SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 número3Manejo actual de la hipertensión arterial con olmesartán: Primera experiencia clínica en pacientes mexicanosEvaluación postquirúrgica por ecocardiografía del paciente sometido a cambio valvular aórtico: ¿Se aplican las recomendaciones de las guías? índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de cardiología

versión impresa ISSN 0188-2198

Resumen

PALACIOS-RODRIGUEZ, Juan Manuel et al. Percutaneous revascularization therapy in patients of critical carotid-coronary stenosis: results in hospital and long term. Rev. Mex. Cardiol [online]. 2014, vol.25, n.3, pp.149-157. ISSN 0188-2198.

Objectives: To analyze the morbidity and mortality at 30 days and 6 months in patients taken to a Percutaneous Intervention (PI) for critical Carotid and coronary stenosis in a center of high volume expert in the treatment of multivessel disease. Background: The optimal treatment of patients with Carotid and Coronary disease concomitant remains controversial. A variety of therapeutic strategies, including coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), alone or in combination with percutaneous or surgical revascularization of the carotid artery have been reported. Material and methods: Between January 1998 and June 2013, 118 patients with (149 lesions) carriers of Coronary and Carotid disease (symptomatic carotid stenosis in 37.6%) were treated as staged or simultaneous PI Carotid-Coronary stenting. The primary endpoint (EP) to assess the incidence of major cerebrovascular and cardiac events (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular accident major) within 30 days after the first and second proceedings, with EuroSCORE (ES) 2.75 ± 1.5 avg. Results: The incidence of EP was 4.02%, global death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cerebral vascular accident major (CVAM) occurred in 2.01, 1.34 and 0.67% respectively. In group Asx versus Sx we not observed a greater difference in the CVAM and death 2.14% versus 2.14%, p = 0.809 both groups, however in AMI was higher in Asx versus Sx group 4.3% versus 0%, p = 0.053. At 6 month follow up 4 patients underwent CABG one dies, 3 patients more presented AMI and death, 0% ipsilateral CVA, 1.4% had carotid stent restenosis with being treated PTA. Conclusions: In patients with carotid and coronary stenosis concomitant, combined percutaneous treatment compares very favorably to previous surgical or hybrid experiences less obvious MACE. This strategy may be particularly suited to more complex patients with high surgical risk.

Palabras llave : Carotid stenosis; coronary angioplasty; coronary stenosis; myocardial infarction.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons