Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
- Accesos
Links relacionados
- Similares en SciELO
Compartir
Computación y Sistemas
versión On-line ISSN 2007-9737versión impresa ISSN 1405-5546
Resumen
PEREZ-RAVE, Jorge y GONZALEZ ECHAVARRIA, Favián. Classification Trees vs. Logistics Regression in the Generic skill Development in Engineering. Comp. y Sist. [online]. 2018, vol.22, n.4, pp.1519-1541. Epub 10-Feb-2021. ISSN 2007-9737. https://doi.org/10.13053/cys-22-4-2804.
From an experimental approach, the performance of Logistic Regression vs Classification Trees is evaluated in the context of two generic engineering skills (quantitative reasoning and reading comprehension). These methods incorporate two separate predictor scenarios (indicators only, and only constructs derived from Principal Component Analysis: ACP). The sample is 7,395 instances of Saber Pro 2015- 3, 2014-3 (Colombia). The study considers: training (70% of the sample), prediction (30% remaining) and experimentation (176 original observations, design of three factors: method, type of predictor and competence). The response variable is a new metric (Underlying Asset Ratio obtained by ACP). Both methods present similar performance in the scenario of only indicators, but not in the scenario of constructs (Regression Logistics, better performance).
Palabras llave : Logistic regression; classification tree; engineering skills.