SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29 número2La inclusión como elemento determinante de la pobreza en personas del colectivo LGBTI+ en MéxicoNucleosíntesis en el cosmos: lo que creemos que sabemos y las preguntas por venir índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Ciencia ergo sum

versión On-line ISSN 2395-8782versión impresa ISSN 1405-0269

Resumen

SOLOVIEVA, Yulia; QUINTANAR ROJAS, Luis; BALTAZAR RAMOS, Ana María  y  ESCOTTO CORDOVA, Eduardo Alejandro. Vigotsky’s cultural-historical position is not constructivist. Cienc. ergo-sum [online]. 2022, vol.29, n.2, e158.  Epub 20-Oct-2023. ISSN 2395-8782.  https://doi.org/10.30878/ces.v29n2a3.

From a theoretical and methodological perspective, we provide analyses of cultural-historical psychology to identify its differences with constructivism. As well as the origin of psychological development and the usage of “cultural” and “social” terms. The article discusses about the method used in cultural historical psychological approach and its implications for the organization of the teaching-learning process. The authors conclude on the need to differentiate between Vigotsky’s approach and postmodern constructivism according to conceptual, methodological, and epistemological basis.

Palabras llave : historical-cultural psychology; psychological theories; constructivism; nature of development; methods of analysis in psychology.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español