children’s right to know would make it mandatory for legal parents to disclose conception procedures.

These problems and the importance of the interests at stake induce the authors to argue that the choice to keep using the above mentioned article 8 as yardstick is far from ideal. It appears to be far preferable to deal with these issues while updating the Oviedo Convention or in such a way as to incentivize the enactment of legislation that would be uniform throughout the European Union.

Palabras llave : heterologous artificial insemination; right to know one’s genetic origins; right to anonymity; duty to disclose; Oviedo Convention; European Convention of Human Rights.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español | Inglés