Introduction
Population's life expectancy is increasing. It is projected that by 2050, individuals aged 90 years and older will represent 2% of the population in the USA1. Although Ecuadorian life expectancy is lower than others (76.4 years)2, the incidence of gallstones and its complications rise with age because of increasing lithogenicity of bile and gallbladder dysfunction3. By age 90 years, > 24% of men and 35% of women have gallstones1,4.
Some authors describe age as the main factor that increases the morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing surgery for acute cholecystitis5. Besides that, elderly patients have a reduced physiological capacity, which, associated with their comorbidities, make surgeons reluctance to perform cholecystectomy in these patients1. Despite that, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is currently considered the gold standard in the treatment of acute cholecystitis in the elderly6. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed in many patients of up to 85 years, as previously demonstrated7. However, the optimal management of acute cholecystitis in patients older than 90 years is less clear. Few studies have evaluated the safety of patients older than 90 years after cholecystectomy, but most of these studies included a mix population, patients ≥ 65 years8 and only one of them was done in a developing country6. Our aim is to assess the safety of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients older than 90 years with acute cholecystitis and its complications, in a tertiary center of a developing country.
Materials and methods
This retrospective study included patients aged 90 years and older with acute cholecystitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Vozandes Hospital Quito-Ecuador between January 2010 and December 2016. The diagnosis of acute cholecystitis and its grade was established by using the Tokyo 2013 criteria9. Patients with Grade III cholecystitis, in whom the systemic organ failure was transient and recovered quickly were included in the study. However, those cases when the systemic organ failure was persistent (> 9 days) underwent percutaneous cholecystectomy and were excluded from the study. Moreover, cases with choledocolithiasis and malignant neoplasm of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts were excluded from the study. The variables examined were sex, comorbidities, time between diagnosis and surgery, the risk of perioperative morbidity using the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Tokyo severity, rate of conversion to open surgery and its reasons, post-operative complications and mortality, and length of hospital stay.
Pre-operative studies, such as hepatobiliary ultrasound, blood test, chest X-ray, and electrocardiogram, were performed. The statistical software SPSS version 12 was used as an instrument for data collection and for statistical analysis. For categorical variables, frequencies and percentages were reported. For the numerical variables, the mean was used.
Results
Fifteen patients aged between 90 and 96 years were included in the study. About 53% of patients were men and 60% of patients had ASA III. Blood tests showed a mean leukocytes of 29 334 and a mean pre-operative hemoglobin of 14.43 g/L. Grade II cholecystitis was found in 8 (53%) patients, whereas Grade III cholecystitis in 4 (27%). Only 5 (33%) patients had a delayed surgery (surgery performed after 7 days). This was necessary to stabilize these patients.
Regarding the post-operative variables, there were only three post-operative complications: hypovolemic shock secondary to bleeding that stop without reoperation in 2 patients (13%) and delirium in 1 patient (7%). The conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery was 13% (2 patients). The reason for conversion was the impossibility of visualizing the anatomical structures and obtains an adequate critical view of safety due to gallbladder phlegmon in two patients. There were no cases of inability to create pneumoperitoneum. The mean surgical time was 98.3 min. Finally, all patients were discharged after a mean length of hospital stay of 7.2 days (Tables 1-2).
Variables | |
---|---|
Overall population, n (%) | 15 (100) |
Age, mean (years) | 92.3 |
Sex, n (%) | |
Female | 7 (47) |
Male | 8 (53) |
Comorbidities, n (%) | |
Cardiovascular disease | 9 (60) |
Pulmonary disease | 4 (27) |
Chronic renal insufficiency | 0 (0) |
Diabetes | 2 (13) |
Pre-operative test, mean | |
Leukocytes (x10 9/ml) | 29 334 |
Hemoglobin (g/L) | 14.42 |
ASA, n (%) | |
II | 3 (20) |
III | 9 (60) |
IV | 3 (20) |
Cholecystitis severity, n (%) | |
I | 3 (20) |
II | 8 (53) |
III | 4 (27) |
Time between diagnosis and surgery, days | |
< 7 days | 10 (67) |
> 7 days | 5 (33) |
Operative time, mean (min) | 98.3 |
Conversion, n (%) | |
Yes | 2 (13) |
No | 13 (87) |
Reason for conversion, n (%) | |
Inability to create pneumoperitoneum | 0 (0) |
Intraoperative bleeding | 0 (0) |
Improper display of structures | 2 (13) |
Post-operative complications, n (%) | |
Hypovolemic shock | 2 (13) |
Delirium | 1 (7) |
Mortality | 0 (0) |
Length of hospital stay, mean (days) | 7.2 |
Variables | Delay of surgery | ASA score | Comorbidities | Conversion | Post-operative complications | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cholecystitis severity | < 7 days (n) | > 7 days (n) | II (n) | III (n) | IV (n) | Cardiovascular disease (n) | Pulmonary disease (n) | Chronic kidney disease (n) | Diabetes (n) | Yes (n) | No (n) | Yes (n) | No(n) |
I | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
II | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
III | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
Total | 10 | 5 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 3 | 12 |
Discussion
Cholecystectomy is the most common general surgery procedure performed in elderly patients due to the high incidence of gallstones1. Unfortunately, the comorbidities and the age of these patients have limited the therapeutic options, as it is showed in a study reported that < 25% of patients who met criteria for elective cholecystectomy underwent cholecystectomy10. This contrasts with our findings, as all the patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, despite its age and comorbidities.
The optimal moment to perform a cholecystectomy is not well defined for this population. Comorbidities presented in very old patients may require prior stabilization that will delay the intervention. Therefore, taking the recommendations for younger patients11,12, we tried to performed early laparoscopic cholecystectomy, whenever it was possible, since it is associated with fewer complications, shorter hospital stay, faster physiological post-operative, and cost reduction6,13. In our study, 5 of our patients present a significant delay for more than a week due to comorbidities.
Tokyo guidelines9 do not consider advanced age as a risk factor per se; however, they emphasize the tendency of older patients to develop severe acute cholecystitis13. This is in line with our study, as the majority of our patients had Grades II-III acute cholecistitis. On the other hand, the ASA score greater than or equal to III is a risk factor that triggers complications and even death in elderly patients14. In our study, more than 80% of patients had ASA III - IV and all the complication happened in these patients. Moreover, the surgical time has been described by many authors as a post-operative risk factor; a cholecystectomy lasting more than 100 min increases the probability of complications by 6 times compared to a shorter duration15. In our study, the mean intraoperative time was less (98.3 min), which may explain the low rate of post-operative complications.
It has been shown that the patient's age, male sex, the degree of cholecystitis, and the prolonged interval between the appearance of symptoms and the surgical intervention are related to a greater probability of conversion to laparotomy, due to difficult intervention16. In our study, the conversion to open surgery occurs in two patients, and its reason for conversion was the impossibility to visualize anatomical structures and obtain an adequate critical view of safety due to gallbladder phlegmon. Our conversion rate (13%) is in accordance with the literature17, showing that advanced age entails a little risk of conversion to an open procedure.
Our study is limited mainly by its retrospective nature. Furthermore, our numbers were small, and therefore, the possibility of type II error cannot be ruled out; therefore, larger studies should evaluate this approach. Among the strong points of the study, we can name that this is the first study done in a tertiary center in a developing country.
Conclusion
Cholecystectomy is the most common general surgery procedure performed in elderly patients and the choice of therapeutic options should not be limited neither by the age per se, nor by the disease severity. Based in recent advances in laparoscopic techniques, perioperative care improvement and based on the results obtained in this study, we believe that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a valid option in patients over 90 years of age due its relatively low rate of complications and conversion. Larger studies should evaluate this approach, as the population's life expectancy is increasing.