SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 número1Análisis dosimétrico entre puntos «A» de Mánchester y volumen blanco clínico de alto riesgo en braquiterapia 3D guiada por imagen para el cáncer cervicouterinoFactores asociados a complicaciones en la reconstrucción en pacientes con cáncer de mama tratadas con mastectomía índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Gaceta mexicana de oncología

versión On-line ISSN 2565-005Xversión impresa ISSN 1665-9201

Resumen

BOURLON, María T. et al. Current status of urologic oncology clinics in Mexico. Gac. mex. oncol. [online]. 2021, vol.20, n.1, pp.12-19.  Epub 16-Abr-2021. ISSN 2565-005X.  https://doi.org/10.24875/j.gamo.20000074.

Background:

Most genitourinary (GU) neoplasms have several treatment options should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team. In Mexico, the status of urologic oncology clinics (UOCs) is unknown.

Objective:

Our aim was to evaluate the current status of UOC, determine the existence of GU-MTB, and define the resource disparities among centers in Mexico.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study based on an online survey developed by the Genitourinary Mexican Cooperative Research Group in Oncology. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.

Results:

Twenty UOCs were identified and were located in 8 of 32 states. Only 50% reported having a multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB). Medical oncology, urology, and radiation oncology participated in 90% of UOCs; nursing, social work, and research staff participation were absent. Ninety percent of MTBs reported discussing all GU neoplasms, one center exclusively discussed kidney cancer cases

Conclusions:

There are 20 institutions with these clinics in the country, they are located in only 3 of 32 states. The uneven geographical distribution and the unequal availability of resources reflect the disparity in access to health care services.

Palabras llave : Mexico; Urogenital neoplasms; Health-care disparities; Interdisciplinary communication.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )