SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.88 número5Hallazgos ecocardiográficos en el embarazo y posparto tardío en mujeres mexicanas sanasSupervivencia a 5 años de pacientes con cáncer de mama: experiencia en una institución de Jalisco, México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Ginecología y obstetricia de México

versión impresa ISSN 0300-9041

Resumen

BARROSO-VILLA, Gerardo et al. Euploid blastocyst rate in follicular vs luteal phase (DuoStim) in women with poor ovarian response: Preliminary study in Mexico. Ginecol. obstet. Méx. [online]. 2020, vol.88, n.5, pp.306-311.  Epub 20-Sep-2021. ISSN 0300-9041.  https://doi.org/10.24245/gom.v88i5.3935.

OBJECTIVE:

Euploid blastocyst rate comparison between ovarian stimulation in follicular vs luteal phase performed in the same menstrual cycle in patients with poor ovarian response.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Clinical, prospective and comparative study conducted at Centro de Reproducción Arcos S.C., “Nascere”, during january-july, 2019. Patients with PGT-A indication and poor ovarian response according to Bologna criteria were included. Under a short GnRH-antagonist protocol, stimulations, both in follicular and luteal phase were performed using rFSH/rLH (2:1) from day 3 of the cycle and 5 days after the first oocyte retrieval. In addition, ovulation trigger with an GnRH agonist was used, finally, on day 5-6 of embryo development, trophoctoctoderm biopsy was performed.

RESULTS:

In this study, 20 patients were included; when comparing follicular phase vs luteal phase, we found that fertilization rate was 79% (95%CI 29-46) vs 55% (95%CI 34-53), blastocysts rate was 42% (95%CI 19-44) vs 45% (95%CI 24-55) and euploid embryo rate was 100% (95%CI 44-53) vs 70% (95%CI 38-46). Only the oocyte recovery rate in metaphase II showed significant differences between both phases 40% (IC 95% 18-37) vs 59% (IC 95% 31-59), p=0.0333.

CONCLUSION:

Biphasic ovarian stimulation (follicular/ luteal) in the same menstrual cycle (DuoStim) resulted in a higher metaphase II ooctye recovery rate during the luteal phase in comparison with the follicular phase. However, the rates of blastocysts and euploid blastocysts were similar between both phases.

Palabras llave : Blastocyst; Ovarian stimulation; Luteal phase; Menstrual cycle; Follicular phase; Oocyte retrieval; Metaphase; Ovulation induction.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español