SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 número2Modelación de caudales en función de los macroporos del suelo en una microcuenca forestal de Durango, MéxicoPresencia de agentes potenciales causantes de infecciones subcutáneas humanas en suelo y plantas en el estado de Puebla, México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Terra Latinoamericana

versión On-line ISSN 2395-8030versión impresa ISSN 0187-5779

Resumen

GUTIERREZ CASTORENA, Ma. del Carmen et al. Soils of the area of influence of Santa María Asunción Codex and the pictorial representation. Terra Latinoam [online]. 2017, vol.35, n.2, pp.101-111. ISSN 2395-8030.

Although the Santa Maria Asunción Codex (SMAC) has been extensively studied, the soil survey on which it was based to interpret the glyphs of different kinds of land was performed outside the area of influence of the codex. Reinterpreting the glyphs of different land classes through a study of soils, geomorphology and parent materials is the objective of this research. Five neighborhoods that appear in the SMAC were studied, and the frequency of the glyphs in each one of them was quantified. Subsequently, plot-by-plot field visits were carried out and samples of soil and tuffs (tepetates) were collected for laboratory analysis and taxonomic classification. The results indicate that the area of influence of the SMAC is composed of Leptosols/Regosols (formed from rhyolite, andesite and tuffs), Anthrosols (terraces) and Fluvisols. The frequency of glyphs and type of soil indicated that Tepetatlalli (tepetates) can represent terraces, Xalallis granular peds (< 3 mm) and non-sandy soils; Tezoquilt subangular blocky/granular peds with hard and soft consistency (< 2 cm); Tlalcoztli dusty yellow land of low agricultural quality; and Atoctlis and Tezoquitl/Xalalli correspond to active and passive alluvial soils, respectively. The conclusion is that the Nahua classified their lands based on aggregate size, soil consistency, and origin (natural and artificial), and not on texture or color.

Palabras llave : Ethnoedaphology; soil classification; land classes; Anthrosols.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español