SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.55 número163Against magnitude realismThe philosophical significance of the representational theory of measurement -RTM as semantic foundations índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Crítica (México, D.F.)

versión impresa ISSN 0011-1503

Resumen

PERRY, Zee R.. Explanatory problems for mass additivity and dynamics. Crítica (Méx., D.F.) [online]. 2023, vol.55, n.163, pp.45-80.  Epub 04-Jun-2024. ISSN 0011-1503.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2023.1408.

I present an argument against the view that the additivity of mass (i.e., the property according to which a composite object’s mass is the “sum” of its parts’) is metaphysically independent of dynamical laws governing massive bodies. In particular, taking additivity to be independent of dynamics commits you to widespread unexplained correlations between the mass properties of composites and the dynamic behavior of massive bodies. The second half of the paper extends this explanatory worry, showing that the very same considerations apply to aspects of mass’s quantitative structure. This gives rise to a new and powerful objection to certain influential theories about the fundamental structure of physical quantities -most notably the magnitude realism of Peacocke (2019) and the second-order absolutist accounts defended by Mundy (1987) and Eddon (2013b).

Palabras llave : quantities; metaphysics; mereology; center of mass; metaphysical explanation.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )