SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.88 número6Reparación de hernias paraesofágicas gigantes asistida por robot en un hospital de cuarto nivel en Bogotá, Colombia, Clínica Shaio: serie de casos y revisión de la literaturaPropiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Evaluación Funcional para el Tratamiento del Cáncer, versión próstata (FACT-P), en pacientes mexicanos índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Cirugía y cirujanos

versión On-line ISSN 2444-054Xversión impresa ISSN 0009-7411

Resumen

ZUHDY, Mohamed et al. Electro-thermal bipolar vessel sealing versus clipping of the inferior mesenteric vessels during minimally invasive proctectomy. Cir. cir. [online]. 2020, vol.88, n.6, pp.738-744.  Epub 08-Nov-2021. ISSN 2444-054X.  https://doi.org/10.24875/ciru.19001745.

Introduction:

The introduction of new energy vessel sealing devices in minimally invasive proctectomy led to better hemostatic effect, less blood loss, and shorter operating time. At present, the available evidence from literature about the use of electro-thermal bipolar vessel sealers (EBVS) in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is weak where most studies are retrospective with non-homogenous patient groups.

Methods:

This is a retrospective cohort study where 40 rectal cancer patients operated by laparoscopic TME or laparoscopic assisted transanal total mesorectal excision were classified in two groups according to approach of inferior mesenteric vessels ligation (EBVS versus Clipping).

Results:

The operative time was significantly longer and the blood loss was significantly more in the EBVS group. However, hospital stay, time to oral, time to starting stoma function, and number of retrieved lymph nodes were not significantly affected by the method of vascular control.

Conclusion:

Both methods for control of vascular pedicle during minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery are safe, as such it is at the discretion of the operating surgeon to which method to use. Prospective well-designed trials are awaited to provide stronger evidence.

Palabras llave : Energy devices; Ligasure; Rectal cancer; Minimally invasive surgery; Total mesorectal excision.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés