SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31Gobernar los Comunes de la Energía europeos: normas y condiciones locales en España“Torcer” la fe para sanar: mujeres, iglesias incluyentes y terapéuticas psicoespirituales índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Convergencia

versión On-line ISSN 2448-5799versión impresa ISSN 1405-1435

Resumen

PIGNUOLI OCAMPO, Sergio. Metatheorizing as Prelude in Latour and Luhmann: A Comparative Perspective. Convergencia [online]. 2024, vol.31, e21922.  Epub 06-Mayo-2024. ISSN 2448-5799.  https://doi.org/10.29101/crcs.v31i0.21922.

This paper compares the strategies of metatheorization used in Luhmann's General Theory of Social Systems and Bruno Latour's Actor-Network Theory. The methodology is based on George Ritzer's approach and techniques, with an additional operationalization to disaggregate the strategies into two dimensions: double differentiation and elaboration of antecedents. Without prejudice to the divergences pointed out, the results obtained show two significant convergences between the two strategies. Firstly, in terms of double differentiation, both programs define a third radical position. Second, in terms of elaboration of antecedents, both programs opt for a reflexive dialogue with interactionism and for the justification of interdisciplinarity in sociology's deficits.

Palabras llave : metatheorizing; conceptual elaboration; Social Systems Theory; Actor-Network Theory; dyadism.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español | Inglés