SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.10 número especial 23Propiedades fisicoquímicas de frutos silvestres de Rubus con potencial nutracéutico y alimenticioNutrición mineral con nitrógeno, fósforo y potasio en la producción del barril azul en invernadero índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

versión impresa ISSN 2007-0934

Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc vol.10 spe 23 Texcoco sep./nov. 2019  Epub 20-Nov-2020

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v0i23.2029 

Articles

Selection of outstanding papaya plants in commercial environments for breeding purposes

Juan Carlos Álvarez Hernández1  § 

Luis Mario Tapia-Vargas2 

1Campo Experimental Valle de Apatzingán-INIFAP. Carretera Apatzingán-Cuatro Caminos km 17.5, Antúnez, Parácuaro, Michoacán, México. CP. 60781.

2Campo Experimental Uruapan-INIFAP. Av. Latinoamericana 1101, Col. Revolución, Uruapan, Michoacán, México. CP. 60150. (tapia.luismario@inifap.gob.mx).


Abstract

Due to market demand, in the producing regions of Mexico the dominant variety is Maradol, in different fruit quality levels, since the type of seed used varies from the original F1, to descendent selections identified as F2 to F5. The above, leads to a genotypic degeneration and segregation. In this way it is necessary an adequate selection of parents and controlled pollination for seed production, and that is adapted to the region of interest. Therefore, the objective was to select outstanding papaya plants adapted to the production area of Michoacán. Through field explorations in commercial plots, papaya plants of the Maradol hermaphrodite type and with outstanding characteristics were identified and characterized. In the plants, flower buds were selected and covered to induce self-pollination. The fruits were collected in the maturity stage and the seeds were obtained. Morphological variables of plant and fruit, health and germination were recorded. 12 orchards presented outstanding plants. The characterization of the progress in the development of floral bud to fruits was variable, since the amount of fruits formed in relation to the buds covered initially was reduced, as well as, it reduced the amount of fruits collected in relation to the fruits formed. Regarding phytosanitary status, the presence of viruses, mites and other insects was recorded in most of the registered orchards. The germination was acceptable. It was concluded that selected papaya plants were identified and characterized based on outstanding characteristics and adapted to the production area of Michoacán, for further improvement study.

Keywords: Carica papaya L.; hermaphrodite; Maradol variety; plant sexing; seed production

Resumen

Por la demanda del mercado, en las regiones productoras de México la variedad dominante es la Maradol, en diferentes niveles de calidad de fruta, ya que el tipo de semilla que se utiliza varía desde las originales F1, hasta selecciones descendientes identificadas como F2 a F5. Lo anterior, conlleva a una degeneración y segregación genotípica. De esta manera es necesaria una adecuada selección de progenitores y polinización controlada para la producción de semilla, y que este adaptada a la región de interés. Por ello, el objetivo fue seleccionar plantas de papaya sobresalientes y adaptadas a la zona productora de Michoacán. Mediante exploraciones de campo en parcelas comerciales, se identificaron y caracterizaron plantas de papaya del tipo Maradol hermafroditas y con características sobresalientes. En las plantas se seleccionaron botones florales y fueron cubiertos para provocar la autopolinización. Los frutos se colectaron en etapa de madurez y se obtuvieron las semillas. Se registraron variables morfológicas de planta y frutos, sanidad y germinación. 12 huertas presentaron plantas sobresalientes. La caracterización del progreso en el desarrollo de botón floral a frutos fue variable, pues se redujo la cantidad de frutos formados con relación a los botones cubiertos inicialmente, así como también, redujo la cantidad de frutos colectados en relación con los frutos formados. En cuanto al estado fitosanitario, se registró la presencia de virus, ácaros y otros insectos en la mayoría de las huertas registradas. La germinación fue aceptable. Se concluyó que se identificaron y caracterizaron plantas de papaya seleccionadas con base a características sobresalientes y adaptadas a la zona productora de Michoacán, para posterior estudio de mejoramiento.

Palabras clave: Carica papaya L.; hermafrodita; producción de semilla; sexado de planta; variedad Maradol

Introduction

Mexico is located in a privileged geographical position, which is favored by environmental conditions for the development of different crops in the open field. Among the economically important crops papaya (Carica papaya L.), whose annual per capita consumption is 6.4 kg (SIAP, 2017). It is a fruit species of rapid growth and high physiological activity, is widespread in the tropical and subtropical regions of the country. According to the SIAP-SADER (2019), nationally from 2010 to 2018 the cultivated area, the total production and the yield per hectare have presented growing trends in the cultivation of papaya, from 16 261 to 17 807 ha (9.5%), 648 235 to 1 034 532 t (59.6%) and 46.49 to 58.09 t ha-1 (24.9%), respectively.

Also, in order of participation, the states with the largest area harvested in 2018 were Veracruz, Colima, Oaxaca, Michoacán Chiapas and Guerrero, which together totaled 15 096 ha, however, Oaxaca excels in yields with 106.7 t ha-1 and in Veracruz was last placed with 32.9 t ha-1. Regarding the statistical record in Michoacán, it has not been stable, in the last 9 years the average cultivated area was 2 421 ±589 ha, the total yield was 55 703 ±16 247 t and the yield was 32 ±2.2 t ha-1 (SIAP-SADER, 2019).

Due to market demand, in the producing regions of Mexico the dominant variety is the Maradol of Cuban origin (SIAP-2017), in its different levels of fruit quality, since the type of seed used varies from the original F1 to descendent selections identified as F2 to F5. The above, leads to a genotypic degeneration and segregation. This situation is attributable to the type of pollination characteristic of papaya and influenced by its floral biology (Urasaki et al., 2012).

The papaya is a very complex species from the physiological point of view, and this complexity is reflected in the production of fruits, so it is important to understand the different floral aspects (Álvarez et al., 2018), as well as the selection of the progenitors and controlled pollination, as well as in obtaining seed, crosses must be made between hermaphroditic plants or self-pollination to obtain 66% of seeds that will originate hermaphroditic plants (Ram, 2005).

In the selection of plants for seed multiplication purposes must meet the requirements to ensure their origin and quality based on the following characteristics: be vigorous, phenotype must correspond to the desired variety, free of pests and diseases or varieties that show tolerance, minimum production of carpella fruits in hermaphrodite plants during winter, fruits of female or hermaphrodite, present characteristics that allow to determine what is an optimal production, locate at low height, must obtain a minimum production of sterile female flowers at the end of summer and early autumn or during dry periods, be uniform, both the size and shape of the fruit (SNICS-SAGARPA, 2014).

Therefore, it is necessary to rescue genetic material that can be used in the improvement of papaya for seed production, but also adapted to the region of interest (SNITT-SAGARPA, 2016). The agro-food chain of papaya faces difficulties associated with the low capacity for innovation and development, dependence on the production of seeds from the foreign market and, in addition, almost the entire production depends only on the Maradol variety.

Framed in the philosophy of intensive horticulture, the strategy is based on achieving higher yields per cultivated area in order to increase levels of productivity and competitiveness (Kleiber et al., 2012). Based on the foregoing, the objective was to select genotypes of papaya in commercial orchards with outstanding characteristics and adapted to the production area of Michoacán.

Materials and methods

Through field explorations in commercial plots of the Valley of Apatzingán, Michoacán during the months of March to December 2018, papaya plants of the Maradol type were identified. The characteristics were based on identifying plants with healthy visual appearance and excellent vigor, hermaphroditic sex, height at the first flower below 0.8 m and precocity in fruit production.

In each selected plant, at least four flower buds were chosen next to the floral opening, in order to ensure that there is no contamination or cross-pollination, these were covered with a waxed paper bag and labeled. The process of development of the fruits until physiological maturity took approximately 5 months and were collected for seed extraction and conditioning; through, wash for next germination study. Germination was based on soaking the seed in water for three days, and the floating seed, considered as vain seeds, was eliminated.

The rescued seed was placed in moist flannels and kept at room temperature (27 ±3 ºC). In addition, the level of health of the plants was contemplated, by visual exploration the presence/absence of pest insects was recorded under randomized sampling in the plants adjacent to the outstanding plants, this to anticipate some degree of tolerance or resistance.

The registered variables were: characterization of the sites using equipment and specialized literature, percentage of fruits formed and fruits collected on the flower buds covered initially; presence and absence of viruses and major pests of papaya, height of plant, the first fruit and stem circumference and fruits per plant in the harvest stage. Fruits collected were recorded polar and equatorial circumference, fruit weight, pulp width, soluble solids with refractometer and firmness with manual penetrometer and yield estimation per plant.

In relation to the germination, knowing the initial number of seed and by difference the vain seed was registered and later the germinated seed. The data recorded were analyzed with descriptive statistics, while the germination test was percentage.

Results and discussion

28 commercial orchards were explored in four municipalities of the Valley of Apatzingán Michoacán, in some orchards no outstanding plants were identified, because regardless of the surface, this did not guarantee their presence, so only 12 orchards presented this type of plants in localities corresponded to the municipalities of Paracuaro and Tepalcatepec. The location and altitude followed a common pattern in turn, the surfaces and genotypes of the orchards were variable, as well as the record of plants, buds and fruits (Table 1).

Table 1 Characterization of commercial papaya orchards and condition of selected plants. 

Id. Municipality Location Latitude north Longitude west Altitude (m) Area (ha) Genotype Selected plants (num.) Protected buds (num.) Fruits formed (num.) Quality fruits (num.)
HP3 Parácuaro Antúnez ‘La pista’ 19°00’15’’ 102°13’00’’ 376 10 Maradol 3 10 1 1
HP4 Parácuaro Antúnez ‘La perla 1’ 19°00’15’’ 102°13’00’’ 305 7 Maradol 3 12 5 2
HP5 Parácuaro Antúnez ‘La perla 2’ 18°57’08’’ 102°13’40’’ 310 8 Maradol 4 12 7 2
HP6 Parácuaro Antúnez ‘La perla 3’ 18°56’17’’ 102°14’01’’ 315 13 Maradol 4 12 9 2
HP7 Parácuaro Antúnez ‘Y griega’ 18°56’12’’ 102°14´05’’ 308 10 Maradol 3 10 6 2
HP8 Parácuaro Antúnez ‘La soledad’ 18°58’34’’ 102°12’22’’ 322 10 Maradol 3 9 5 2
HP10 Parácuaro Antúnez ‘Piedra Parada’ 18°57’52’’ 102°15’20’’ 334 13 Maradol 3 9 4 1
HP11 Parácuaro Antúnez ‘Pando’ 19°02’00’’ 102°12’35’’ 381 4 Maradol 3 10 6 1
HP13 Parácuaro Los Pozos 18°56’01’’ 102°13’05’’ 300 7 Maradol 3 7 4 1
HP14 Parácuaro 1o. de septiembre 18°51’51’’ 102°11’04’’ 300 6 Maradol 3 9 4 1
HT2 Tepalcatepec Taixtan 19°07’58’’ 102°50’42’’ 354 6 Maradol 2 8 3 1
HT7 Tepalcatepec Milanés 19°08’57’’ 102°51’38’’ 366 8 Guajira 2 6 4 1

Similarly, Table 2 presents the percentage values reached of the fruits formed and the fruits collected; that is, the fruits of quality. As it is appreciated, during the development it reduced the amount of fruits formed in relation to the covered buds, as well as, reduced the amount of fruits collected in relation to the fruits formed, due to factors of nature that influenced the process, with this, the fruits with quality except for the HP3 orchard, the rest of the orchards, presented percentages less than 50% of fruits collected.

Table 2 Process cycle floral buds to collected fruits and phytosanitary and morphological characterization of outstanding papaya plants. 

Id. (%) of formed fruits/covered buds (%) of fruits collected/fruits formed Presence (+) / absence (-) Plant height (cm) Stem circumference (cm) Height at first fruit (cm) Fruits per plant (no.)
Virus Mites Chicharrite Other insects
HP3 10 100 + + - + 190 31 47 34
HP4 41.7 40 + + - + 187 36 45 30
HP5 58.3 28.6 + - - - 166 34 52 27
HP6 75 22.2 - + - - 159 33 44 32
HP7 60 33.3 + + - + 187 29 37 30
HP8 55.6 40 - - - + 170 30 56 33
HP10 44.4 25 - + - + 195 29 40 40
HP11 60 16.7 - + - - 200 35 43 28
HP13 57.1 25 + - - + 171 36 60 29
HP14 44.4 25 - - - + 222 33 55 33
HT2 37.5 33.3 + + - + 182 34 45 38
HT7 66.7 25 - + - - 169 30 55 37

In the same Table 2, we can also see the phytosanitary status record (presence/absence) of three main phytosanitary problems in the region, and concentration of other less persistent pests (whitefly, aphids), in this respect, leafhopper was not detected in the orchards, at least in the sampling period. Regarding height of the plant and stem circumference, they showed characteristic values of the Maradol type, the height to the first fruit and the number of fruits per plant are acceptable for their integration of these materials in an improvement process (Table 2).

It is important to note that the papaya industry faces two main problems, diseases and sex differentiation in seedling stage (Karambu et al., 2018). It should be noted that Carica papaya is propagated by seeds, with this heterogeneity of the plants (Bhattacharya and Khuspe, 2001). In addition, in Mexico the main variety of cultivated papaya is Maradol (Santamaría et al., 2009). So the selection of plants is the first work of great importance, it means a good start to improve the crop.

The initial process is based on locating a plantation or uniform plants, good yield, health, vigor and growth characteristics such as uniformity in size and shape of fruits, uniformity of production, beginning of flowering of low height and predominance of sex hermaphrodite, in addition, the plants should not have deformed fruits. All these characteristics must be suitable, since they are inheritable (Díaz, 2002). Therefore, in the present study the methodology used pursues the fundamental principles to have an appropriate genetic base to choose promising materials.

Regarding the characterization of the fruits, the results are presented in Table 3, the weight of the fruit was tolerable, oscillating between 0.9 to 1.36 kg and this in turn was reflected in the size of fruit and width of pulp whose tendency was similar. The values of soluble solids and pulp hardness reveal adequate sweetness and firmness, respectively. The yields per plant were variable; however, with the minimum registered yield of the HP13 orchard, at a traditional reserved density of 2 000 plants ha-1, it is possible to exceed 50 t ha-1 (Table 3).

Table 3 Characterization of collected fruits and estimated yield of outstanding papaya plants. 

Id. Circumference of fruit Weight of fruit (kg) Pulp width (cm) Soluble solids (ºBrix) Pulp firmness (kg cm-2) Estimated yield/plant(kg)
Polar (cm) Equatorial (cm)
HP3 58 44 1.146 2.7 12 2.1 38.96
HP4 60 39 1.125 3 14 2 33.75
HP5 51 46 1.23 2.8 13 2.1 33.21
HP6 59 41 1.36 2.7 11 1.9 43.52
HP7 49 38 0.975 2.2 15 2.2 29.25
HP8 50 32 1.111 2.5 12 2.1 36.66
HP10 46 36 1.001 2.3 13 1.9 40.04
HP11 47 38 1.15 2.4 11 2 32.2
HP13 44 37 0.98 2.2 15 2.1 28.42
HP14 50 39 1.125 2.4 13 2.2 37.12
HT2 49 38 0.9 2.5 12 1.9 32.2
HT7 54 40 1.07 2.1 11 2.2 39.59

On the other hand, the calculated statistical values of the registered variables are shown in Table 4.

Table 4 Statistical parameters of the variables registered in outstanding papaya plants. 

Statistical AP(cm) CT(cm) APF(cm) FP(núm.) CPF(cm) CEF(cm) PF(kg) AP(cm) SS(ºBrix) FP(kg cm-2) REP(kg)
Mean 183.16 32.5 48.25 32.58 51.41 39 1.09 2.48 12.66 2.05 35.41
Standard deviation 17.6 2.61 7.17 4.1 5.23 3.61 0.12 0.27 1.43 0.11 4.63
Standard error 5.08 0.75 2.07 1.18 1.5 1.04 0.03 0.07 0.41 0.03 1.33
Minimum 159 29 37 27 44 32 0.9 2.1 11 1.9 28.42
Maximum 222 36 60 40 60 46 1.36 3 15 2.2 43.52
CV (%) 9.61 8.03 14.86 12.58 10.17 9.27 11.36 10.97 11.33 5.65 13.1
Variance 309.96 6.81 51.47 16.81 27.35 13.09 0.01 0.07 2.06 0.01 21.52
95% confidence interval 9.96 1.47 4.05 2.31 2.95 2.04 0.07 0.15 0.81 0.06 2.62
99% confidence interval 13.11 1.94 5.34 3.05 3.89 2.69 0.09 0.2 1.06 0.08 3.45

AP= plant height; CT= stem circumference; APF= height at first fruit; FP= fruits per plant; CPF= polar circumference of fruit; CEF= equatorial circumference of fruit; PF= fruit weight; AP= pulp width; SS= soluble solids; FP= pulp firmness and REP= estimated yield per plant.

Both the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of flowers, leaves, seeds, plants and mainly fruits, are important parameters to evaluate in the selection of materials (Oliveira de et al., 2012). Particularly, °Brix higher than 12, red pulp color, fruit size and adequate fruit shape and non-deformed elongate, are minimum fruit quality requirements for obtaining seed (Stice et al., 2016). Also, the color of the peel is the most used characteristic to evaluate the state of maturation of the fruits of papaya (Santamaría et al., 2009) and this supports a visual criterion in the election of the fruits.

Regarding the behavior of the germination, in the period of soaking there was a low percentage of seedless, even in some orchards there was no. As for the general germination, it was higher than 80% (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Vain seed and germination achieved in outstanding papaya plants.  

While the germination response period was between 9 and 14 days; however, the highest germination was recorded at 12 days (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Variation of germination over time in outstanding papaya plants.  

As already indicated, the agronomic characteristics of tolerance or resistance to diseases are the main desirable aspects of breeding programs, based on an extended genetic base in order to satisfy the market (Silva et al., 2007) and in that identification, the analysis of growth allows to differentiate characteristics of initial growth that make possible the increase of the yield in adult stage and favor the works of improvement in search of more productive genotypes, with this, it is possible to explain differences in the growth of genetic origin or due to environmental modifications (Rodríguez et al., 2015).

Given that the genetic variability in commercial populations, allows to consider the exploitation of the papaya crop taken as a basis for the development of improved cultivars. In this subject, few reports exist on commercial populations (Pares et al., 2002; Aikpokpodion, 2012). The papaya is based on a narrow genetic base and few varieties and/or commercial hybrids for sowing are available and that do not meet the demands of national and international markets (Filho et al., 2007), since the price of the seed of imported hybrid papaya is high, this encourages producers to select generations F2 to F4 in continuous plantations, even when there is a risk of loss of vigor and segregation in the shape of the fruit (Marin et al., 2006).

So the collection of seeds, derived from the protection of flower buds, is a common practice (Stice et al., 2016), unlike the hybrids that are generated by two consanguineous parents and their development is slow, so that this process is complicated by the elimination of male parts of the flower (Chan, 2014). Therefore, exploratory studies in commercial environments are important to identify promising materials for the implementation of a multiplication and distribution strategy.

Conclusions

In 12 orchards, selected papaya plants were identified based on outstanding characteristics and adapted to the production area of Michoacán. The quality fruits collected varied among selected plants, since during the process from the selection of flower buds to the formation of fruits there is a loss by natural condition of more than 50%. Of the four phytosanitary problems of economic importance in the region, the leafhopper was not registered in the orchards registered.

The registered values of the morphological and fruit variables correspond to the characteristics of the Maradol variety. The germination of the seed was higher than 80% and occurred in greater proportion at 12 days.

Acknowledgments

To the National Institute of Forestry, Agriculture and Livestock Research, for the financing granted derived from the Call for Tax Funds 2018, SIGI project number: 14123334388.

REFERENCES

Aikpokpodion, P. O. 2012. Assessment of genetic diversity in horticultural and morphological traits among papaya (Carica papaya) accessions in Nigeria. Fruits. 67(3):173-187. [ Links ]

Álvarez, H. J. C.; Castellanos, R. J. Z. y Aguirre, M. C. L. 2018. Relación entre el sexo de plantas y el enrocetado peciolar en genotipos de papaya. Compendio Investigativo de Academia Journals. Elibro Online. 171-176 pp. [ Links ]

Bhattacharya, J. and Khuspe, S. S. 2001. In vitro and in vivo germination of papaya (Carica papaya L.) seed. Scientia Hort. 91(1-2):39-49. [ Links ]

Chan, Y. K. 2014. Successful production of hybrid papaya in Malaysia. In: Chomchalow, M. (Eds.). Proc. Third International Simposium on Papaya. Acta Hort. ISHS. 17-21 p. [ Links ]

Díaz, J. J. A. 2002. Manual práctico para el cultivo de la papaya hawaiana. 1a. Edición. Ed. Earth. Costa Rica. 108 p. [ Links ]

Filho, da S., F.; Gonzaga, P. M.; Cancela, R. C. C.; Correa, D. P.; Santana, P. N. and Ide, C. D. 2007. Genotypic correlations of morpho-agronomic traits in papaya and implications for genetic breeding. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 7(4)345-352. [ Links ]

Karambu, R. F.; Kwya, O. F.; Nzilani, M. N. and Miinda, A. E. 2018. Genetic improvement of papaya (Carica papaya L.). In: Al-Khayri, J. M. (Eds.). Advances in plant breeding strategies: fruits. Srpinger International Publishing. 897-928 p. [ Links ]

Kleiber, T.; Markiewicz, B.; Niewiadomska, A. 2012. Organic substrates for intensive horticultural cultures: yield and nutrient status of plants, microbiological parameters of substrates. Polish J. Environ. Studies. 5(21):1261-1271. [ Links ]

Marin, S. L. D.; Pereira, M. G.; Amaral, A. T.; Martelleto, L. A. P. and Ide, C. D. 2006. Heterosis in papaya hybrids from partial diallel of ‘Solo’ and ‘Formosa’ parents. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 6(1):24-29. [ Links ]

Oliveira de, E. J.; Pereira, D. N. L.; Loyola, D. J. L. 2012. Selection of morpho-agronomic descriptor for characterization of papaya cultivars. Euphytica. 185(2):253-265. [ Links ]

Ram, M. 2005. Papaya. Indian council of agricultural research, New Delhi. 1st. (Ed.). India. 189 p. [ Links ]

Rodríguez, C. J.; Yusnier Díaz, H. Y.; Aymara Pérez, G. A.; Fundora, L. R. y Rodríguez, H. P. 2015. Análisis del crecimiento de un genotipo silvestre de Carica papaya L. cultivado ex situ y cv. Maradol roja. Cultivos Tropicales. 36(3):96-105. [ Links ]

Santamaría, B. F.; Díaz, P. R.; Sauri, D. E.; Espadas, G. E.; Santamaría, F. J. M. y Larqué, S. A. 2009. Características de calidad de frutos de papaya Maradol en la madurez de consumo. Agric. Téc. Méx. 35(3):347-353. [ Links ]

SIAP. 2017. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. Atlas Agroalimentario. 1a. Edición. Ciudad de México. 231 p. [ Links ]

SIAP-SADER. 2019. Estadísticas de la producción nacional de papaya. http://infosiap.siap.gob.mx:8080/agricola-siap-gobmx/AvanceNacionalSinPrograma.do. [ Links ]

Silva, F. F.; Pereira, M. G.; Damasceno, P. C.; Pereira, T, N, S.; Viana, A. P.; Daher, R. F.; Ramos, H. C. C. and Ferrequett, G. A. 2007. Evaluation of sexual expression in a segregating C. papaya population. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotech. 7(1):16-23. [ Links ]

SNICS-SAGARPA. 2014. Regla para la calificación de semilla de papaya (Carica papaya L.). 23 p. [ Links ]

SNITT-SAGARPA. 2016. Agenda nacional de investigación, innovación y transferencia de tecnología agrícola 2016-2022. 1a. (Ed.). México. 197 p. [ Links ]

Stice, K. N.; Tora, L.; Iranacolaivalu, M. and Wagainabete, T. 2016. Developing local seed production systems for Fiji Red papaya. In: Drew, R. (Eds.). XXIX IHC - Proc. Int. Symp. on Papaya, Pineaple and Mango. ISHS. 95-98 p. [ Links ]

Urasaki, N. K.; Tarora, A.; Shudo, H.; Ueno, M.; Tamaki, N.; Miyagi, S.; Adaniya, S. and Matsumura H. 2012. Digital transcriptome analysis of putative sex determination genes in papaya (Carica papaya). PLoS ONE. 7(7):1-9. [ Links ]

Received: July 01, 2019; Accepted: September 01, 2019

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons