SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número15El consentimiento y la falacia de la necesidad: una réplica a Beyleveld y BrownswordLa justicia o la injusticia del contrato de trabajo desde el pensamiento moral de Arthur Schopenhauer índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Problema anuario de filosofía y teoría del derecho

versión On-line ISSN 2448-7937versión impresa ISSN 2007-4387

Resumen

INOSTROZA ADASME, Sonia. Aristotle’s Ethics in the Evolution of the Legal Negligence: a Review About Foreseeability. Probl. anu. filos. teor. derecho [online]. 2021, n.15, pp.421-442.  Epub 31-Mayo-2022. ISSN 2448-7937.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487937e.2021.15.16128.

In the 4th century BC, Aristotle addressed the difference between ἁμάρτημα (negligence) and ἀδικημα (wrongdoing). Consequently, he distinguishes between voluntary and involuntary acts so as to arrive at such reasoning 200 years before Roman jurists did.

Although it is true that it is not possible to affirm an equivalent relationship between negligence, as it was conceived in the Greek world, with the thought of Roman jurisconsultants, it is possible to find the trace, the germ or essence of strict negligence, particularly in the treatment of involuntary acts.

Palabras llave : Aristotle; Fault; Negligence; Wrongdoing; Foreseeability.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español