SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 número2Organización espacial y temporal de ensamblajes de insectos acuáticos en dos cuencas subtropicalesDiversidad de arqueas en ecosistemas estuarino-lagunares tropicales y subtropicales. Una síntesis índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Hidrobiológica

versión impresa ISSN 0188-8897

Hidrobiológica vol.32 no.2 Ciudad de México may./ago. 2022  Epub 26-Jun-2023

https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcbs/hidro/2022v32n2/tapia 

Artículos de investigación

Growth parameters and activity of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes of juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei fed diets containing aflatoxins and an aflatoxin binder

Parámetros de crecimiento y actividad de enzimas metabolizadoras de xenobióticos de juveniles de Litopenaeus vannamei alimentados con dietas conteniendo aflatoxinas y un secuestrante de aflatoxinas

Mireya Tapia-Salazar1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1048-9781

Oscar D. García-Pérez2  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1642-935X

Martha G. Nieto-López1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1000-4406

Julio C. Cruz-Valdez2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2832-7745

Maribel Maldonado-Muñiz1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4108-0954

Lucía E. Cruz-Suárez1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3808-2972

Alicia G. Marroquín-Cardona2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1648-6650

1Programa de Maricultura, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. Ciudad Universitaria Apdo Post F-67, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, 66050. México.

2Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. Francisco Villa s/n Col. Ex-Hacienda El Canadá, General Escobedo, Nuevo León, 66450. México.


ABSTRACT

Background

Shrimp farms are increasingly vulnerable to aflatoxin (AF) negative effects as frequent inclusion of plant-based ingredients is used in the diets.

Goals

Evaluate the impact of a bentonite-based AF binder on growth parameters, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and glutathione s-transferase (GST) activities of juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei shrimp fed AF contaminated diets for 42 days.

Methods

Juvenile shrimps were randomly assigned to the following study groups, including a non-contaminated diet (NCD), an AF contaminated diet (ACD), and ACD supplemented groups with either 1, 1.5 or 2 g/kg feed of Mycofix Plus (MyP), a clay-based mycotoxin binder that contains bentonite, enzymes, algae, and plants extracts.

Results

Shrimp from ACD had a significantly lower mean weight, growth rate, feed intake and nitrogen retention percentage when compared to shrimp from the NCD group. All MyP treatments resulted in similar mean weight, growth rate and nitrogen retention efficiency to NCD animals, at the same time, only the ACD + 1 and ACD + 1.5 MyP had ALP and GST activities similar than that of shrimp fed NCD. Interestingly, shrimp from ACD + 2 MyP had high ALP and GST activities, even higher than the ACD animals.

Conclusions

MyP protected shrimp from adverse AFs effects, however, at the highest dose, it increased metabolic enzyme activities, likely due to other bioactive compounds present in MyP.

Keywords: Aflatoxins; binder; growth; mycotoxin; shrimp

RESUMEN

Antecedentes

Las granjas camaroneras son cada vez más vulnerables a los efectos negativos de las aflatoxinas (AF), ya que se utilizan con frecuencia ingredientes de origen vegetal en las dietas.

Objetivos

Evaluar los efectos de un secuestrante de AF a base de bentonita sobre los parámetros de crecimiento y la actividad de las enzimas fosfatasa alcalina (ALP) y glutatión S-transferasa (GST) en juveniles de camarón Litopenaeus vannamei alimentados con dietas contaminadas con AF durante 42 días.

Metodos

Los camarones se asignaron aleatoriamente a los siguientes grupos de estudio, que incluyeron una dieta no contaminada (NCD), una dieta contaminada con AF (ACD) y grupos suplementados con ACD y conteniendo 1, 1.5 o 2 g/kg de alimento de Mycofix Plus (MyP), un aglutinante de micotoxinas a base de arcilla que contiene bentonita, enzimas, algas y extractos de plantas.

Resultados

Los camarones de ACD tuvieron un peso medio, una tasa de crecimiento, un consumo de alimento y un porcentaje de retención de nitrógeno significativamente más bajos en comparación con los camarones del grupo NCD. Todos los tratamientos MyP dieron como resultado un peso medio, una tasa de crecimiento y una eficiencia de retención de nitrógeno similares a los camarones alimentados con NCD, mientras que solo ACD + 1 y ACD + 1.5 MyP tuvieron actividades ALP y GST similares a las de los camarones alimentados con NCD. Curiosamente, los camarones de ACD + 2 MyP tenían altas actividades de ALP y GST, incluso más altas que los animales ACD.

Conclusiones

MyP protegió a los camarones de los efectos adversos de las AF; sin embargo, en la dosis más alta, aumentaron las actividades de las enzimas metabólicas probablemente debido a otros compuestos bioactivos presentes en MyP.

Palabras claves: aflatoxinas; secuestrante; crecimiento; micotoxinas; camarón

INTRODUCTION

The high plant feedstuff inclusion levels influence the existence of mycotoxicosis in aquaculture production in finished feeds (Gonçalves et al., 2020). Aspergillus spp., Penicillium spp., and Fusarium spp. are the main fungal species responsible for most mycotoxins present in meals (Kabak, 2009; Freire & Da-Rocha, 2017). Recent reports of a mycotoxin survey revealed the presence of aflatoxin (AF), zearalenone, T-2 toxin, and deoxynivalenol in numerous feedstuff samples (21,709) collected from 79 countries, from which it was concluded that 6.5 samples out of 10 had at least one of the mentioned mycotoxins above the threshold levels, and 87% of the test samples contained ten or more mycotoxins and metabolites, being AF the most found (Biomin, 2021a). The incidence of mycotoxins is said to be influenced by harvest and storage conditions. For instance, hot and humid environments are the main factors that promote fungal contamination and toxin production (Saad, 2016). Particularly for Aspergillus species, temperature between 25 and 35ºC are known to promote AF development (Daou et al., 2021). These conditions can occur in most aquaculture facilities. Several studies have demonstrated up to 24 different types of mycotoxins (including metabolites) in raw ingredients and complete fish feeds (Koletsi et al., 2021). Deoxynivalenol, AF, zearalenone, ochratoxin, fumonisin B1, fumonisin B2, fusaric acid, ergotamine, and deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside were the most predominant mycotoxins (Gonçalves et al., 2017; Koletsi et al., 2021).

The effects of feeding mycotoxin contaminated diets to fish and shrimp has resulted in significant reduction in feed consumption and growth rate, immune suppression, liver lesions, alterations of phase I xenobiotic biotransformation enzymes such as cytochrome P450 (CYP450) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), phase II enzymes such as gluthatione S-tranferase (GST) and mortality (Santacroce et al., 2008; Ghaednia et al., 2013; Mahfouz & Sherif, 2015; Pérez-Acosta et al., 2016; Zeng et al., 2016; Tapia-Salazar et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2018). From all mycotoxins, aflatoxins (AFs) are particularly important due to their toxicity and carcinogenic effects (IARC, 2012). Aflatoxin B1 is considered one of the most toxic compounds for terrestrial and aquatic species (Mohamed et al., 2017). Different strategies had been developed to reduce the toxic effect of mycotoxin consumption, such as physical decontamination, chemical decontamination, and biological decontamination (Daou et al., 2021). Earlier studies showed that the use of AF binders such as mixtures of aluminosilicate minerals and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) yeast cell walls; mixtures of glucomannans from cell walls of S. cerevisiae with Chlorella vulgaris cell walls; as well as mixtures of bentonite (a montmorillonite rich mineral), Trichosporon mycotoxinivorans yeast and algae extracts included at levels that the manufacturing industry recommends can improve but not revert toxic effects of diets contaminated with 75 µg/kg AFs on shrimp (Tapia-Salazar et al., 2017). Tapia-Salazar et al. (2017) observed that feeding diets containing AF + 2.5 g/kg MyP resulted in a similar feed intake to the CD diet. The inclusion levels for MyP used for these authors were selected from terrestrial studies due to the lack of information on aquatic organisms. Therefore, more information related to the effectivity of Mycofix Plus® (MyP), to reduce aflatoxicosis at lower inclusion levels in shrimp is required. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the protective effects of different levels of MyP on white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (L. vannamei) fed 200 μg/kg AF-contaminated diet in terms of growth rate, survival, feed conversion ratio and the enzymatic activity of ALP and GST after 42 feeding days.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preparation of contaminated corn: The AF contamination of corn was performed at the Nutek S.A. de C.V. company facilities in Tehuacan, Puebla, Mexico. The contamination protocol followed methods previously described by Tapia-Salazar et al. (2012). Spores from Aspergillus parasiticus were inoculated onto white corn grains inside an Erlenmeyer flask and then placed in an incubator at 25°C for 7 days. Contaminated corn was then sterilized for 30 min at 120°C, left to dry for 5 days in a biosafety recirculation hood, then milled with a grinder and passed through a steel sieve with an opening size of 850 µm (ASTM mesh #20). Total AFs were measured with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) following the official AOAC method 994.08 (AOAC, 2007).

Preparation of experimental diets: To assure optimal growth of juvenile shrimp, a non-contaminated control diet (NCD) containing 40% crude protein and 7% lipid content was prepared with wheat flour (43%), soybean meal (8%) and shrimp meal (4%) as main ingredients. The AF contaminated diet (ACD) was prepared by adding 10.9% of contaminated cornmeal in substitution for the wheat flour. The AF content in ACD (200 μg/kg) was based on a previous study where a significant reduction in shrimp growth, feed intake, and survival was observed (García-Pérez et al., 2020). Three more experimental diets were prepared with ACD complemented with 1, 1.5 or 2 g of MyP per kg of diet. Briefly, the ingredients for diet preparation were ground in a CyclotecTM 1093 sample mill (Foss-Tecator, Denmark) to obtain an average particle size of 500 μm, after milling, the ingredients were mixed with soy lecithin and fish oil for 10 min in a Kitchen Aid mixer and then warm water (30%) was added to be mixed for 15 more min. Finally, the dough was processed through a grinder (fitted with a metal screen with 1.6 mm hole diameter) at a 40 min/kg passage rate at 75ºC. The pellets were then dried in a convection oven at 100ºC for 8 min and were left to cool overnight before placing on Ziploc bags. The chemical composition of experimental diets (Table 1) was calculated using previously reported methods (Cruz-Suárez et al., 2009). Total AFs in the diet were measured by a fluorometer method using AflaTest® immunoaffinity columns (VICAM, Milford, MA). Columns can detect the four most common AFs expected to be found in feed, such as AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, and AFG2. Proximate analysis on diets was done to determine dry matter (%) and water absorption (%) following methods previously reported (García-Pérez et al., 2013).

Table 1 Composition and proximate analysis of experimental diets for juvenile white shrimp 

NCD ACD ACD+ 1 MyP ACD+ 1.5 MyP ACD+ 2 MyP
Formula (g/kg)
Wheat meal 431.26 431.47 435.18 434.59 434.1
Fish meal 380.18 379.97 387.87 387.99 388.06
Soybean meal 80 80 67.4 67.45 67.34
Constant ingredients† 97.6 97.6 97.6 97.6 97.6
Non-contaminated corn 10.953 --- --- --- ---
Contaminated corn --- 10.953 10.953 10.953 10.953
MyP --- --- 1 1.5 2
Total 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00
Chemical composition (% dry matter)
Moisture
Protein 42.6 ± 0.3 42.5 ± 0.09 42.1 ± 0.2 42.2 ± 0.2 42.2 ± 0.3
Crude lipids 7.3 ± 0.3 7.3 ± 0.4 7.2 ± 0.3 7.4 ± 0.3 7.3 ± 0.4
Fiber 2.9 ± 0.02 2.9 ± 0.1 2.6 ± 0.03 2.5 ± 0.09 2.8 ± 0.2
Ash 10.4 ± 0.01 10.6 ± 0.1 10.4 ± 0.02 10.5 ± 0.1 10.9 ± 0.02

†Constant ingredients (g/kg): shrimp meal 40, fish oil 20, soy lecithin 20, alginic acid 10, vitamin mixture 3.5, mineral mixture 2.5, antioxidant 0.5, mold inhibitor 0.5, cholesterol 0.2, vitamin C 0.2 and vitamin E 0.2

Vitamin mixture composition: retinol, 4000 IU/g; thiamin, 24 g/kg; riboflavin, 16 g/kg; DL Ca pantothenate, 30 g/kg; pyridoxine, 30 g/kg; cyanocobalamin, 80 mg/kg; ascorbic acid, 60 g/kg; menadione, 16 g/kg; cholecalciferol, 3200 IU/g; tocopherol, 60 g/kg; biotin, 400 mg/kg; niacin, 20 mg/kg; folic acid, 4 g/kg.

Mineral mixture composition: Co, 2 g/kg; Mn, 16 g/kg; Zn, 40 g/kg; Cu, 20 g/kg; Fe, 1 mg/kg; Se, 100 mg/kg; I, 2 g/kg.

Animal study conditions: Juvenile shrimp of L. vannamei species were maintained in a closed recirculation system containing artificial seawater (Fritz®, Dallas, TX, USA) using a 350 mL/min flow-through rate. Each tank was equipped with an air-water lift system for internal recirculation. All tanks were interconnected to achieve the same conditions simultaneously. The study did not require ethical approval to develop research with invertebrates as it is unnecessary by the Mexican regulations. However, studies were developed adhering to maintenance and euthanasia protocols reported for decapods (Approved protocols for decapods, cephalopods, and fish, 2018; Leary et al., 2020). Water temperature and salinity were measured daily while pH, ammonium, nitrates, and nitrites, were measured weekly.

Shrimp source and feeding protocol: For this study, juvenile shrimp were obtained from Municipio de Rosario, Sinaloa, Mexico, through a donation by a local farm. Upon arrival, shrimp were acclimated for 4 days in 500 L tanks. After acclimation, shrimp were individually weighed (75 mg average initial weigh) and allocated to 15 tanks (12 shrimp per tank). Five study groups were formed as follows: NCD, ACD, ACD + 1, 1.5, or 2 g of MyP per kg of diet, and each group had three replicates. Replacement animals were kept in a tank and when necessary, dead shrimp were replaced over the first three days after distributing the animals in each study group. Shrimp were kept on 12/12 light/dark cycle conditions for 42 feeding days. The initial feeding ratio was based on a 20% total biomass found in each tank. Feeding protocol and calculation of feeding rate were based on previous research (Tapia-Salazar et al., 2012). Shrimp were fed 3 times a day (8:00 am, 12:00 pm and 5:00 pm); siphoned leftover feed from the tank before the new fresh feed was provided. Pelleted feed was broken down into small crumbs to ensure meal was available to all shrimp.

Growth parameters: During the experiment, shrimp from each experimental group were individually weighed at 0, 14, 28, and 42 days using a digital scale. The amount of feed provided per tank was adjusted every two weeks after shrimp weight. Before weighing, excess water in shrimp was removed with a cotton cloth. Survival and feed consumption were recorded daily; appropriate feed adjustments were done considering the remaining shrimp and leftover feed in each tank, every day. Growth rate, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio, and survival rate were calculated by using formulas described by García-Pérez et al. (2013). A sample of shrimp (10 g) from the replacement tank was taken at time 0 and at the end of the experiment to measure water and nitrogen content in shrimp tissue. Shrimp samples for nitrogen content were freeze-dried and then ground in a mill. Calculation of nitrogen retention efficiency was done according to the following formula:

AFW g ×FCP % -AIW g×ICPC %CCP g×100

Were:

AFW

Average final weight

FCP

Final crude protein in carcass

AIW

Average initial weight

ICPC

Initial crude protein in carcass

CCP

Consumed crude protein

Enzymatic activity biomarkers: At the end of the experiment, hepatopancreas samples of three shrimp from each tank were taken to measure ALP and GST activities. Hepatopancreas samples were homogenized in double distilled water at 4 ºC in a 1:10 proportion (sample weight:water, m/v) with a mortar and pestle for 4 minutes. Then homogenized samples were centrifuged at 2000 g for 15 minutes at 4 ºC, and the supernatant was aliquoted into 0.1 mL Eppendorf tubes and stored at -70 ºC until use. Protein content in tissue extracts was quantified using Bradford method and bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a calibration curve (Bradford, 1976). ALP activity was determined by using p-nitrophenyl phosphate (substrate). The reaction was performed using 200 µL of diethanolamine buffer (1.0 M) with 50 mM MgCl2 (pH 9.8), then 10 µL of the enzymatic extract and 10 µL of the substrate were added at a final concentration of 0.4 mM. Absorbance was immediately registered at 405 nm in 120-second intervals for up to 10 minutes in an EPOCH microplate reader (Biotek, Vermont, USA). For each sample, three analytical replications were conducted. The sample was replaced with a buffer in control wells. The linearity of the reaction was verified, and the enzymatic activity was expressed as μmol/min/mg protein using p-nitrophenol molar extinction coefficient of 18.5 mM/cm (Mazorra et al., 2002). GST activity was analyzed using the Habig et al., (1974) method adapted to microplates. A volume of 300 μL of a substrate mixture containing reduced L-glutathione (200 mM) and 1-chloro-2, 4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB; 100 mM) in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (2.7 mM KCl, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, 136.9 mM NaCl and 8.9 mM Na2HPO4•7H2O, pH 7.2) along with 10 μL of hepatopancreas extract were added into each well. Absorbance was immediately read at 340 nm every minute for 10 minutes. GST activity was expressed as μmol/min/mg protein, using a molar extinction coefficient of 9.6 mM/cm for CDNB (Brodeur et al., 2011).

Statistical analysis: Statistical analyses were done using SSPS software (version 16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois). Average body weight per tank was used to calculate the growth rate and feed conversion ratio. Normality of data was not verified as it is not required for sample size ≥ 25 (Van den Berg, 2022). Homoscedasticity (homogeneity of variances) was verified with Levene´s test. The test variables (growth parameters and enzymatic activity) were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA test and then followed by Tukey´s multiple comparisons tests to detect significant differences among experimental groups (p <0.05).

RESULTS

Experimental diets: Chemical composition of the experimental diets was similar among treatments (Table 1). The concentration of total AFs in ACD was 200 µg/kg while NCD did not show detectable levels of AFs (Limit of detection=1 ng AF/kg diet). Values of dry matter loss and water absorption capacity of diets are presented in Table 2. One-way ANOVA showed that MyP addition at 1.5 and 2 g/kg had a higher reduction of water absorption (p = 0.001) while NCD had a significantly lower dry matter loss when compared to ACD and ACD + 1.5 diets (p < 0.001) but not significantly different from ACD + 1 MyP or ACD + 2 MyP.

Table 2 Dry matter loss (DML) percentage and water absorption capacity (WA) of experimental diets. 

Experimental diet DML (%) WA (%)
NCD 16.1 ± 0.01a 182 ± 3.6c
ACD 18.1 ± 0.7bc 164 ± 20bc
ACD+1 MyP 17.3 ± 0.1ab 141 ± 6b
ACD+1.5 MyP 19.3 ± 0.3c 104 ± 4a
ACD+2 MyP 16.9 ± 1.1ab 109 ± 10a
SEM 0.32 8.45
Sig. 0.001 0.001

Data presented are the means ± standard deviations. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences among groups with Tukey mean comparisons (p < 0.05).

Animal study conditions and growth parameters: Water condition parameters (mean ± standard deviation) were maintained during the study with the following values recorded for salinity 35 ± 3 g/L, temperature 30 ± 2 ºC, pH 8.1 ± 0.1, ammonium 0 mg/L, nitrites 0.2 mg/L, and nitrates 40 ± 15 mg/L. Shrimp final growth parameters such as weight, feed intake, growth rate, feed conversion ratio, survival (%) and nitrogen retention efficiency (%) are presented in Table 3. When compared to NCD, one-way ANOVA showed that shrimp consuming ACD had a significant reduction in growth, feed intake and nitrogen retention efficiency (p < 0.05). Interestingly, shrimp from all MyP groups had mean weight, growth rate and nitrogen retention efficiency similar to animals from NCD. Particularly, animals feed with ACD + 2 MyP showed no differences (p < 0.05) in mean weights, feed intake, growth rate, or nitrogen retention efficiency when compared to animals from NCD group. However, animals with the low and medium dose of MyP (i.e., 1 and 1.5 g of MyP) did not reach significance to be different from animals on ACD. No significant differences were observed for feed conversion ratio or survival. An apparent improvement in feed intake was noted due to MyP addition to ACD, however, only the 2 g/ kg inclusion of MyP showed a significant difference among study groups, resulting on a higher average feed intake of 3.8 g compared to the 2.9 g observed in ACD group. Regarding the growth rate, shrimp that consumed ACD + 2 MyP had higher growth compared to the shrimp fed with ACD (2980% vs 2185% respectively), and it was similar to the growth rate of shrimp consuming NCD (2964%). Nitrogen retention efficiency was lower for the shrimp consuming ACD (21.7%) than that for shrimp of NCD and ACD+2 MyP groups (35.6% and 35.01% respectively), animals from these treatment groups had the highest nitrogen retention values (p=0.007).

Table 3 Growth parameters of white shrimp fed non-contaminated diet (NCD) or aflatoxin-contaminated diet (ACD) supplemented with MyP 

Experimental diet Mean weight (g) Feed intake (g/shrimp) Growth rate (%) Feed conversion ratio Survival (%) Nitrogen retention efficiency (%)
NCD 2.34 ± 0.17b 4.07 ± 0.2c 2964 ± 234b 2.59 ± 0.1 97.2 ± 4.8 35.6 ± 3.6b
ACD 1.73 ± 0.1a 2.99 ± 0.1a 2185 ± 137a 3.07 ± 0.1 97.2 ± 4.8 21.7 ± 2.3a
ACD+1 MyP 1.92 ± 0.2ab 3.3 ± 0.2ab 2432 ± 274ab 2.88 ± 0.3 100 ± 0 29.4 ± 3.3ab
ACD+1.5 MyP 2.02 ± 0.3ab 3.24 ± 0.2ab 2500 ± 489ab 2.76 ± 0.6 94.4 ± 4.9 29.5 ± 2.9ab
ACD+2 MyP 2.33 ± 0.8b 3.84 ± 0.07bc 2980 ± 137b 2.3 ± 0.1 91.6 ± 8.4 35.01 ± 1.6b
SEM 0.078 0.211 104 0.101 1.37 1.62
Sig. 0.023 0.008 0.025 0.123 0.415 0.007

Data presented are the means ± standard deviations. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences with Tukey mean comparisons (p < 0.05)

Enzymatic activity: Shrimp fed with ACD had a higher ALP and GST activity than organisms fed with NCD (Figure 1). Regarding ALP, the shrimp from ACD + 1 MyP and ACD + 1.5 MyP groups had the lowest enzymatic activity values and were similar to the shrimp from the NCD group. On the contrary, the shrimp from the ACD + 2 MyP group showed the highest enzyme activity value, and this difference was significant when compared to all other treatment groups (p < 0.05). GST activity did not result in significant differences among the ACD + 1 MyP and ACD + 1.5 MyP groups, however, shrimp belonging to the ACD + 2 MyP group had the highest enzyme activity among all treatment groups, including the ACD group (p < 0.05). Overall, a trend of increased activity was observed for both enzymes as higher concentrations of MyP were present in the diets.

Figure 1 ALP and GST enzymatic activities from juvenile of shrimp L. vannamei consuming either NCD, ACD or ACD supplemented with MyP at 1, 1.5 or 2 g/kg feed. 

DISCUSSION

The current study showed that ACD consumption by shrimp for a 42-day period resulted in significant reductions in growth parameters such as mean weight, feed intake, growth rate, and nitrogen retention efficiency. These results are consistent with those published in previous studies where consumption of AFs resulted in evident adverse effects in shrimp of the same species and age, and under similar experimental conditions (Tapia-Salazar et al., 2012; García-Perez et al., 2020), and in shrimp of similar species such as Penaeus monodon (Bautista et al., 1994; Gopinath & Paul-Raj, 2009). The recurring dietary exposure to AFs exerts a substantial impact on shrimp farming, causing subclinical symptoms that subsequently result in impaired health status, followed by decreased production efficiency (Wang et al., 2018). In livestock production, the addition of mycotoxin binders or AFs adsorbents to the diets is an economical strategy to prevent the negative effects caused by the presence of these toxins in feed (Farooqui et al., 2019). According to Neeratanaphan & Tengjaroenkul (2018), the use of Thai bentonite has been shown to improve weight gain, survival rate, red blood cell counts and alanine aminotransferase enzyme in white shrimp feed diet supplemented with 0.5% bentonite when compared to those fed toxin contaminated diet only (150 ppb AFB1). Most mineral-based binders claim to be effective for AF sorption and this has been supported by in vitro and in vivo studies where montmorillonites (Ramos & Hernández, 1996), and zeolites (Piva et al., 1995) have shown a high in vitro binding affinity for AFs, and hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicates (HSCAS) (Döll et al., 2005) and bentonites (Schell et al., 1993) have proven to reduce the harmful effects of this toxin on performance parameters in other species such as pigs. Some mycotoxin binders are also formulated with a variety of other ingredients including antioxidants, probiotics, yeast, or plant materials that may improve their effectiveness (Tapia-Salazar et al., 2017). That is the case of MyP which is also described as a mycotoxin deactivator (Hanif et al., 2008). Since the adsorption of AF to mineral binders is essentially a surface phenomenon, its effectiveness depends on several physical characteristics such as pore size and distribution, total charge, and charge distribution (Di-Gregorio et al., 2014). In the present study, shrimp that were fed diets supplemented with MyP had increased mean weight, feed intake, growth rate and nitrogen retention efficiency, while the shrimp that consumed the ACD + 2MyP presented significant differences when compared with the shrimp fed with ACD. Regarding cost-benefits, by using our FCR data, an approximate price of 32 Mexican pesos (Mxp) for a regular 1 kg of shrimp diet, and 0.22 Mxp as the approximate cost of 1 g of MyP, the cost of production of 1 kg of shrimp with a regular shrimp diet contaminated with AF (200 µg/kg) and complemented with 1, 1.5 or 2 g/kg MyP has an average estimate of 85 Mxp, similar to the cost of production using non-contaminated diet (83 Mxp), and contrarily to what is expected for shrimp only ingesting AF contaminated diet (98.24 Mxp).

The use of mycotoxin binder or deactivator products has been successfully used in terrestrial animals to prevent the effect of consuming AFs (Hussain et al., 2017; Kehinde et al., 2018; Nazarizadeh & Pourreza, 2019; Saleemi et al., 2020), however, in aquaculture, few studies have used mixed-nature adsorbents that contain ingredients that are known to modulate xenobiotic biotransformation enzymes. Agouz & Anwer (2011) found an increase in growth and survival in common carp (Cyrpinus carpio) supplemented with a synthetic probiotic-immunostimulant product (Biogenâ) and a commercial smectite clay composed of an activated, broad-spectrum HSCAS (Myco-Adâ) in a diet contaminated with 22 ppb AF and 15 ppb ochratoxin. Other studies showed that shrimp ingesting a diet with 75 μg AF/kg and supplemented with 2.5 g/kg MyP, improved the growth rate, although not significantly (Tapia-Salazar et al., 2017). The reasons for the differences found between the Tapia-Salazar et al. (2017) study and our current study are likely related to the different AFs contamination levels (75 µg/kg AFs vs 200 µg/kg), dietary inclusion amounts of MyP product (2.5 g/kg diet vs 1, 1.5 and 2 g/kg diet), as well as the average initial weights of the organisms used (210 mg vs 76 mg).

Regarding enzymatic activity, the present study found an increase in ALP and GST activities in shrimp fed with ACD when compared to those fed with NCD. The increase in enzymatic activity due to the consumption of AF is consistent with previous results observed in the aquatic organisms (Mahfouz & Sherif, 2015; Manal, 2016). ALP is a hepatopancreatic enzyme involved in detoxification, elevated ALP activity is found in the hepatopancreas when this organ needs to metabolize large amounts of xenobiotics (Boonyaratpalin et al., 2001). Previous works (García-Pérez et al., 2020) showed that ALP activity can increase in shrimp consuming aflatoxins (200 ppb) when compared to animals consuming non-contaminated diet (58.4 µmol/min/mg protein vs 41.3 µmol/min/mg protein, respectively). Contrarily, some studies show a reduction in hepatopancreas ALP activity in enzyme extracts incubated with AFB1 (Perez-Acosta et al., 2016), however, in vitro data may not reflect what occurs in vivo. Increased GST activity has also been shown in shrimp exposed to AFB1 at levels as low as 15 ppb (Zhao et al., 2017). Clearly, increased activity of both enzymes can be beneficial to shrimp that are exposed to AFB1-contaminated diets.

Interestingly, in the current study, shrimp from ACD + 1 MyP and ACD + MyP 1.5 did not show significant differences in ALP activity when compared to animals from NCD group. Thus, highlighting the beneficial effects of dietary inclusion of MyP at either 1 or 1.5 g/kg inclusion. MyP is a clay-based feed additive frequently used as an AF adsorbent. The mineral components belong to the aluminosilicate group, specifically, the bentonite type (rich in montmorillonite), according to the manufacturer. Bentonites have a high capacity for AF adsorption (Thieu & Pettersson, 2008) and the mechanisms of toxin adsorption have been described as chemisorption on mineral surfaces (Grant & Phillips, 1998) or physisorption with the interlayer cations (Deng et al., 2010). Upon binding, a complex toxin-mineral is formed thus reducing AF bioavailability from the gastrointestinal tract (Ramos & Hernández, 1997), which may prevent hepatopancreas damage and the consequent changes in ALP and GST enzyme activity.

Among treatments, the shrimp belonging to the ACD + 2 MyP group had the highest values of both enzymes, even higher than shrimp fed ACD. It is known that MyP contains a proprietary blend of plant and algae extracts said to support liver function (Biomin, 2021b). For instance, Abdel-Rahim et al., (2021) reported that when feeding juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei with 500 mg/kg of Sargassum polycystum algae supplemented feed, the ALP activity showed a higher mean of 8.80 U/L compared to the 6.33 U/L mean registered for control animals (no-algae supplemented feed). The source of algae in MyP is not known (undisclosed for patent protection) but seaweed and macroalgae are a rich source of bioactive compounds (Thanigaivel et al., 2014), and some have hepatoprotective activity (Schleder et al., 2018). Hence, we proposed that the inclusion of MyP at 1 and 1.5 g/kg inclusions were able to maintain ALP and GST enzymatic activities similar to those values observed for control animals. However, at a higher inclusion of MyP (2 g / kg), other bioactive compounds present in this product may stimulate hepatopancreas xenobiotic metabolic functions resulting on increased ALP and GST enzyme activities.

CONCLUSION

Feeding MyP to juvenile L. vannamei shrimp ingesting 200 µg/kg of AF was able to reduce the negative effects exerted by the toxin on growth parameters and on enzymatic activities. Overall health and performance of all shrimp ingesting MyP were similar that animals fed NCD. This was especially observed in animals with the high dose of MyP (2 g/kg). Additionally, the high dose of MyP (2 g/kg) resulted in enzymatic ALP and GST activities higher than all other groups, including control animals and animals fed ACD suggesting a further hepatopancreas xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes stimulation caused by other bioactive compounds in MyP. Further studies can be directed to identify the specific bioactive compounds on MyP and to delineate if there is an additive or synergistic effect on MyP ingredients and AF on ALP and GST enzymes.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Authors thank the funding provided by SEP-PRODEP project 103.5/15/6797 and PAICyT CT293-15 UANL research program.

REFERENCES

Abdel-Rahim, M., O. Bahattab, F. Nossir, Y. Al-Awthan, R. H. Khalil & R. Mohamed. 2021. Dietary supplementation of brown seaweed and/or nucleotides improved shrimp performance, health status and cold-tolerant gene expression of juvenile whiteleg shrimp during the winter season. Marine Drugs 19(3): 175. [ Links ]

Agouz, H.M. & W. Anwer. 2011. Effect of Biogen® and Myco-Ad® on the growth performance of common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) fed a mycotoxin contaminated aquafeed. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 6(3): 334-345. [ Links ]

Animal Ethics Sub-Committee. 2018. Approved protocols for decapods, cephalopods, and fish. Ethics Committee of University of KwaZulu-Natal. Available online at: Available online at: http://research.ukzn.ac.za/Libraries/Research_Document/Guidelines_-_Protocols_for_Decapods_Cephalopods_and_Fish_2018.sflb.ashx.%20 (downloaded October 12, 2021). [ Links ]

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). 2007. Official Methods of Analysis 2007-04. Available online at: Available online at: http://sutlib2.sut.ac.th/sut_contents/H125800.pdf (downloaded February 12, 2021). [ Links ]

Bautista, M.N., C. R. Lavilla-Pitogo, P. F. Subosa & E. T. Begino. 1994. Aflatoxin B1 contamination of shrimp feeds and its effect on growth and hepatopancreas of pre-adult Penaeus monodon. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 65(1): 5-11. [ Links ]

Biomin. 2021a. World Mycotoxin Survey : Impact 2021. Available online at: Available online at: https://www.biomin.net/science-hub/world-mycotoxin-survey-impact-2021/ (downloaded October 16, 2021) [ Links ]

Biomin. 2021b. The science behind mycofix. Available online at: Available online at: https://www.biomin.net/solutions/mycotoxin-risk-management/mycotoxin-deactivation/mycofix-plus/ (downloaded October 16, 2021) [ Links ]

Boonyaratpalin, M., K. Supamattaya, V. Verakunpiriya & D. Suprasert. 2001. Effects of aflatoxin B1 on growth performance, blood components, immune function, and histopathological changes in black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon Fabricius). Aquaculture Research 32: 388-398. [ Links ]

Bradford, M.M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical biochemistry 72: 248-254. [ Links ]

Brodeur, J.C., R. P. Suarez, G. S. Natale, A. E. Ronco & M. E. Zaccagnini. 2011. Reduced body condition and enzymatic alterations in frogs inhabiting intensive crop production areas. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 74: 1370-1380. [ Links ]

Cruz-Suárez, L. E., M. Tapia-Salazar, D. Ricque-Marie, M.G. Nieto-Lopez & C. Guajardo-Barbosa. 2009. A comparison of the kelps Macrocystis pyrifera and Ascophyllum nodosum and Enteromorpha (Ulva clathrata) as ingredients in shrimp feed. Aquaculture Nutrition 15: 421-430. [ Links ]

Daou, R., K. Joubrane, R. G. Maroun, L. R. Khabbaz, A. Ismail & A. El Khoury. 2021. Mycotoxins: Factors influencing production and control strategies. AIMS Agriculture and Food 6(1): 416-447. [ Links ]

Deng, Y., A. L. Barrientos-Velázquez, F. Billes & J. B. Dixon. 2010. Bonding mechanisms between aflatoxin B1 and smectite. Applied Clay Science 50(1): 92-98. [ Links ]

Di-Gregorio, M.C., D. V. D. Neeff, A. V. Jager, C. H. Corassin, A. C. D. P. Carão, R. D. Albuquerque & C. A. F. Oliveira. 2014. Mineral adsorbents for prevention of mycotoxins in animal feeds. Toxin Reviews 33(3): 125-135. [ Links ]

Döll, S., S. Gericke, S. Dänicke, J. Raila, K. H. Ueberschär, H. Valenta, U. Schnurrbusch, F. J. Schweigert & G. Flachowsky. 2005. The efficacy of a modified aluminosilicate as a detoxifying agent in Fusarium toxin contaminated maize containing diets for piglets. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 89(9-10): 342-358. [ Links ]

Farooqui, M.Y., A. Khalique, M. A. Rashid, S. Mehmood & M. I. Malik. 2019. Aluminosilicates and yeast-based mycotoxin binders: Their ameliorated effects on growth, immunity and serum chemistry in broilers fed aflatoxin and ochratoxin. South African Journal of Animal Science 49(4): 619-627. [ Links ]

Freire, F. D. C. O. & M. E. B. Da Rocha. 2017. Impact of mycotoxins on human health. Fungal Metabolites 239-261. [ Links ]

García-Pérez, O.D., M. Tapia-Salazar, M.G. Nieto-López, D. Villarreal-Cavazos, L. E. Cruz-Suárez & D. Ricque-Marie. 2013. Effectiveness of aluminosilicate-based products for detoxification of aflatoxin-contaminated diets for juvenile Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Ciencias Marinas 39(1): 1-13. [ Links ]

García-Pérez, O.D., M. Tapia-Salazar, M. G. Nieto-López, J. C. Cruz-Valdez, M. Maldonado-Muñiz, L. M. Guerrero-Guerrero, L. E. Cruz-Suárez & A. G. Marroquín-Cardona. 2020. Effects of conjugated linoleic acid and curcumin on growth performance and oxidative stress enzymes in juvenile Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) feed with aflatoxins. Aquaculture Research 51(3): 1051-1060. [ Links ]

Ghaednia, B., M. Bayat, I. Sohrabi-Haghdoost, A. A. Motallebi, A. Sepahdari, M. Mirbakhsh & M. R. Mehrabi. 2013. Effects of aflatoxin B1 on growth performance, health indices, phagocytic activity, and histopathological alteration in Fenneropenaeus indicus. Iran Journal fish science 12(4): 723-737 [ Links ]

Gonçalves, R.A., D. Schatzmayr, A. Albalat & S. Mackenzie. 2020. Mycotoxins in aquaculture: feed and food. Reviews in Aquaculture 12(1): 145-175. [ Links ]

Gonçalves, R.A., D. Schatzmayr, U. Hofstetter & G. A. Santos 2017. Occurrence of mycotoxins in aquaculture: preliminary overview of Asian and European plant ingredients and finished feeds. World Mycotoxin Journal 10(2): 183-194. [ Links ]

Gopinath, R. & R. Paul-Raj. 2009. Histological alterations in the hepatopancreas of Penaeus monodon Fabricius (1798) given aflatoxin B1-incorporated diets. Aquaculture Research 40(11): 1235-1242. [ Links ]

Grant, P.G. & T.D. Phillips. 1998. Isothermal adsorption of aflatoxin B1 on HSCAS clay. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 46(2): 599-605. [ Links ]

Habig, W.H., M. J. Pabst & W. B. Jacoby 1974. Glutathione S-transferases: the first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. Journal of biological Chemistry 249: 7130-7139. [ Links ]

Hanif, N. Q., G. Muhammad, M. Siddique, A. Khanum, T. Ahmed & J. A. Gadahai G. Kaukab. 2008. Clinico-pathomorphological, serum biochemical and histological studies in broilers fed ochratoxin A and a toxin deactivator (Mycofix Plus). British Poultry Science 49(5): 632-642. [ Links ]

Hussain, D., A. Mateen & D.M. Gatlin III. 2017. Alleviation of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) toxicity by calcium bentonite clay: Effects on growth performance, condition indices and bioaccumulation of AFB1 residues in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 475: 8-15. [ Links ]

IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 2012. monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, volume 100 F. Chemical Agents and Related Occupations. Lyon, France Available online at: Available online at: https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Iarc-Monographs-On-The-Identification-Of-Carcinogenic-Hazards-To-Humans/Chemical-Agents-And-Related-Occupations-2012 (downloaded February 19, 2013) [ Links ]

Kabak, B. 2009. The fate of mycotoxins during thermal food processing. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 89: 549-554. [ Links ]

Kehinde, H.W., A. A. Sekoni, T. S. Olugbemi & P. A. Onimisi. 2018. Prevalence of aflatoxin b1 in some common poultry feed ingredients and optimum inclusion levels of mycofix binder as feed additive on performance of broiler chickens. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production 45(2): 137-149. [ Links ]

Koletsi, P., J. W. Schrama, E. A. Graat, G. F. Wiegertjes, P. Lyons & C. Pietsch. 2021. The Occurrence of mycotoxins in raw materials and fish feeds in Europe and the potential effects of deoxynivalenol (DON) on the health and growth of farmed fish species. Toxins 13(6): 403. [ Links ]

Leary, S., W. Underwood, R. Anthony, S. Cartner, T. Grandin, C. Greenacre & E. Patterson-Kane. 2020. AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2020 Edition. American Veterinary Medical Association Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 67-74. [ Links ]

Mahfouz, M.E. & A. H. Sherif. 2015. A multiparameter investigation into adverse effects of aflatoxin on Oreochromis niloticus health status. The Journal of Basic & Applied Zoology 71: 48-59. [ Links ]

Manal, I. 2016. Detoxification and antioxidant effects of garlic and curcumin in Oreochromis niloticus injected with aflatoxin B1 with reference to gene expression of glutathione peroxidase (GPx) by RT-PCR. Fish physiology and biochemistry 42(2): 617-629. [ Links ]

Mazorra, M., J. Rubio & J. Blasco. 2002. Acid and alkaline phosphatase activities in the clam Scrobicularia plana: kinetic characteristics and effects of heavy metals. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 131: 241-249. [ Links ]

Mohamed, H.M., W. F. Emeish, A. Braeuning & S. Hammad. 2017. Detection of aflatoxin-producing fungi isolated from Nile tilapia and fish feed. EXCLI journal 16: 1308-1318. [ Links ]

Nazarizadeh, H. & J. Pourreza. 2019. Evaluation of three mycotoxin binders to prevent the adverse effects of aflatoxin B1 in growing broilers. Journal of Applied Animal Research 47: 135-139. [ Links ]

Neeratanaphan, L. & B. Tengjaroenkul. 2018: Potential of Thai bentonite to ameliorate aflatoxin B1 contaminated in the diet of the Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Livestock Research for Rural Development 30: 174. [ Links ]

Pérez-Acosta, J.A., A. Burgos-Hernandez, C. A. Velázquez-Contreras, E. Márquez-Ríos, W. Torres-Arreola, A. A. Arvizu-Flores & J. M. Ezquerra-Brauer. 2016. An in vitro study of alkaline phosphatase sensitivity to mixture of aflatoxin B1 and fumonisin B1 in the hepatopancreas of coastal lagoon wild and farmed shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Mycotoxin research 32: 117-125. [ Links ]

Piva, G., F. Galvano, A. Pietri & A. P. A. R. D. Piva.1995. Detoxification methods of aflatoxins. A review. Nutrition Research 15(5): 767-776. [ Links ]

Ramos, A.J. & E. Hernandez. 1996. In vitro aflatoxin adsorption by means of a montmorillonite silicate. A study of adsorption isotherms. Animal Feed Science and Technology 62(2-4): 263-269. [ Links ]

Ramos, A.J. & E. Hernandez. 1997. Prevention of aflatoxicosis in farm animals by means of hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate addition to feedstuffs: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 65(1-4): 197-206. [ Links ]

Saad, M.2016. Antinutritional factors and mycotoxins as natural hazards threaten food safety. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology 10: 57-61 [ Links ]

Saleemi, M.K., K. Ashraf, S. T. Gul, M. N. Naseem, M. S. Sajid, M. Mohsin, C. Heb, M. Zubair & A. Khan. 2020. Toxicopathological effects of feeding aflatoxins B1 in broilers and its amelioration with indigenous mycotoxin binder. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety 187: 109712. [ Links ]

Santacroce, M.P., M. C. Conversano, E. Casalino, O. Lai, C. Zizzadoro, G. Centoducati & G. Crescenzo. 2008. Aflatoxins in aquatic species: metabolism, toxicity, and perspectives. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 18: 99-130. [ Links ]

Schell, T.C., M. D. Lindemann, E. T. Kornegay, D. J. Blodgett & J. A. Doerr. 1993. Effectiveness of different types of clay for reducing the detrimental effects of aflatoxin-contaminated diets on performance and serum profiles of weanling pigs. Journal of animal science 71(5): 1226-1231. [ Links ]

Schleder, D.D., L. G. B. Peruch, M. A. Poli, T. H. Ferreira, C. P. Silva, E. R. Andreatta, L. Hayashi & V. F. Do Nascimento. 2018. Effect of brown seaweeds on pacific white shrimp growth performance, gut morphology, digestive enzymes activity and resistance to white spot virus. Aquaculture 495: 359-365. [ Links ]

Tapia-Salazar, M., O. D. García-Pérez, M. G. Nieto-López, D. Villarreal-Cavazos, J. Gamboa-Delgado, L. E. Cruz-Suárez & D. Ricque-Marie. 2017. Evaluating the efficacy of commercially available aflatoxin binders for decreasing the effects of aflatoxicosis on Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Hidrobiológica 27(3): 411-418. [ Links ]

Tapia-Salazar, M., O. D. García-Pérez, R. A. Velásquez-Soto, M. G. Nieto-López, D. Villarreal-Cavazos, D. Ricque-Marie & L. E. Cruz-Suárez. 2012. Growth, feed intake, survival, and histological response of white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei fed diets containing grains naturally contaminated with aflatoxin. Ciencias Marinas 38(3): 491-504. [ Links ]

Thanigaivel, S., S. Vijayakumar, A. Mukherjee, N. Chandrasekaran & J. Thomas. 2014. Antioxidant and antibacterial activity of Chaetomorpha antennina against shrimp pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Aquaculture 433: 467-475. [ Links ]

Thieu, N.Q. & H. Pettersson. 2008. In vitro evaluation of the capacity of zeolite and bentonite to adsorb aflatoxin B 1 in simulated gastrointestinal fluids. Mycotoxin research 24(3): 124-129. [ Links ]

Van den Berg, R.G. 2022. SPSS One-Way ANOVA Tutorial. Available online at: Available online at: https://www.spss-tutorials.com/spss-one-way-anova/ . (downloaded July 18, 2022). [ Links ]

Wang, Y., B. Wang, M. Liu, K. Jiang, M. Wang & L. Wang. 2018. Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) induced dysregulation of intestinal microbiota and damage of antioxidant system in pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Aquaculture 495: 940-947. [ Links ]

Yu, Y. Y., J. Niu, P. Yin, X. Mei, Y. J. Liu, L. X. Tian & D. H. Xu. 2018. Detoxification and immunoprotection of Zn (II)-curcumin in juvenile Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) feed with aflatoxin B1. Fish & shellfish immunology 80: 480-486. [ Links ]

Zeng, S.L., W. Q. Long, L. X. Tian, S. W. Xie, Y. J. Chen, H. J. Yang & Y. J. Liu. 2016. Effects of dietary aflatoxin B1 on growth performance, body composition, haematological parameters, and histopathology of juvenile Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Aquaculture Nutrition 22(5): 1152-1159. [ Links ]

Zhao, W., L. Wang, M. Liu, K. Jiang, M. Wang, G. Yang, C. Qi & B. Wang. 2017. Transcriptome, antioxidant enzyme activity and histopathology analysis of hepatopancreas from the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei fed with aflatoxin B1 (AFB1). Developmental & Comparative Immunology 74: 69-81. [ Links ]

Received: June 21, 2022; Accepted: July 21, 2022

*Corresponding author: Oscar D. García-Pérez: e-mail: oscar.garciapr@uanl.edu.mx

To quote as: Tapia-Salazar, M., O. D. García-Pérez, M. G. Nieto-López, J. C. Cruz-Valdez, M.Maldonado-Muñiz, L. E. Cruz-Suárez & A. G. Marroquín Cardona. 2022. Growth parameters and activity of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes of juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei fed diets containing aflatoxins and an aflatoxin binder. Hidrobiológica 32 (2): 141-148.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License