SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.9 número1What is "constitutional efficacy"?: conceptual obstacles for research on the effects of constitutionsA snapshot of the mexican clean energy obligations system índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Mexican law review

versión On-line ISSN 2448-5306versión impresa ISSN 1870-0578

Resumen

JASA SILVEIRA, Graciela. Challenging the centralist doctrine in mexican family law: an analysis of the evolution of state authority over civil law matters and its impact on the regulation of cohabitation and divorce. Mex. law rev [online]. 2016, vol.9, n.1, pp.45-79. ISSN 2448-5306.

This article addresses the need for debate about the concepts of federalism, centralization, decentralization and sovereignty within the context of Mexican comparative and family law. Until recently, private law and family law scholars have generally dismissed the issue of federalism within Mexico, largely because of the belief that Mexico is not "really" federalist given its strong tendency toward political and legal centralism. Despite this preconception -and the fact that Mexico does have a highly centralized federal system- a deeper analysis shows that states and sub-national jurisdictions have played a critical role in shaping the contours of family law and influencing the state-federal relationship. This article argues that the centralist doctrine that so permeates scholarly works on private law in Mexico -if not addressed and revised both for the past and present- risks undermining attempts at understanding legal change and improving Mexican family law.

Palabras llave : Federalism; decentralization; private law sovereignty; comparative law; family law.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés