SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 número3Oreganón, perejil, cilantro, hierbabuena y albahaca a través de difracción de rayos xAsociación entre la composición corporal, fuerza explosiva y algunos parámetros de desempeño físico en los jugadores del rugby sevens universitario índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Biotecnia

versión On-line ISSN 1665-1456

Biotecnia vol.25 no.3 Hermosillo sep./dic. 2023  Epub 27-Mayo-2024

https://doi.org/10.18633/biotecnia.v25i3.2026 

Artículos

Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in slaughtered broiler chickens in Paraguay

Prevalencia y resistencia antimicrobiana de Campylobacter jejuni y Campylobacter coli en pollos parrilleros de una planta frigorífica en Paraguay

Liz Aurora Castro Rojas1  * 

Jonatan M. Del Solar-Velarde2 

Natalie Weiler3 

Veronica Orrego3 

Diego Sosa-Argaña4 

Fredi L. Álvarez5 

1Departamento de Genética y Zootecnia, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay.

2Animal Science Department, Center for Agrarian Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), São Cristovão, Sergipe, Brazil.

3 Laboratorio Central de Salud Pública, Ministerio de Salud Pública y Bienestar Social, Asunción, Paraguay.

4 Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay.

5 Departamento de Clínicas Veterinarias, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay.


Abstract

Campylobacteriosis is one of the main zoonotic diseases transmitted through food, particularly chicken meat and its derivatives, which are relevant sources of transmission to humans. This study aimed to ascertain both prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in Cobb 500TM broiler chickens from a slaughterhouse in Paraguay. From 300 cloacal swab samples collected randomly, microbiological analysis were performed followed by bacterial confirmation through molecular polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Campylobacter spp. prevalence was 63.6 %, with 97.3 % corresponding to C. jejuni and 2.7 % to C. coli. Bacterial susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and erythromycin was determined using the E-test®. Resistance to ciprofloxacin was observed in 85 % of C. jejuni and in 100 % of C. coli isolates. Erythromycin resistance was identified in only one C. jejuni issolate (0.5 %). This research highlights the significance of C. jejuni prevalence and resistance to ciprofloxacin. These findings underscore the public health risk associated with chicken meat consumption, possibly containing antibiotic-resistant Campylobacter species. Hence, the necessity of implementing health control measures, concerning antibiotic treatments in poultry production can be emphasized.

Keywords: Poultry; antimicrobials; Campylobacter spp; food pathogens; PCR; public health

Resumen

La campylobacteriosis es una de las principales enfermedades zoonóticas transmitidas por los alimentos, en particular la carne de pollos parrilleros y sus derivados, representando fuentes importantes de transmisión a los humanos. Esta investigación tuvo como objetivo verificar la prevalencia y resistencia antimicrobiana de Campylobacter jejuni y Campylobacter coli en pollos parrilleros Cobb 500TM de una planta frigorífica en Paraguay. A partir de 300 muestras de hisopado cloacal colectadas aleatoriamente, fueron realizados análisis microbiológico seguido de confirmación por reacción en cadena de la polimerasa (PCR). La prevalencia Campylobacter spp. fue de 63.6 %, con 97.3 % correspondiente a C. jejuni y 2.7 % a C. coli. La susceptibilidad antimicrobiana a la ciprofloxacina y eritromicina fue determinada por E-test®. La resistencia a la ciprofloxacina fue de 85 % en aislados de C. jejuni y en 100 % de C. coli. La resistencia para la eritromicina fue encontrada en un aislado de C. jejuni (0.5 %). Este trabajo alerta valores relevantes de resistencia a la ciprofloxacina y de alta prevalencia de C. jejuni. Estos resultados informan el riesgo que representa, para la salud pública, el consumo de carne de pollos parrilleros contaminada con especies de Campylobacter resistentes a antibióticos. Por lo tanto, puede ser enfatizada la necesidad de implementar medidas de control sobre la utilización de antibióticos en la producción avícola.

Palabras clave: avicultura; Campylobacter spp; patógenos de alimentos; PCR; salud pública

Introduction

Poultry industry represents one of the primary sectors in the Paraguayan economy, with an exponential growth in the number of poultry farms dedicated to broiler chickens production (Rojas et al., 2010). This is directly related to the increase of local poultry meat consumption, which is even higher than that of beef and pork (USAID, 2010). However, technological advances have intensified exploitation systems, favoring proliferation and dissemination of crucial pathogens for public health, with birds as important reservoirs of zoonotic microorganisms. In poultry production, antimicrobial agents are massively used, not only as growth promoters but also for diseases prevention and control (Zendehbad et al., 2015).

Campylobacteriosis is recognized as one of the most important gastric diseases in the world, characterized by diarrhoea, abdominal pain and fever in humans (Hungaro et al., 2015; Silva et al., 2016; Borck et al., 2016; Seliwiorstow et al., 2016). This disease is produced by thermophilic bacteria of the genus Campylobacter, among which Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli are the most associated species with frequent humans infection (Prachantasena et al., 2016). In broilers, scientific evidence have shown that campylobacteriosis prevalence is very high, reaching over 70 % (Saleha, 2002; Hue et al., 2011; Saiyudthong et al., 2015). However, some countries such as Italy, China, Czech Republic and Brazil reported lower prevalence values, between 32.7 and 63.1 % (Bardon et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2010; Giacomelli et al., 2012; Zendehbad et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2016). In this context, contaminated chicken meat represents the main transmission source for Campylobacteriosis to humans (Robyn et al., 2015; Abu-Madi et al., 2016).

Besides this, antibiotics are used in poultry for campylobacteriosis treatment, including macrolides and fluoroquinolones, such as erythromycin and ciprofloxacin, respectively (Payot et al., 2006). However, literature has demonstrated antimicrobial resistance to cyprofloxacin, tetracycline, nalidixic acid in some Campylobacter strains, fact that implies real sanitary risks to human health (Jamali et al., 2015; Wieczorek et al., 2015). Furthermore, antibiotic resistance in humans has been also observed. The literature argue that antibiotic resistance behaviour is linked with high campylobacteriosis prevalence in poultry farms, making the human population vulnerable due to the increased chicken meat consumption (Mäesaar et al., 2016). Thus, the objective of this study was to verify the prevalence of C. jejuni and C. coli in broilers from the Central Department of Paraguay and to evaluate their antimicrobial susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and erythromycin.

Material and methods

Fecal samples collection and management

Cloacal swabs samples in chicken broilers was carried out with non-invasive procedures, without entering the birds’ body cavity, at the slaughter installations. All the prevailing local, national and international regulations and conventions, as well as normal scientific ethical practices, were respected.

A total of 300 samples of cloacal swabs from Cobb 500TM broiler chickens of approximately 38 to 41 days of life were randomly collected. The samples were obtained from six different slaughter lots of a cold storage chamber located in Paraguay. Feces were collected before slaughter using sterile cotton swabs and transported in Cary-Blair medium (Oxoid, Dardilly, France).

Campylobacter spp. isolation and identification

Cloacal swabs samples were analyzed at the Laboratorio de Diagnóstico de los Animales Domésticos, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de Asunción. Bacterial culture consisted in direct sowing the swabs samples in Campylobacter Agar Preston enrichment medium (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK), and then incubated in microaerophilic atmosphere with commercial CampyGen™ kit (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) at 42 °C during 48 h. Suspected colonies were collected on base blood agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) and incubated at 42 °C for ٢٤ h. After incubation, petri dishes were examined for identification of Campylobacter spp (Silva et al., 2016). Identification at species level was performed by catalase test, indoxyl acetate hydrolysis, hippurate hydrolysis, and susceptibility to nalidixic acid and cephalothin (Ingresa-Capaccioni et al., 2015) and then confirmed by multiplex PCR (WHO, 2007).

DNA extraction for Campylobacter spp. identification and PCR conditions

Genomic DNA was extracted using a modified protocol of bacterial cell lysis, according to Giacomelli et al. (2012). The reaction mixture conformed the final volume of 25 μL, containing 2.5 μL Buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl 10X), 1 μL Cl2Mg (50 mM), 2 μL of each dNTP (2.5 mM), 2.5 μL of each primer (10 μM), 0.25 μL of Taq polymerase (5U / μL Invitrogen™, USA), 4.25 μL of molecular quality water and 5 μL template DNA (100 ng/μL). The oligonucleotide sequence of each primer was previously described by Vandamme et al. (1997), for Campylobacter spp. identification, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Primers used in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to identify Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in fecal samples from slaughtered broiler chickens in Paraguay.  

Tabla 1. Iniciadores utilizados en la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa (PCR) para identificar Campylobacter jejuni y Campylobacter coli en muestras fecales de pollos parrilleros en Paraguay. 

Target species Target genea Primer sequence (5' → 3') Product size (bp)
Campylobacter jejuni Random F: CA TCT TCC CTA GTC AAG CCT R: AAG ATA TGG CTC TAG CAA GAC 773
Campylobacter coli Random F: AG GCA AGG GAG CCT TTA ATC R: TAT CCC TAT CTA CAA ATT CGC 364

a Assay performed as a multiplex reaction for detection of both C. jejuni and C. coli. F=Forward; R= Reverse

Bacterial DNA was amplified in a C1000™ thermocycler (BIO-RAD, Singapore) with the following amplification conditions: Initial denaturation of 94 °C during for minutes, eight cycles of one minute at 94 °C, with a decreacing gradient of 2 °C every two cycles, beginning with 64 °C and 72 °C; followed by 30 cycles at 94 °C, 54 °C and 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension stage at 72°C for 10 min (WHO, 2007).

Therefore, PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in 2 % agarose gel at 100 V and 400 mA for 40 min, in Tris-Acetate-EDTA (TAE 1X), and stained with ethidium bromide to be visualized on Digidoc-It® Imaging System (UVP, Canada). The reference strains used were C. jejuni ATCC 29428 and C. coli ATCC 33559.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) to ciprofloxacin and erythromycin were assessed by E-test® (AB Biodisk, Sweden) using Mueller-Hinton agar, under microaerophilic atmosphere at 37 °C during 48 h (Albert, 2013), at the Laboratorio Central de Salud Pública, Ministerio de Salud Pública y Bienestar Social. The cut-off points were interpreted according to CLSI M45-2 document (CLSI, 2012), where MIC of ≤ 8 is considered as sensitive, 16 as intermediate and ≥ 32 as resistant strain for Erythromycin; and for Ciprofloxacin, when ≤ 1 is considered as sensitive, 2 as intermediate and ≥ 4 as resistant strain. C. jejuni ATCC 29428 strains were included in the experimental assay for quality control.

Statistical analyses

To investigate C. jejuni and C. coli prevalence in different batches of Cobb 500TM broiler chickens, non-parametric ANOVA with sensitive and resistant samples was used within each batch. The samples in each batch, ractor considered as fixed effect, were used to asses differences between possitive (1) and negative (0) porcentages for Campylobacter spp. trough a generalized linear model (GLM) with binomial distribution. Each sample was considered as random effect. Statistical analyses were executed using R (R Core Team, 2016) with lme4 package (Bates et al., 2015) considering 5 % of significance level (p < 0.05).

Results and discussion

Table 2 shows the absolute frequencies of Campylobacter spp. found in the current study. From the 300 samples, 191 (63.6 %) were positive for Campylobacter spp., 186 (97.3 %) of which corresponded to C. jejuni and 5 (2.7 %) to C. coli. Furthermore, Figure 1 evidence the electrophoresis gel from C. jejuni and C. coli, as result from PCR identification.

Table 2 Frequency (n) and percentage (%) of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli prevalence found by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), from fecal samples of slaughtered broiler chickens in Paraguay (N = 300). 

Tabla 2. Frecuencia (n) y porcentaje (%) de la prevalencia de Campylobacter jejuni y Campylobacter coli, determinada mediante la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa (PCR), de muestras fecales de pollos parrilleros en Paraguay (N= 300). 

Samples Campylobacter
Batch N Positive Negative jejuni coli
A 50 42 (84.0) 8 (16.0) 42 (100.0) /
B 50 40 (80.0) 10 (20.0) 40 (100.0) /
C 50 15 (30.0) 35 (70.0) 15 (100.0) /
D 50 26 (52.0) 24 (48.0) 25 (96.2) 1 (3.8)
E 50 40 (80.0) 10 (40.0) 39 (97.5) 1 (2.5)
F 50 28 (56.0) 22 (44.0) 25 (89.2) 3 (10.8)
Total 300 191 (63.6) 119 (36.4) 186 (97.3) 5 (2.7)

Figure 1 PCR agarose electrophoresis gel of bacterial DNA samples from fecal samples, obtained in slaughtered broiler chickens in Paraguay. Lane M: 100 bp molecular weight marker. Lanes 1 to 10: Campylobacter jejuni positive samples. Lane 11: Campylobacter jejuni positive control. Lane 12: Campylobacter coli positive control. Lane 13: Negative control.  

Figura 1. Gel de electroforesis en agarosa de PCR a partir de DNA bacteriano de muestras fecales, obtenidas de pollos parrilleros en Paraguay. Carril M: Marcador de tamaño molecular de 100 bp. Carriles 1 a 10: Muestras positivas a Campylobacter jejuni. Carril 11: Control positivo de Campylobacter jejuni. Carril 12: Control positivo de Campylobacter coli. Carril 13: Control negativo. 

Particulary, the differences between C. jejuni and C. coli prevalence values, could be related to the fact that poultry chicken are hosts of C. jejuni and that they serve as a reservoir for this pathogen (Sahin et al., 2002; Lee and Newell, 2006) and, there is evidence for the season of the year influencing C. jejuni and C. coli sprouts, resulting in largest numbers of C. jejuni cases in spring (Wieczorek et al., 2020), coinciding with the results of the current work, considering that the samples were obtained from October to December (spring), therefore, the largest cases of C. coli are present in autumn.

Prevalence studies were developed in countries with relevant meat produciton from poultry farming. In commercial broiler chickens production from Brazil, Malaysia, and the United Kingdom, high Campylobacter spp. prevalence were found, ranging from 58 to 95 % in fecal samples (Saleha, 2002; Yew et al., 2010; Colles et al., 2011; Silva et al., 2016). In the same context, Italy and Spain commercial broiler chicken produciton showed prevalence values between 65 to 61.9 %, respectively (Giacomelli et al., 2012; Ingresa-Capaccioni et al., 2015), which are similar to those found in this research. Other studies showed lower values found in samples of cecal content (37.1 and 35.9 %), meat (18.9 %) and broiler carcasses (16.8 %) (Chen et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2016; Mäesaar et al., 2016). These differences can be attributed to the type of sample, bacterial isolation procedures, DNA extraction methods, primers sequences used for PCR, management practices or broiler chickens age sampled.

At species level, this research verified that C. jejuni prevalence was higher than C. coli. The same relation has been widely described (Bardon et al., 2009; Hungaro et al., 2015; Saiyudthong et al., 2015; Mäesaar et al., 2016). In contrast, Wang et al. (2016) found percentages of C. coli positive samples in broiler chickens, slightly higher when compared to C. jejuni in the same samples; as well as in commercial pigs with 98.7 % for C. coli and 1.2 % for C. jejuni. In studies developed in human faecal samples, C. jejuni prevalence was higher than C. coli (Thakur et al., 2010; Rivera et al., 2011; Tamborini et al., 2012; Quetz et al., 2016).

The present work found a high antimicrobial resistance to ciprofloxacin (85 %) while resistance to erythromycin was very low (0.5 %) (p < 0.05). (Table 3).

Table 3 Frequency (n) and percentage (%) of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli antimicrobial susceptibility, obtained from fecal samples of slaughtered broiler chickens in Paraguay (N = 191). 

Tabla 3. Frecuencia (n) y porcentaje (%) de susceptibilidad antimicrobiana de Campylobacter jejuni y Campylobacter coli, obtenida de muestras fecales de pollos parrilleros en Paraguay (N= 191). 

Campylobacter jejuni Campylobacter coli
Ciprofloxacin Erythromycin Ciprofloxacin Erythromycin
Batch Sensitive Resistant Sensitive Resistant Sensitive Resistant Sensitive Resistant
A 21 (50.0)a 21 (50.0)a 42 (100) / / / / /
B 2 (5.0))b 38 (95.0)a 40 (100) / / / / /
C / 15 (100.0) 15 (100) / / / / /
D 1 (4.0))b 24 (96.0)a 25 (100) / / 1 (100) 1 (100) /
E 2 (5.0))b 37 (95.0)a 39 (100) / / 1 (100) 1 (100) /
F 2 (8.0))b 23 (92.0)a 24 (96.0)a 1 (4.0))b / 3 (100) 3 (100) /
Total 28 (15.0))b 158 (85.0)a 185 (99.5)a 1 (0.5))b / 5 (100) 5 (100) /

a,b Rows with different superscripts letters are significantly different (p<0.05)

In broiler chickens, there is scientific evidence showing resistance to ciprofloxacin, with values ranging from 60.2 to 99.5 % in C. jejuni and 44.4 % to 100 % in C. coli; and to erythromycin, with values ranging from 1 % to 98.3 % in C. jejuni and 33.3 to 100 % in C. coli (Bardon et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2010; Yew et al., 2010; Zendehbad et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2016; Mäesaar et al., 2016). The main cause of the high C. jejuni ciprofloxacin resistance in the present study could be due to genetic and environmental effects. On one hand, C. jejuni does not have one of the main action target sites of Topoisomerase IV, due to a punctual gene mutation, allowing it to show high resistance to ciprofloxacin; and also, it could be related to the indiscriminate use of antimicrobials in poultry industry (Orrego et al., 2014). Furtermore, one of the batches sampled in the present research, batch A, showed C. jejuni isolates with similar percentage between sensitive and resistant strains (p > 0,05), provably due to the slaughter of animals with less antibiotical use as growing promoter when compared to the other batches, with more than 90 % of the samples resistant to ciprofloxacin (p < 0,05), fact that could be related to the massive use of this antibiotic, aiming to treat and prevent of diseases, as well as growth promoters in broiler chickens commercial production (McDermott et al., 2002; Gouvêa et al., 2015)

In C. jejuni isolates of human origin, resistance to ciprofloxacin have been found to be between 68 % and 65 % (Tamborini et al., 2012; Mäesaar et al., 2016). Increased resistance to erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and tetracyclines has also been found in isolates from patients with diarrhoea, limiting their use for health treatment in humans (Albert, 2013). This is important for public health, since these antibiotics are commonly used for humans campylobacteriosis treatment (Wieczorek et al., 2015). In the present study, a single C. jejuni isolate was found to be resistant to both antibiotics. Several authors have described antibiotic multiresistance of C. coli when compared to C. jejuni, probably due to the intrinsic capacity of the microorganism to develop resistance to antibiotics (Zhao et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2010), wich was not observed in the present work, possibly due to the standarized poultry management in broiler chicken farms from Paraguay, sharing similar animal and antibiotic handling and production paterns.

Conclusions

This research demonstrated the presence of thermotolerant Campylobacter species, mainly C. jejuni and C. coli, in cloacal swabs from broiler chickens. The isolates studied showed high C. jejuni resistance to ciprofloxacin. This work provides unprecedented information on the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter species from a slaughtered broiler chickens of Paraguay.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest with regard to the work presented in this report.

References

Albert, M.J. 2013. In vitro susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni from Kuwait to tigecycline & other antimicrobial agents. Indian J Med Res. 137: 187-190. [ Links ]

Abu-Madi, M., Behnke, J.M., Sharma, A. and Al-Banna, N. 2016. Prevalence of Virulence/Stress Genes in Campylobacter jejuni from Chicken Meat Sold in Qatari Retail Outlets. PloS One.11: e0156938. [ Links ]

Bardon, J., Kolar, M., Cekanova, L., Hejnar, P. and Koukalova, D. 2009. Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni and its Resistance to Antibiotics in Poultry in the Czech Republic. Zoonoses Public Health. 56: 111-116. [ Links ]

Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, and Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67(1):1-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.18637/ jss.v067.i01 [ Links ]

Borck, B., Sommer, H.M., Larsen, L.S., Sørensen, A.I.V., David, B., Hofshagen, M. and Rosenquist, H. 2016. Farm specific risk factors for Campylobacter colonisation in Danish and Norwegian broilers. Prev Vet Med. 130: 137-145. [ Links ]

Chen, X, Naren G-W, Wu C-M, Wang Y, Dai L, Xia L-N., Luo, P., Zhang, Q., and Shen, J. 2010. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter isolates in broilers from China. Vet Microbiol. 144: 133-139. [ Links ]

CLSI. 2012. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard. Ninth Edition. 2012. Approved Standard M07-A9. CLSI. [ Links ]

Colles, F.M, McCarthy, N.D., Layton, R. and Maiden, M. 2011. The prevalence of Campylobacter amongst a free-range broiler breeder flock was primarily affected by flock age. PLoS One. 6: e22825. [ Links ]

Giacomelli, M., Andrighetto, C., Rossi, F., Lombardi, A., Rizzotti, L., Martini, M. and Piccirillo, A. 2012. Molecular characterization and genotypic antimicrobial resistance analysis of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from broiler flocks in northern Italy. Avian Pathol. 41: 579-588. [ Links ]

Hue, O., Allain, V., Laisney, M-J., Le Bouquin, S., Lalande, F., Petetin, I., Rouxel, S., Quesne, S., Gloaguen, P., Picherot, M., Santolini, J., Bougeard, S., Salvat, G. and Chemaly, M. 2011. Campylobacter contamination of broiler caeca and carcasses at the slaughterhouse and correlation with Salmonella contamination. Food Microb. 28: 862-868. [ Links ]

Gouvêa, R., Santos, F.F. dos, Aquino, M.H.C., and Pereira, V.L de A. 2015. Fluoroquinolones in industrial poultry production bacterial resistance and food residues: a review. Braz J Poult Sci. 17 (1): 1-10. [ Links ]

Hungaro, H.M., Mendonça, R.C.S., Rosa, V.O., Badaró, A.C.L., Moreira, M.A.S. and Chaves, J.B.P. 2015. Low contamination of Campylobacter spp. on chicken carcasses in Minas Gerais state, Brazil: Molecular characterization and antimicrobial resistance. Food Control. 51: 15-22. [ Links ]

Ingresa-Capaccioni, S., González-Bodí, S., Jiménez-Trigos, E., Marco-Jiménez, F., Catalá Vega, S. and Marin, C. 2015. Comparison of different sampling types across the rearing period in broiler flocks for isolation of Campylobacter spp. J Poult Sci. 94: 766-771. [ Links ]

Jamali, H., Ghaderpour, A., Radmehr, B., Chuan Wei, K.S., Chai, L.C. and Ismail, S. 2015. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter species isolates in ducks and geese. Food Control. 50: 328-330. [ Links ]

Lee, M.D., and Newell, D.G. 2006. Campylobacter in poultry: filling an ecolo- gical niche. Avian Dis. 50, 1-9. [ Links ]

Mäesaar, M., Kramarenko, T., Meremäe, K., Sõgel, J., Lillenberg, M., Häkkinen, L., Ivanona, M., Kovalenko, K., Hörman, A., Hänninen, M.L. and Roasto, M. 2016. Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Campylobacter spp. Isolated from Broiler Chicken Meat of Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian Origin at Estonian Retail Level and from Patients with Severe Enteric Infections in Estonia. Zoonoses Public Health. 63: 89-96. [ Links ]

McDermott, P., Bodies, S., English, L., White, D., Walker, R., Zhao, S., Simjee, S., and Wagner, D. 2002. Ciprofloxacin resistance in Campylobacter jejuni evolves rapidly in chickens treated with fluoroquinolones. J INFECT DIS. 185: 837-840. [ Links ]

Orrego, M., Weiler, N., Portillo, R., Lird, G., Acosta, L., Ortiz, F., Mereles, E., Rodríguez, G., Menacho, C., Fernandez, P., Melgarejo, N., Zarate, N., Huber, C., and Alvarez, M. Sindrome diarreico agudo causado por Campylobacter spp. en pacientes menores de 11 años y su resistencia antimicrobiana a las drogas de elección para tratamiento 2010-2012, Paraguay. Sindrome diarreico agudo causado por Campylobacter spp. en pacientes menores de 11 años y su resistencia antimicrobiana a las drogas de elección para tratamiento 2010-2012, Paraguay. Pediatr. 41 (2): 127-130. [ Links ]

Payot, S., Bolla, J-M., Corcoran, D., Fanning, S., Mégraud, F. and Zhang, Q. 2006. Mechanisms of fluoroquinolone and macrolide resistance in Campylobacter spp. Microbes Infect. 8: 1967-1971. [ Links ]

Prachantasena, S., Charununtakorn, P., Muangnoicharoen, S., Hankla, L., Techawal, N., Chaveerach, P., Tuitemwong, P., Chokesajjawatee, N., Williams, N., Humphrey, T., and Luangtongkum, T. 2016. Distribution and Genetic Profiles of Campylobacter in Commercial Broiler Production from Breeder to Slaughter in Thailand. PloS One. 11: e0149585. [ Links ]

Quetz JS, Lima IFN, Havt A, Prata MMG, Cavalcante PA, Medeiros PHQS, et al. Campylobacter jejuni infection and virulence-associated genes in children with moderate to severe diarrhoea admitted to emergency rooms in northeastern Brazil. J Med Microbiol 2012; 61: 507-513. [ Links ]

Rojas, D., Simón, C., Feltes, P., Acosta, F., Gónzalez, E. and Alárcon, G. Informe sobre la georeferenciamiento de granjas avícolas de tipo comercial. SENACSA, San Lorenzo, 2010, 30 pp. [ Links ]

Robyn, J., Rasschaert, G., Pasmans, F. and Heyndrickx, M. 2015. Thermotolerant Campylobacter during Broiler Rearing: Risk Factors and Intervention: Campylobacter during broiler rearing: Risk factors and intervention. Compr Rev in Food Sci and Food Saf. 14: 81-105. [ Links ]

R Core Team. 2016. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [ Links ]

Rivera, N., Bustos, R., Montenegro, S., Sandoval, M., Castillo, J., Fernández, H., Maturana, M., Delgado, L., Contrera, A., Chavez, D. and Quevedo, I. 2002. Genotipificación y resistencia antibacteriana de cepas de Campylobacter spp aisladas en niños y en aves de corral. Rev Chilena Infectol. 28: 555-562. [ Links ]

Saleha, A.A. 2002. Isolation and characterization of Campylobacter jejuni from broiler chickens in Malaysia. Int J Poult Sci. 1: 94-97. [ Links ]

Sahin, O., Morishita, T.Y., and Zhang, Q. 2002. Campylobacter colonization in poultry: sources of infection and modes of transmission. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 3, 95-105. [ Links ]

Saiyudthong, S., Phusri, K. and Buates, S. 2015. Rapid detection of Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari in fresh chicken meat and by-products in Bangkok, Thailand, Using Modified Multiplex PCR. J Food Prot. 78: 1363-1369. [ Links ]

Seliwiorstow, T., De Zutter, L., Houf, K., Botteldoorn, N., Baré, J. and Van Damme, I. 2016. Comparative performance of isolation methods using Preston broth, Bolton broth and their modifications for the detection of Campylobacter spp. from naturally contaminated fresh and frozen raw poultry meat. Int J Food Microbiol. 234: 60-64. [ Links ]

Silva, D.T., Tejada, T.S., Blum-Menezes, D., Dias, P.A. and Timm, C.D. 2016. Campylobacter species isolated from poultry and humans, and their analysis using PFGE in southern Brazil. Int J of Food Microbiol. 217: 189-194. [ Links ]

Tamborini, A.L., Casabona, L.M., Viñas, M.R., Asato, V., Hoffer, A., Farace, M.I., Lucero, M., Corso, A. and Pichel, M. 2012. Campylobacter spp.: prevalencia y caracterización feno-genotípica de aislamientos de pacientes con diarrea y de sus mascotas en la provincia de La Pampa, Argentina. Rev Argent Microb. 44: 266:271. [ Links ]

Thakur, S., Zhao, S., Mc Dermott. P.F., Harbottle, H., Abbott, J., English, L., Gebreyes, W. and White, D. 2010. Antimicrobial resistance, virulence, and genotypic profile comparison of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from humans and retail meats. Foodborne Pathog and Dis. 7: 835-844. [ Links ]

Vandamme, P., Van Doorn, L.J., Al Rashid, S.T., Quint, W.G., van der Plas, J., Chan, V. and On, S. 1997. Campylobacter hyoilei Alderton et al. 1995 and Campylobacter coli Wron and Chatelain 1973 are subjective synonyms. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 47: 1055-1060 [ Links ]

USAI. 2010. United States Agency International Development. Producción Avícola: Negocio en Crecimiento. USAID, Asunción, Paraguay. https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1862/produccion_avicola.pdfLinks ]

Wang, Y., Dong, Y., Deng, F., Liu, D., Yao, H., Zhang, Q. , Shen, J . Zhihai, L., Yanan, G., Congming, W. and Zhangqi, S. 2016. Species shift and multidrug resistance of Campylobacter from chicken and swine, China, 2008-14. J Antimicrob Chemother. 71: 666-669. [ Links ]

Wieczorek, K., Denis, E. and Osek, J. 2015. Comparative analysis of antimicrobial resistance and genetic diversity of Campylobacter from broilers slaughtered in Poland. Int J Food Microbiol. 210: 24-32. [ Links ]

Wieczorek, K.; Bocian, Ł.; Osek, J. 2020. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter isolated from carcasses of chickens slaughtered in Poland - a retrospective study. Food Control. 112. [ Links ]

WHO. 2007. Who Global Salm Surv. Manual de Procedimientos para el aislamiento y caracterización de Campylobacter spp. http://bvs.panalimentos.org/local/file/Manual_Campylobacter_31-08-2007.pdfLinks ]

Yew Huat, J.T., Abdul Aziz, S., Abu, J., Mohamad, Gh. F., Tuan Chile, T.Z., Ahmad, N., Afriani, S., Mitsuaki, N., Son, R. 2010. Thermophilic Campylobacter spp. Occurrence on Chickens at Farm, Slaughter House and Retail. Int J Poult Sci. 9: 134-138. [ Links ]

Zhao, S. , Young, S.R., Tong. E., Abbott, J. W., Womack, N. and Friedman, S.L. and Mc Dermott, P. 2010. Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter Isolates from Retail Meat in the United States between 2002 and 2007. Appl and Environ Microbiol. 76: 7949-7956. [ Links ]

Zendehbad, B., Khayatzadeh, J. and Alipour, A. 2015. Prevalence, seasonality and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. isolates of retail broiler meat in Iran. Food Control. 53: 41-45. [ Links ]

Received: April 24, 2022; Accepted: August 28, 2023; Published: October 13, 2023

*Author for correspondence: Liz Aurora Castro Rojas e-mail: lcastro@vet.una.py

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License