Resumen

TOMIO, Fabricio Ricardo De Limas; FILHO, Ilton Norberto Robl  y  KANAYAMA, Rodrigo Luis. Conflicts by abstract judicial review in Brazil, Spain, Italy, Mexico and Portugal. Cuest. Const. [online]. 2017, n.36, pp.301-325. ISSN 1405-9193.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484881e.2017.36.10867.

This article empirically analyzes the decisions of the Constitutional Courts in Abstract Judicial Review, with the objective to determine the role of Judicial Review in those Democratic States and the extent of this control comparing Brazil, Spain, Italy, Mexico and Portugal. Important data are presented about composition of the judges and legitimates to propose Constitutional Actions. The central point of the text lies in presenting an overview about the Abstract Judicial Review and the impact on national and subnational conflicts. Preliminary findings indicate that, in the majority compared States, the Constitutional Jurisdiction maintaining or increasing the powers of the central or national government.

Palabras llave : Abstract Judicial Review; Constitutional Jurisdiction; Political Institutions; Comparative Method.