SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.7 número36Biomasa arbustiva, herbácea y en el piso forestal como factor de riesgo de incendiosDistribución potencial de Lophodermium spp. en bosques de coníferas, con escenarios de cambio climático índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de ciencias forestales

versión impresa ISSN 2007-1132

Rev. mex. de cienc. forestales vol.7 no.36 México jul./ago. 2016

 

Articles

Plant quality of Cedrela odorata L. associated with nursery cultural practicesa b

Erickson Basave Villalobos1  * 

Lucía Concepción García Castillo2 

Aurelio Castro Ríos2 

Celi Gloria Calixto Valencia3 

José Ángel Sigala Rodríguez1 

José Luis García Pérez4 

1Campo Experimental Valle del Guadiana. CIR Norte Centro. INIFAP. México.

2 División de Ingeniería Forestal. Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Venustiano Carranza. México.

3 Profesional independiente.

4 Sitio Experimental La Campana. CIR Norte Centro. INIFAP. México


Abstract:

In Mexico, many reforestations with Cedrela odorata have not had an initial favorable performance, mainly due to the use of low quality plants, so alternatives are required in forest nurseries to improve such condition. In this work the influence of container volume and hydrogel on the morphology, nutritional status and field performance of the seedlings of this species was examined. The volume of the container was managed at two levels: 500 mL polyethylene bag and 380 mL plastic cartridge; hydrogel, with three levels: addition of 0, 2 and 4 g L-1 of substrate. The characteristics of the seedlings were assessed at the nursery by determining several morphological indicators of plant quality and the use of nomograms of vector analysis for the diagnosis of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. Field performance was measured as survival and growth for 17 months, since the establishment of the plantation. The seedlings with the best attributes were produced in containers of 500 mL with the addition of hydrogel to the substrate in doses of 4 gL-1; however, the best performance in the field corresponded to those produced in containers of 500 mL without hydrogel, which allows to conclude that the container volume has a direct effect on the quality of C. odorata plant.

Key words: Red cedar; Cedrela odorata L.; forest plant production; reforestation; tropic; forest nursery

Resumen:

En México muchas reforestaciones con Cedrela odorata no han tenido un desempeño inicial favorable, principalmente por el uso de planta de baja calidad, por lo que se requieren de alternativas en los viveros forestales que mejoren dicha condición. En el presente trabajo fue examinada la influencia del volumen de envase e hidrogel sobre la morfología, estado nutrimental y desempeño en campo de plántulas de C. odorata. El volumen del envase se manejó a dos niveles: bolsa de polietileno de 500 mL y tubete de plástico de 380 mL; el hidrogel, con tres niveles: adición de 0, 2 y 4 g L-1 de sustrato. Las características de las plántulas se evaluaron en vivero, mediante la determinación de varios indicadores morfológicos de calidad de planta y el uso de nomogramas de análisis de vectores para el diagnóstico del estado del nitrógeno, fósforo y potasio. El desempeño en campo fue medido como supervivencia y crecimiento durante 17 meses, a partir del establecimiento de la plantación. Las plántulas con los mejores atributos fueron las producidas en envases de 500 mL con la adición de hidrogel al sustrato en dosis de 4 g L-1; no obstante, el mejor desempeño en campo correspondió a las producidas en envases de 500 mL sin hidrogel, lo que permite concluir que el volumen de envase tiene un efecto directo en la calidad de planta de C. odorata.

Palabras clave: Cedro rojo; Cedrela odorata L.; producción de planta forestal; reforestación; trópico; vivero forestal

Introduction

Red cedar (Cedrela odorata L.) is one of the most valuable and widely distributed tropical timber species in Latin America and the Caribbean. Its importance as producer of precious wood, encompasses economic, ecological and social aspects (Mesén, 2006). Therefore, it is widely used in reforestation plantations in the Mexican tropics.

Most reforestations are oriented to projects of productive reconversion in abandoned land with a history of agricultural use (Ramírez et al., 2008). However, many of them have not had the expected success, due to the high mortality and the poor growth of the plants. These problems are associated with a number of factors, such as the vulnerability of the species to the attack of Hypsipyla grandella (Zeller, 1848) and severe soil degradation at plantation sites (Calixto et al., 2015). However, the impact of each factor has been greater due to the use of low quality plant, which does not meet the morphological and physiological characteristics appropriate to the conditions of the destination sites (Conafor, 2012).

At the nursery, the accomplishment of these characteristics is related to the implementation of diverse cultural practices (Rodríguez, 2008). The choice of one or more depends on their effectiveness in increasing plant quality of the species to be produced (Jacobs and Wilkinson, 2009).

In plants of different forest species produced in nursery, both tropical and temperate-cold, the volume of the container or the addition of hydrogel to the substrate have shown a predominant influence on the modification of some of its properties. In several of them, as the volume of the container is larger, its morphological aspects of quality are better, such as stem height and diameter, as well as the balance between aerial biomass formation and radical biomass (Ferraz and Engel, 2011, Lisboa et al., 2012, Abreu et al., 2014). In others, with the use of hydrogel not only a shape improvement has been recorded (Orikiriza et al., 2009; Maldonado et al., 2011), but also of physiological order, which refers to the nutritional status as one of the main attributes affected (Chirino et al., 2011; Bernardi et al., 2012), a benefit that depends on the dose applied. It is likely that in C. odorata the above factors have a similar effect, so it is important to study them in detail.

Based on the above, this work analyzes the influence of the volume of the container and the addition of hydrogel to the substrate on the morphology, nutritional status and field performance of C. odorata seedlings. The study poses three hypotheses: 1) the larger the container volume, the morphological attributes of C. odorata seedlings are better; 2) the addition of hydrogel to the substrate also favors the morphology and nutritional status of the seedlings; and 3) nursery seedlings with the most outstanding quality attributes (morphological and nutritional status) have high rates of survival and growth in the field.

Materials and Methods

Study area

The study comprised two experimental stages: nursery and field. Both were carried out at the Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Venustiano Carranza (Venustiano Carranza Higher Technological Institute), located at Villa Lázaro Cárdenas, Venustiano Carranza, Puebla, Mexico, between 20°28’28.39“ N and 97°41’53.60“ W geographic coordinates, at an altitude of 344 m. The climate of the area is warm humid with abundant rains in summer, average (Inegi, 2009).

The nursery stage was carried out inside a shade house covered by 70 % black mesh. During the assay, average maximum temperatures of 35 °C and minimum temperatures of 20 °C were recorded. The average daytime relative humidity oscillated around 85 %. The field stage was developed in a field, whose history of use is related to agricultural activities.

Production of seedlings in nursery

The seedling was produced from seeds harvested in May 2014 from 10 to 20 trees, selected for their outstanding phenotypic characteristics, in natural stands located in the municipality of Coyutla, Veracruz State (20°35’80“ N and 97°68’30” W). 1 000 seeds were soaked in running water for 12 h to standardize their germination; later they were planted on a substrate of washed and disinfected sand of river by means of solarization. Three weeks later, 384 seedlings of uniform height (approximately 5 cm) were transplanted into 500 mL polyethylene black bags and 380 mL plastic tube containers, into which which a substrate made up of decomposed organic matter of Alchornia latifolia Sw. and hydrogel (1-2 mm particle size) were put.

As complementary cultural practices in the production of the seedling, the plants were fertilized with the regime and program developed for Swietenia humilis Zuccarini by Basave et al. (2015), which consists of applying general purpose water- soluble fertilizer (20-20-20) at a base dose of 17-412 mg L-1 of N. In addition, periodic waterings were made in regard to the availability of moisture in the substratum. In total, nursery production lasted three months.

Treatments and experimental design in nursery

The assessed factors in the nursery were the container volume and the hydrogel dose. For the first factor, the 500 mL black polyethylene bag (B500) and the 380 mL black plastic tube (T380) were used. For the second factor, doses of 0, 2 and 4 g of hydrogel per L of substrate were used. The six treatments resulting from the 2 x 3 factorial arrangement were T1 (B500 + 0g hydrogel), T2 (B500 + 2 g hydrogel), T3 (B500 + 4 g hydrogel), T4 (T380 + 0 g hydrogel), T5 (T380 + 2 g of hydrogel) and T6 (T380 + 4 g of hydrogel) with four replications. The T4 treatment was the control because it represents the main production system of C. odorata at the nursery. The experimental unit was made up by 16 seedlings which were spatially distributed on a bed of growth, in rows of 8 x 3, under a completely random experimental design.

Evaluation of morphology and nutritional status in nursery

At the end of the nursery phase, seedlings were examined for their morphology and nutritional status. The assessment was done in a random sample of 16 seedlings per treatment (four per replication). Based on the methodology described by Johnson and Cline (1991), the first criterion was analyzed from plant quality morphological variables: stem height (A [cm]), stem diameter at the root neck (D [cm]), dry air weight (PSA [g]) and dry weight (PSR [g]). In addition, the PSA/PSR ratio (R: PSA/PSR), the robustness index (RI) and the Dickson quality index (ICD) were calculated. The nutritional status was measured based on the concentration and content of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K). The samples previously analyzed morphologically were sent to the laboratory for a chemical analysis of plant tissue, which was practiced to the whole plants. The concentration of N (%) was determined by the microkjeldahl method, the P by vanadate-yellow molybdate/ spectrophotometry and K by wet digestion / atomic absorption. The content (mg of nutrient / plant) was obtained with the values of total dry biomass (PSA + PSR) and the concentration of each nutrient (%).

Statistical analysis of nursery data

A bifactorial variance analysis was performed using the ANOVA procedure of SAS 9.2 version (2009). The assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were validated. The hypothesis test was based on a significance level of 0.05. The means were compared in pairs using the Tukey test (α = 0.05).

The nutritional status of the seedlings was diagnosed by the vector method. The latter procedure consisted of two stages: the construction of vector nomograms and their interpretation. The nomograms were constructed according to the methodology described by Haase and Rose (1995) with relative values and a control treatment as a reference point, which in this case correspond to those of T4. Their interpretation was based on the works developed by Haase and Rose (1995) and López and Alvarado (2010).

Establishment of field plantation

Due to the great amount of weeds in the field, prior to the establishment of the plantation, mechanical weeding was done through the technique rubble, grave and burning. Subsequently, during the third week of September 2014, a sample of 120 seedlings, selected at random from the treatments evaluated at the nursery, was established in the field. At the time of planting, soil moisture was between 30 and 40 %. The design of the plantation was in triangular spacing with a distance between trees of 3 m. The planting technique was of common strain. The strains were opened at 30 cm depth by 20 cm in diameter. After establishment of the plantation, bimonthly weeds were manually controlled only at the base of the tree within a circular perimeter of about 2 m.

Evaluated treatments and experimental design in the field

The assessed treatments consisted of the six treatments analyzed in nursery. Each one of them had four replicates. The experimental unit consisted of five plants. Randomized complete blocks was the experimental design used. The blocking criterion was the soil moisture variability described in the previous paragraph.

Variables evaluated in the field

The criteria for the performance of seedlings in the field were survival and growth (height and diameter). Data collection was taken each month for the first six months from the time of planting (September 2014 to February 2015); a final evaluation was made at 17 months from the establishment (January 2016). Survival was recorded as a binomial variable with values 0 for dead individuals and 1 for living individuals. Height growth (stem-to-apex measure) and diameter (measured at the base of the stem) were analyzed as absolute growth rate (TCA) using the following formula:

TCA=T2-T1T

Where:

T1 and T2 = Growth taken at the time of the first and the second assessment, respectively

ΔT = Interval (time in months) between the two measurements

Statistical analysis of field data

The analysis of survival was carried out through the Log-Rank test from the survival curves built with the Kaplan-Meier method, which defines the function as:

Where=

S (t) = Survival function

P = Death probability of a seedling

T = Undefined life span of a seedling longer than the time of the study

t = Defined life span of a seedling during the time of the study

The LIFETEST procedure of SAS 9.2 version (SAS, 2009) was followed.

During the second assessment period there was a high mortality rate that affected complete treatments; therefore, only the values of the absolute growth rates (height and diameter) of the first period were subjected to an analysis of variance by using the ANOVA procedure in SAS 9.2 version (SAS, 2009). Prior to this, the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variances were validated. The hypothesis test was based on a significance level of α = 0.05. The means were compared by pairs using the Tukey test (α = 0.05).

Results

In nursery, the influence of the container volume on the modification of seedling morphology was associated with the addition of hydrogel to the substrate (Table 1).

Table 1 Statistical significance for quality morphological indicators in Cedrela odorata L. seedlings produced in containers of different volumes and with different doses of hydrogel in the substrate. 

* P<0.05; ** P<0.001; *** P<0.0001; NS = Non significant; 1 = Height of the aerial part; 2 = Diameter of the root neck; 3 = Aerial dry weight; 4 = Root dry weight; 5 = Aerial/root dry weight ratio; 6 = Robustness index; 7 = Dickson quality index.

Although there were statistical similarities between T1 and T3 seedlings, those of T3 showed the best values in most quality morphological variables (except for R: PSA/PSR) (Table 2). In regard to the seedlings of the control treatment (T4), those of T3 showed a growth 19. 67 % higher in height and 24.23 % in diameter (Table 2). In addition, the T3 individuals formed 2.23 times more aerial biomass and 1.71 more radical biomass compared to the control treatment (Table 2). IR, in which low values indicate better quality, showed a 5 % difference between T3 and T4 seedlings (Table 2). Finally, in the case of ICD, where higher values are better, there were differences greater than 40 % among the mentioned treatments (Table 2).

Table 2 Average values of the quality morphology variables assessed in Cedrela odorata L. seedlings produced in containers of different volume and with different hydrogel doses in the susbstrate 

1 = Height of the aerial part (average values in cm ± 0.74 standard error); 2 = Diameter of the root neck (average values in mm ± 0.14 standard error); 3 = Aerial dry weight (average values in g ± 0.09 standard error); 4 = Root dry weight (average values in g ± 0.04 standard error); 5 = Aerial/root dry weight ratio (average values ± 0.20 standard error); 6 = Robustness index (average values ± 0.16 standard error); 7 = Dickson quality index (average values ± 0. 02 standard error). Means with different letter within the same column are statistically different (Tukey α = 0.05).

Nutritional condition

Regardless of the corresponding effect of the addition of hydrogel, the seedlings with the greatest amount of nutritional reserves were produced in the 500 mL containers (Table 3).

Table 3 Absolute and relative values of the nutritional condition of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium of Cedrela odorata L. plants at the end of the production period at the nursery. 

Also, according to the nomograms of vectors, and taking the nutritional status of the plants of T4 in nitrogen, those of T1 showed a dilution effect, those of T2 of luxury consumption, those of T3 of sufficiency and those of T5 and T6 of depletion (Figure 1A). A similar effect to that obtained in nitrogen was observed in phosphorus, although in this case the T2 no longer showed a luxury consumption but of dilution (Figure 1B). In regard to potassium, the plants of T1, T2, T3 and T6 had in common effects of luxury consumption; nevertheless, this response was more representative in the first three treatments. The T5 specimens had a dilution effect, which was different from that of the other nutrients (Figure 1C).

Figure 1 Vector nomograms of the nutritional condition of nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P) and potassium (K) of Cedrela odorata L. seedlings at the end of the production period at the nursery 

Survival and growth in the field

At 17 months of planting, the average overall survival was 15 %. During the first two months, mortality was higher than 25 % (Table 4, Figure 2). The Log-Rank test showed highly significant differences among the treatments evaluated (X2 = 21.7, P = 0.0006). The highest survival rate was obtained in T1 plants (50 %), although there were no significant differences between those belonging to T2 and T3. There was a 100 % mortality in the T4 plants, even though this treatment differed only from T1 (Table 4). Although T2 and T3 had low survival at the end of the evaluation period, the treatments with the highest survival rate were over 80 % in the first six months (Figure 2).

Table 4 Estimated field survival of Cedrela odorata L. seedlings produced in containers of different volume and different doses of hydrogel at the nursery, according to the Kaplan-Meier method. 

T1 = 500 mL black polyethylene bag + without hydrogel; T2 = 500 ml polyethylene black bag + 2 g of hydrogel; T3 = 500 ml polyethylene black bag + 4 g of hydrogel; T4 = 380 mL tube containers + without hydrogel; T5 = 380 mL tube containers + 2 g of hydrogel; T6 = 380 mL tube containers + 4 g of hydrogel. *Different letters indicate statistical differences through the Log-Rank test.

Figure 2 Estimated survival function [S (t)] for the different nursery treatments evaluated at the Cedrela odorata L. plantation. 

During the growth period evaluated in the field, there were highly significant differences between treatments (P≥0.0001) both in height and in diameter. In both cases, T1 seedlings recorded the highest absolute growth rates. When comparing the values of this treatment against those of T4 (control) in height and diameter, differences were 200 % and 86 % higher, respectively (Figure 3A, B).

Figure 3 Growth in field (during the first six months of planting) in height (A) and diameter (B) of of Cedrela odorata L. seedlings produced in containers of different volume and doses of hydrogel at the nursery 

Discussion

At the nursery, the morphology and nutritional status of C. odorata seedlings are improved with the use of 500 mL containers and the addition of 4 g of hydrogel per liter of substrate (Table 2). This response is attributed to the conditions generated in the growth medium, since both factors make it up. The growth medium positively affects plant growth when it provides water, nutrients and oxygen at appropriate levels.

In that context, the interaction between the 500 mL container (polyethylene bag) and the 4 g dose of hydrogel (T3), suggests a positive synergistic response that favored, in the first instance, the radical growth. The root biomass formation of the seedlings of this treatment was 1.71 times greater than that of the seedlings of the control treatment (Table 2). From this, it is likely, as shown by Orikiriza et al., that as they had a good root growth, the seedling of T3 showed a greater water absorption capacity as well as of nutriments and oxigen, which favores a good development of the rest of their structures (Table 2) and an adequate nutritional status (Figure 1A, B, C). This hypothesis is supported by studies whose context is similar to that of this paper. For example, Annapurna et al. (2004), Ferraz and Engel (2011), Lisboa et al., (2012) and Abreu et al. (2014) report a better growth and greater formation of aerial and radical biomass in seedlings of different forest species, as the greater the volume of the container with which they are produced at the nursery. Also, the incorporation of hydrogel to the substrate shows a beneficial effect on the growth and biomass formation of seedlings of other species in works developed by Orikiriza et al. (2009), Maldonado et al. (2011), Chirino et al. (2011), Bernardi et al. (2012) and Navroski et al. (2015).

Although in plant growth there are effects associated with the type of packaging (in relation to the type of material, shape, color, etc.) as recorded in the works of Wightman et al. (2001) and Tauer and Cole (2009), the responses obtained by volume are attributed to the greater space available to plants to grow in radical biomass, since the packaging is a physical barrier that restricts growth

On the other hand, the benefits of the hydrogel coincide with the modification of the physical properties of the substrate, especially to the increase of the capacity of water retention readily available, a condition that influences in a positive way in the water state of the plants, which has been verified by the laboratory and field assays of Koupai et al. (2008) and Narjary et al. (2012).

In this study, neither the levels of the amount of water available in the substrate nor the water status of the seedlings were measured; however, the assumption that T3 seedlings have shown the best responses due to the increase in the water retention capacity readily available due to the addition of hydrogel (since they had more material by the volume of the bag), is related to the nutritional condition represented in the nomograms of vectors (Figure 1A, B, C). Unlike the seedlings of the other treatments, whose nutritions varied (Table 3, Figure 1A, B, C), the T3 seedlings presented a luxury consumption in N, P and K, despite the fact that the rate of fertilizer addition was the same for all treatments. It is inferred that the efficiency of this input was improved by the availability of water, which is consistent with well-known relationships in plants between water and nutrient absorption (Jones, 2005).

Conversely, in the field, the volume of the container and the addition of hydrogel affect the performance of the seedlings, but the most direct effect on its quality is associated with the first factor. During the initial six months of planting, the T1, T2 and T3 treatments recorded a better survival compared to T4, T5 and T6; but at 17 months, only T1 kept this behavior (Table 4, Figure 2) which is contrating to what was expected of T3, which at the time of planting, were morphologically and nutritionally better individuals. However, in statistical or operational terms with which reforestation success is evaluated (Conafor, 2012), the C. odorata survival in the field was not favorable for the whole set of treatments, since there was an overall average mortality of 85 %.

Field observations indicate that the soil was poorly drained (due to its clay texture, its field capacity of 34.5 %, saturation point of 64.4 %, water conductivity of 0.80 cm h-1 and apparent density of 1.18 g cm-3) and the presence of phytophagous insects on the site, as the main reasons of high mortality. Both causes correspond to the factors to which C. odorata is vulnerable in a forest plantation scheme (Calixto et al., 2015). Although the two conditions affected all seedlings, their characteristics determined the severity of the impact of each; in this regard, a differential effect was evidenced between treatment groups.

The seedlings of the treatments involving the 500 mL polyethylene bag (T1, T2 and T3) were killed mainly by attacks of grasshoppers and Hypsipyla grandella, whereas those developed in the 380 mL tube (T4, T5 and T6) died mostly by flooding. The susceptibility to herbivory in the plants of the first group of treatments, is based on the hypothesis of plant vigor according to reviews by Baraza et al. (2007). Its healthy look and the nutritional quality of its tissues, apparently favored a focus of insects, as Medinaceli et al. (2004) experimentally proved it. On the other hand, the loss of seedlings of the second group is attributed to the alterations created in the soil by flooding and the low capacity of the seedlings to tolerate stress due to their lower morphological and physiological characteristics (Pardos, 2004) (Table 2).

Contrary to the reactions derived from the nursery stage and similar to the survival response, the best absolute growths in height and diameter did not correspond to seedlings with the best quality characteristics (T3), but to those of T1 (Figure 3). In addition to the positive effect of the volume of the container where they were produced, whose responses coincide with those obtained in other studies (Aphalo and Rikala, 2003; Prieto et al., 2007), the superior field growth of T1 seedlings is linked to lack of hydrogels in its root ball. Probably due to the poor drainage conditions in the soil of the plantation site, the seedlings retained less water compared to those with hydrogel, which reduced the waterlogging impacts described by Pardos (2004). Being less affected by this condition, the better availability of oxygen and nutrients (which did not have the other seedlings with the lowest growth), allowed them a more outstanding performance. The limitation exerted by the hydrogel contrasts with the generally recognized benefits of this material, which is consistent because the hydrogel effectiveness has been analyzed mostly in drought contexts (Chirino et al., 2011, Orikiriza et al., 2013).

These findings have practical implications for reforestation with C. odorata. Experimental evidence suggests avoiding the use of hydrogels in poor drainage soils, and instead producing plants in containers whose volume is sufficient to produce a vigorous and competitive plant with high rates of growth that enable them to rapidly evade vulnerability phases on the field; however, this recommendation should be subject to a cost-benefit analysis, such as that carried out by Puértolas et al. (2012).

Conclusions

There was a positive effect on the morphological quality and nutritional status of C. odorata seedlings at the nursery, the greater the volume of the container with which they are produced and the addition of hydrogel to the substrate, in doses of 4 g per liter. The volume of the container and the addition of hydrogel affected the performance of the seedlings in the field, but the most direct effect on their quality is associated with the first factor.

Acknowledgements

The authors express their total gratitude to Norberto Pérez Silva and Styv de Jesús Calva for the technical support in the collection and benefit of germplasm. Likewise, special thanks to the Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Venustiano Carranza for the support provided in its facilities to carry out this work.

REFERENCES

Abreu, A. H. M., P. S. S Leles, L. A. Melo, D. H. A. A. Ferreira e F. A. S Monteiro. 2014. Produção de mudas e crescimento inicial em campo de Enterolobium contortisiliquum produzidas em diferentes recipientes. Floresta 45:141-150. DOI: 10.5380/rf.v451i.28931. [ Links ]

Annapurna, D., T. S. Rathore and G. Joshi. 2004. Effect of container type and size on the growth and quality of seedlings of Indian sandalwood (Santalum album L.). Australian Forestry 67:82-87. DOI: 10.1080/00049158.2004.10676211. [ Links ]

Aphalo P. and R. Rikala. 2003. Field performance of silver-birch planting-stock grown at different spacing and in containers of different volume. New Forests 25:93-108. [ Links ]

Baraza, E., R. Zamora, J. A. Hódar, J. M. Gómez. 2007. Plant-herbivore interaction: beyond a binary vision. Functional plant ecology. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL, USA. pp. 482-499. [ Links ]

Basave V., E., V. M. Cetina A., M. A. López L., A. Aldrete and D. H. Del Valle Paniagua. 2015. Nursery practices increase seedling performance on nutrient-poor soils in Swietenia humilis. Forest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 8:552-557. DOI: 10.3832/ifor179-007. [ Links ]

Bernardi, M. R., M. Sperotto J., O. Daniel e A. C. T. Vitorino. 2012. Crescimento de mudas de Corymbia citriodora em função do uso de hidrogel e adubação. CERNE 18:67-74. [ Links ]

Calixto, C. G., M. A. López L., A. Equihua, D. E. Lira G. y V. M. Cetina A. 2015. Crecimiento de Cedrela odorata e incidencia de Hypsipyla grandella en respuesta al manejo nutrimental. Bosque (Valdivia) 36:265-273. DOI: 10.4067/s0717-92002015000200012. [ Links ]

Chirino, E., A. Vilagrosa and V. R. Vallejo. 2011. Using hydrogel and clay to improve the water status of seedlings for dryland restoration. Plant and Soil 344:99-10. DOI: 10.1007/s104-01-0730-1. [ Links ]

Comisión Nacional Forestal (Conafor). 2012. Evaluación complementaria del PROCOREF ejercicio fiscal 2011. Comisión Nacional Forestal, Zapopan, Jal., México. 325 p. [ Links ]

Ferraz, A. d. V. e V. L. Engel. 2011. Efeito do tamanho de tubetes na qualidade de mudas de jatobá (Hymenaea courbaril L. var. stilbocarpa (Hayne) Lee et Lang.), IPÊ-Amarelo (Tabebuia chrysotricha (Mart. ex DC.) Sandl.) e guarucaia (Parapiptadenia rigida (Benth.) Brenan). Revista Árvore 35:413-423. [ Links ]

Haase, D. L. and R. Rose. 1995. Vector analysis and its use for interpreting plant nutrient shifts in response to silvicultural treatments. Forest Science 41:54-66. [ Links ]

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. México (Inegi). 2009. Prontuario de información geográfica municipal de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Venustiano Carranza, Puebla. Clave geoestadística 2194., México D. F., México. s/p [ Links ]

Jacobs, D. F. and K. M. Wilkinson. 2009. Planning crops and developing propagation protocols. Nursery manual for native plants: a guide for tribal nurseries. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Washington, DC, USA. pp. 33-53. [ Links ]

Jones, J. B. 2005. The plant root: its roles and functions, hydroponics: a practical guide for the soilless grower. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL, USA. pp. 19-28. [ Links ]

Johnson, J. D. and M. L. Cline. 1991. Seedling quality of Southern Pines. Forest Regeneration Manual. Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands. pp. 143-159. [ Links ]

Koupai, J. A., S.S. Eslamian and J. A. Kazemi. 2008. Enhancing the available water content in unsaturated soil zone using hydrogel to improve plant growth indices. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 8:67- 75. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10104-009-0005-0. [ Links ]

Lisboa, A. C., P. S. d. Santos, S. N. d. Oliveira Neto, D. N.d. Castro e A. H. M. d. Abreu. 2012. Efeito do volume de tubetes na produção de mudas de Calophyllum brasiliense e Toona ciliata. Revista Árvore 36:603-609. [ Links ]

López L., M. Á. y J. Alvarado L.. 2010. Interpretación de nomogramas de análisis de vectores para diagnóstico nutrimental de especies forestales. Madera y Bosques 16:99-108. [ Links ]

Maldonado B., K. R., A. Aldrete, J. López U., H. Vaquera H. y V. M. Cetina A. 2011. Producción de Pinus greggii Engelm. en mezclas de sustrato con hidrogel y riego en vivero. Agrociencia 45:389-398. [ Links ]

Medinaceli, A., N. P. Flores S., F. Miranda A. y E. Gutiérrez C. 2004. Herbivoría en relación al tamaño de la planta y a las diferencias de exposición de Pilea sp. (Urticaceae) en la Estación Biológica Tunquini, Cotapata, La Paz Bolivia. Ecología en Bolivia 39:4-8. [ Links ]

Mesén, S. F. 2006. Prácticas de recolección, manejo y uso de germoplasma de especies forestales nativas en América Central y Sur de México. CATIE. Turrialba, Costa Rica. 62 p. [ Links ]

Narjary, B., P. Aggarwal, A. Singh, D. Chakraborty and R. Singh. 2012. Water availability in different soils in relation to hydrogel application. Geoderma 187-188:94-101. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.03.002. [ Links ]

Navroski, M. C., M. M. Araujo, C. S. Fior, F. d. S. Cunha, Á. L. P. Berghetti e M. d. O Pereira. 2015. Uso de hidrogel possibilita redução da irrigação e melhora o crescimento inicial de mudas de Eucalyptus dunnii Maiden. Scientia Forestalis 43:467-476. [ Links ]

Orikiriza, L. J. B., H. Agaba, M. Tweheyo, G. Eilu, J. D. Kabasa and A. Hüttermann. 2009. Amending soils with hydrogels increases the biomass of nine tree species under non-water stress conditions. CLEAN-Soil, Air, Water 37:615-620. DOI: 10.1002/clen.200900128. [ Links ]

Orikiriza. L. J. B., H. Agaba , G. Eilu , J. D. Kabasa, M. Worbes and A. Hüttermann . 2013. Effects of hydrogels on tree seedling performance in temperate soils before and after water stress. Journal of Environmental Protection 04:713-721. DOI: 10.4236/jep.2013.47082. [ Links ]

Pardos, J. A. 2004. Respuestas de las plantas al anegamiento del suelo. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales (Fuera de serie):101-107. [ Links ]

Prieto R., J. Á., P. A. D Calleros, E. H. C. Oviedo y J. J. Návar Ch. 2007. Efecto del envase y del riego en vivero en el establecimiento de Pinus cooperi Blanco en dos condiciones de sitio. Madera y Bosques 13:79-97. [ Links ]

Puértolas, J., D. F. Jacobs, L. F. Benito and J. L. Peñuelas. 2012. Cost-benefit analysis of different container capacities and fertilization regimes in Pinus stock-type production for forest restoration in dry Mediterranean areas. Ecological Engineering 44:210-215. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.04.005. [ Links ]

Ramírez G., C., G. Vera C., F. Carrillo A. y O. S. Magaña T. 2008. El cedro rojo (Cedrela odorata L.) como alternativa de reconversión en terrenos abandonados por la agricultura comercial en el sur de Tamaulipas. Agricultura Técnica en México 34:243-250. [ Links ]

Rodríguez T., D. A. 2008. Indicadores de calidad de planta forestal. Mundi-Prensa, México, D. F., México. 156 p. [ Links ]

Statistical Analysis System (SAS). 2009. SAS Version 9.2. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA. s/p [ Links ]

Tauer, P. K. and J. C. Cole. 2009. Effect of fabric and plastic containers on plant growth and root zone temperatures of four tree species. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 27:145-148. [ Links ]

Wightman, K. E., T. Shear, B. Goldfarb and J. Haggar. 2001. Nursery and field establishment techniques to improve seedling growth of three Costa Rican hardwoods. New Forests 22:75-96. [ Links ]

a Conflict of interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

b Contribution by author: Erickson Basave Villalobos: design and general approach of the experiment; structuring and writing of the article; Lucía Concepción García Castillo: establishment, maintenance and conduction of the nursery experiment; Aurelio Castro Ríos: establishment, maintenance and conduction of the experiment in the field; Celi Gloria Calixto Valencia: data collection, coordination and supervision of the experiment at the nursery and the field; José Ángel Sigala Rodríguez: procedure and statistical analysis of data; José Luis García Pérez: statistical analysis of data and revision of the manuscript.

Received: May 12, 2015; Accepted: June 2016

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons