SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 número2Desarrollo y Simulación de un Algoritmo de Control Automatizado para Insulinoterapia de Urgencias Hiperglucémicas en DiabetesUna Aproximación Socio-técnica a la Evaluación de un Expediente Médico Electrónico implementado en Servicios de Salud Públicos de Aguascalientes índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de ingeniería biomédica

versión On-line ISSN 2395-9126versión impresa ISSN 0188-9532

Resumen

DALMAU-CEDENO, Oscar S.; ALVARADO-CARRILLO, Dora E.  y  MARROQUIN, José Luis. Regularized Hypothesis Testing in Random Fields with Applications to Neuroimaging. Rev. mex. ing. bioméd [online]. 2020, vol.41, n.2, pp.22-39.  Epub 09-Nov-2020. ISSN 2395-9126.  https://doi.org/10.17488/rmib.41.2.2.

The task of determining for which elements of a random field (e.g., pixels in an image) a certain null hypothesis may be rejected is a relevant problem in several scientific areas. In the current contribution, we introduce a new method for performing this task, the regularized hypothesis testing (RHT) method, focusing on its use in neuroimaging research. RHT is based on the formulation of the hypothesis testing task as a Bayesian estimation problem, with the previous application of a Markovian random field. The latter allows for the incorporation of local spatial information and considers different noise models, including spatially correlated noise. In tests on synthetic data showing regular activation levels on uncorrelated noise fields, RHT furnished a true positive rate (TPR) of 0.97, overcoming the state-of-the-art morphology-based hypothesis testing (MBHT) method and the traditional family-wise error rate (FWER) method, which afforded 0.93 and 0.58, respectively. For fields with highly correlated noise, the TPR provided by RHT was 0.65, and by MBHT and FWER was 0.35 and 0.29, respectively. For tests utilizing real functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, RHT managed to locate the activation regions when 60% of the original signal were removed, while MBHT located only one region and FWER located none.

Palabras llave : Regularized hypothesis test; Markovian random fields; Bayesian estimation; functional Magnetic resonance imaging.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés