SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 número35El lugar de lo político en el discurso de las políticas públicasDesacuerdos sobre derechos Waldron y Dworkin sobre parlamentos y tribunales índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Andamios

versión On-line ISSN 2594-1917versión impresa ISSN 1870-0063

Resumen

GURZA LAVALLE, Adrian. Beyond the paradox in Pitkin. For a dual conception of representation. Andamios [online]. 2017, vol.14, n.35, pp.123-157. ISSN 2594-1917.

Contemporary theories of representation are unanimous about the relational nature of representation. However, relational understandings of representation do not necessarily accept the latter is constituted by a duality. This paper argues that relational but not dual theories of representation tend to be flawed in two ways: they present normative deficits and thus are unable to evaluate representation; and when they do so, it is at the expenses of introducing analytical inconsistencies. To support such argument, a demanding analytical strategy is adopted: examining Pitkin’s famous paradox transformation in order to show both normative deficits and analytical inconsistencies in her classic The Concept of Representation, which is deemed as pioneering work in putting forward a dual definition of representation. I claim that dual understanding of democratic representation implies that the latter is constituted by am irreducible tension between two agents —represented/representative—, which turns representation inescapable ambivalent and agonistic.

Palabras llave : Democratic representation; Pitkin; the concept of representation; congruency regimes; duality.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )