Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
- Accesos
Links relacionados
- Similares en SciELO
Compartir
Valenciana
versión impresa ISSN 2007-2538
Resumen
FERREYRA, Julián. Fichte or Deleuze, who is the dogmatic?. Valenciana [online]. 2018, vol.11, n.21, pp.257-288. ISSN 2007-2538. https://doi.org/10.15174/rv.v0i21.326.
Fichte and Deleuze question each other as they characterize -each in his own fashion - the dogmatism as the enemy of the authentic philosophical thinking. In this paper, we will reconstruct and compare such characterizations in order to examine both ontologies and consider the munder a new light. In Deleuze, we will study how the I -all of whose dimensions are placed in the empirical field- can affirm something in a non-dogmatic way about the fields that are its transcendental condition: the intensive and the virtual. In Fichte, we will reject the interpretation of the famous sentence I = I as a form of identity, in order to understand it as an immanence that produces eternally the multiplicity of the real.
Palabras llave : Dogmatism; Deleuze; Fichte; Immanence; I=I.