SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.91 número2Costo del retiro anticipado de métodos de planificación familiarEpilepsia y embarazo: particularidades y tratamiento índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Ginecología y obstetricia de México

versión impresa ISSN 0300-9041

Resumen

CALULL-BAGO, Anna et al. Repeat biopsy in case of amplification failure. Ginecol. obstet. Méx. [online]. 2023, vol.91, n.2, pp.100-108.  Epub 05-Mayo-2023. ISSN 0300-9041.  https://doi.org/10.24245/gom.v91i2.8276.

OBJECTIVE:

To analyze possible factors associated with amplification failures, euploidy and clinical outcomes between repeat and single biopsy embryos (control group).

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Retrospective multicenter study involving 4,106 blastocysts from 1,007 ICSI cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy performed by next generation sequencing. In case of DNA amplification failure, the IVF center where biopsies were performed, the day of biopsy, the embryo quality and the incidence of complications during biopsy were analyzed. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy results and clinical outcomes were compared between re-biopsied embryos and the control group.

RESULTS:

Of the 4,106 blastocysts included in this study, 96.0% (3,942) obtained a result while 4.0% (164) had an amplification failure. Ninety-nine embryos with amplification failure were re-biopsied and 83.8% resulted in an informative diagnosis. Euploidy rates were equivalent between re-biopsied and control blastocysts (34.9% vs 39.7%, P>0.05). The only factor significantly affecting the amplification failure rates was the IVF center. No differences were observed between biopsy days or embryo quality. Pregnancy (51.0% vs 58.3%), implantation (63.9% vs 61.5%) and miscarriage rates (16.9% vs 28.6%) were similar between single and repeat biopsied embryos, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The centre was the main factor influencing amplification failures. Euploidy rates and clinical outcomes did not differ between the control group and repeat biopsied embryos; therefore, repeat biopsy is recommended for embryos with amplification failure.

Palabras llave : Amplification failure; PGT-A; Repeat biopsy; Blastocyst.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español