SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.93 número4Evaluación del AMBU automatizado ESSI-1 INC diseñado en el Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio ChávezTercer Registro Nacional de Programas de Rehabilitación Cardiaca en México (RENAPREC III-2022) índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Archivos de cardiología de México

versión On-line ISSN 1665-1731versión impresa ISSN 1405-9940

Resumen

REINOSO-GONELL, Reynie L. et al. Corrected sinus node recovery time as a screening test in patients with typical atrial flutter post-ablation to predict pacemaker implantation. Arch. Cardiol. Méx. [online]. 2023, vol.93, n.4, pp.398-404.  Epub 28-Nov-2023. ISSN 1665-1731.  https://doi.org/10.24875/acm.22000031.

Objective:

The objective of the study was to establish the prognostic value of CSNRT regarding the necessity for pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial flutter (AFL) post-ablation.

Methods:

This prospective cohort study, conducted at the National Institute of Cardiology "Ignacio Chavez" in Mexico City, assessed patients who had undergone ablation procedures to correct AFL, posterior to which an autonomic blockade was performed, and CSNRT was measured.

Results:

The sample for this investigation was 40 patients. These were subdivided into two study groups depending on their requirement of pacemaker implant post-ablation (Pacemaker P, No Pacemaker NP). Sinus node (SN) dysfunction was diagnosed in 13 (32.5%) of the 40 participants, 10 (71.43%) of which required a pacemaker implant, while only 4 participants (28.57%) with normal SN function required pacemakers. Ten out of the 14 patients (71.43%) who required a pacemaker had an elevated CSNRT > 500 ms (p ≤ 0.01). Post-ablation CSNRT mean was 383.54 ms ± 67.96 ms in the NP group versus 1972.57 ms ± 3423.56 ms in the P group. Furthermore, SN pause in the P group had a mean of 1.86 s ± 0.96 s versus the NP group with 1.196 s ± 0.52 s.

Conclusion:

CSNRT has the potential to be a quantitative prognostic tool for the assessment of future pacemaker implants in patients with AFL post-ablation. This could aid in the timely diagnosis of sinus node dysfunction, which could, in the long run, result in the reduction of cardiac functional capacity loss due to cardiac remodeling.

Palabras llave : CSNRT; Atrial flutter; Pacemaker; Screening; Post-ablation.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés