SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.50 número148Fake Barns and Our Epistemological Theorizing índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Crítica (México, D.F.)

versión impresa ISSN 0011-1503

Resumen

VERDEJO, Víctor M.. Fully Understanding Concept Possession. Crítica (Méx., D.F.) [online]. 2018, vol.50, n.148, pp.3-27.  Epub 31-Mar-2020. ISSN 0011-1503.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2018.01.

Can subjects genuinely possess concepts they do not understand fully? A simple argument can show that, on the assumption that possession conditions are taken to fully individuate concepts, this question must be answered in the negative. In this paper, I examine this negative answer as possibly articulated within Christopher Peacocke’s seminal theory. I then discuss four central lines of attack to the view that possession of concepts requires full understanding. I conclude that theorists should acknowledge the existence of indefinitely many cases of genuine concept possession for partially understood concepts and therefore face the determination challenge, namely, the challenge of fully determining concept individuation from concept possession conditions of partially understood concepts.

Palabras llave : partial understanding; concept individuation; implicit conceptions; anti-individualism; determination challenge.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés