Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
texto en 
Inglés (pdf)
Artículo en XML
Referencias del artículo
Traducción automática
Enviar artículo por emailIndicadores
-
Citado por SciELO -
Accesos
Links relacionados
-
Similares en
SciELO
Compartir
Permalink
Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias
versión On-line ISSN 2448-6698versión impresa ISSN 2007-1124
Rev. mex. de cienc. pecuarias vol.12 no.4 Mérida oct./dic. 2021 Epub 06-Jun-2022
https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v12i4.5796
Articles
Relationships between seasonality, body characteristics and leptin at the beginning of puberty in Bos taurus taurus and Bos taurus indicus heifers in the Mexican tropics
a Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP). Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal. Querétaro, México.
b INIFAP. Campo Experimental Las Margaritas, Puebla, México.
c Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia. Ciudad de México, México.
d INIFAP. Campo Experimental La Posta. Veracruz, México.
e INIFAP. Campo Experimental La Campana. Chihuahua, México.
The study analyzed, in two years, the effects of breed [Brahman (BHM; n= 65); Braunvieh (BR; n= 56)], supplementation with Zilpaterol® (ZIL; treated or control), season of birth (spring or autumn) and their interactions on body surface (BS), age (APB), body weight (WPB), body condition (BC), long dorsal muscle (DM) depth, dorsal fat (DF) thickness and serum leptin concentration (LEP) at puberty (PB) of 121 heifers. At PB, BMHs were heavier and older than BRs (376.8 ± 7.4 vs 302.0 ± 6.6 kg; 588.1 ± 14.7 vs 445.5 ± 12.5 days). ZIL increased APB, WPB, BC and DM, but did not affect DF and LEP. BHMs had 18 % more BS than BRs. However, the difference in WPB/BS was only 6.4 %. When metabolic weight (MW) was used as a proportion of BS (MW/BS) instead of WPB, the difference between BHM and BR disappeared (P>0.05). The DF was 63.7 % higher in BHM than in BR. Those born in spring started PB with 24.4 % less DF than those born in autumn. Most of the BHM heifers (73.8 %) started PB in the months when light hours were increasing (P<0.05), while in BRs, the beginning of PB was uniformly distributed throughout the year, regardless of the length of light hours; this effect was present in the two years of study. It is concluded that the establishment of puberty is a multifactorial phenomenon; seasonality affects BHM and BR differently and, apparently, BS is an important factor, probably associated with efficiency in energy use. This paper reiterates the importance of dorsal fat and documents, for the first time, MW/BS and its association with the establishment of puberty.
Key words Puberty; Body surface; Seasonality; Tropical cattle; Leptin
El estudio analizó, en dos años, los efectos de raza [Brahman (BHM; n= 65); Suizo Europeo (SE; n= 56)], suplementación con Zilpaterol® (ZIL; tratadas o testigo), estación de nacimiento (primavera u otoño) y sus interacciones, sobre superficie corporal (SC), edad (EPB), peso corporal (PPB), condición corporal (CC), profundidad del músculo largo dorsal (MD), grosor de grasa dorsal (GD) y concentración sérica de leptina (LEP) a la pubertad (PB) de 121 vaquillas. A la PB, las BHM fueron más pesadas y tuvieron más edad que las SE (376.8 ± 7.4 vs 302.0 ± 6.6 kg; 588.1 ± 14.7 vs 445.5 ± 12.5 días). ZIL aumentó EPB, PPB, CC y MD, pero no afectó GD y LEP. Las BHM tuvieron 18 % más SC que las SE. Sin embargo, la diferencia en PPB/SC fue sólo de 6.4 %. Cuando se usó peso metabólico (PM) como proporción de la SC (PM/SC) en lugar de PPB, la diferencia entre BHM y SE desapareció (P>0.05). El GD fue 63.7 % mayor en BHM que en SE. Las nacidas en primavera iniciaron la PB con 24.4 % menos GD que las nacidas en otoño. La mayoría de las vaquillas BHM (73.8 %) inició la PB en los meses en que las horas luz iban en aumento (P<0.05), mientras que en las SE el inicio de la PB estuvo uniformemente distribuido a través del año, independientemente de la duración de las horas luz; este efecto se mostró en los dos años de estudio. Se concluye que el establecimiento de la pubertad es un fenómeno multifactorial; la estacionalidad afecta a BHM y SE de manera diferenciada y, aparentemente, la SC es un factor importante, probablemente asociado con la eficiencia en la utilización de energía. Este trabajo reitera la importancia de la grasa dorsal y documenta, por primera vez PM/SC y su asociación con el establecimiento de la pubertad.
Palabras clave Pubertad; Superficie corporal; Estacionalidad; Ganado tropical; Leptina
Introduction
Among the most important determinants for the establishment of puberty in heifers for beef production are age1, height and body weight2, with marked differences between breeds. In tropical conditions, production systems with Bos taurus taurus, Bos taurus indicus cattle and their crosses are currently common, and the overall production and productivity of the beef production system depends on the reproductive performance of breeding herds. The prepubertal stage of heifers is a cost factor and age at first calving is an important indicator of the reproductive performance of the herd. Zebu heifers (Bos taurus indicus) require more age and weight to reach puberty than Bos taurus taurus3. This fact has been highlighted as a limiting factor for the reproductive success of Bos taurus indicus breeds4. Age at puberty is closely related to the weight and body composition of animals5.
There are complex interactions between different hormones for the establishment of puberty6 and the importance of leptin is highlighted for its association with fat accumulation, since it participates in the regulation of food intake, and is a good dynamic indicator of body condition and nutritional status in ruminants7. Circulating concentrations of leptin have been reported to increase during pubertal development in heifers8. The available information suggests that there is a critical level of fat required for the start of reproductive activity9 and that there may be differences in this critical fat limit between breeds10, implying that conditions must exist to regulate the accumulation of excess energy in the form of body fat. Although several factors are known to affect the establishment of puberty in heifers, there is little literature on the interactions between these and, particularly, on the differences between B. taurus taurus and B. taurus indicus, especially if it is consider the seasonality factor, which is associated with Zebu cattle3,11,12. Based on the above, the present study aimed to determine the association between some markers of body composition, the internal environment of animals and those of the external environment, with the establishment of puberty in B. taurus taurus and B. taurus indicus heifers, fed individually to have similar weight gains, born in different seasons of the year, with a different body composition, induced during their growth.
Material and methods
Localization
The study was carried out in the Las Margaritas experimental station, dependent on INIFAP, located in Hueytamalco, Puebla, Mexico, at 19º 51’ 03” NL and 97º 12’ 48” WL, at 500 m asl. The climate is semi-warm humid subtropical Af(c), with average annual temperature of 20.8 °C, average annual rainfall of 3,000 mm and relative humidity of 90 %.
Treatments
The study was repeated for two years; in total, 121 heifers from two seasons of birth were used: 24 Braunvieh (BR) and 33 Brahman (BHM) born in spring (May 4 ± 36 d), and 32 BR and 32 BHM born in autumn (October 27 ± 35 d). Half of the heifers of each breed and season-year received one of two treatments: 1) with the β-agonist Zilpaterol hydrochloride (ZIL, Zilpaterol®); 0.15 mg/kg from 220 to 300 kg of body weight and 0.25 mg/kg from 301 kg of body weight until the first ovulation, mixed in the concentrate, and 2) without β-agonist (control). PB for this study was defined as the first ovulation that preceded the first estrous cycle with the formation of a corpus luteum of normal duration (≥ 12 ≤ 17 d), corresponding to a regular estrous cycle (21 ± 4 d)13.
General handling
The heifers entered the study at around seven months of age. They were housed individually in pens of 4 × 6 m, with cement floor, asbestos roof (4 × 3 m), feeder and water trough. For their adaptation to handling and sampling routine, heifers were introduced to pens approximately 30 d before the study, halter broken (2 h/day) and brushed manually. The feed consisted of free access to fresh chopped cane (Saccharum sinense) and commercial concentrate (18 % crude protein and 70 % TDN), in amounts adjusted individually after each weighing of the heifers to obtain similar weight gains between animals. For practical reasons, it was decided to name all females indistinctly “heifers” from the beginning until their exit from the experiment.
Estimation of development parameters and body composition
The animals were weighed every 14 days, after removal of feed and water for 18 h. Every 21 days, the body condition (1 to 9; 1= very thin, 9= obese)14 was recorded, which was rated independently by three people, and the average of these ratings was used as a response variable. Body surface was measured every 48 days, with a counter adapted to a roller instrument to measure the surface of the trunk (odometer); in addition, a tape measure was used to determine the surface of limbs, head, ears and tail. To ensure the reproducibility of the measurements, the odometer was validated by independent measurement of 10 animals, by three people on three occasions in the same day. The intraclass correlation coefficient of the individual measures and the means were 0.96 and 0.98 (P<0.0001), respectively, and a reliability of 0.98 in Cronbach’s Alpha15 was obtained. The area measured with the odometer was established with the circumference of the tires, the distance between them and the number of turns.
To calculate the body surface (BS), the following formula was used: BS= 2 (a + l + m + e) + t + h, where: a= area measured with the odometer, l= leg area, m= forelimb area, e= ear area, t= tail area and h= head area. The general measurements, made with tape measure, were entered into an Excel database and validated in the same way as the odometer, obtaining an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 for the individual measures and the average (P<0.0001). The thickness of the dorsal fat (DF) and the depth of the long dorsal muscle (DM) were measured, obtaining images with an ultrasound (equipped with a 3.5 MHz transducer) on the left side of the back, 12 cm from the midline, at the level of the twelfth rib, after hair removal of the area and application of gel16. The measurements were made every 14 days, coinciding with the weightings of the animals throughout the study. DM measurements correspond only to heifers of the second year of experimentation.
Blood collection and hormone measurement
At the beginning of the study, to confirm the prepubertal state of the heifers by means of serum progesterone, a blood sample was collected from each animal for five consecutive days, by puncture of the jugular vein with needle and vacuum tubes without anticoagulant. Subsequently, samples were collected four times a week until each heifer reached 230 kg of body weight. From that moment, the sampling was daily until the end of the study, which was when the beginning of puberty (PB) was determined, confirmed with the identification of the first ovulation by ultrasound. The samples were processed to obtain serum, which was frozen at -20 °C until the progesterone (P4) concentration was determined by radioimmunoassay (RIA). The P4 concentration was used as confirmation of the prepubertal state (values < 1 ng/ml) of the heifers. Serum leptin concentration (LEP) was assessed with ruminant-specific RIA17. Serum leptin concentrations were quantified from samples taken four times a week from the start of the experiment. Once the beginning of PB was identified, the last 12 samples prior to the first ovulation were selected, from which the average value of the serum leptin concentration at puberty was obtained; the data obtained were only from the heifers of the second year of experimentation.
Ultrasonography of ovarian structures
Once the hand could be inserted through the rectum of the heifers, approximately at 230 kg and 10 mo of age, ultrasonographic images of the ovaries were taken to identify the first ovulation; initially, twice a week and then daily. For this, a Sonovet equipment was used, with a 7.5 MHz rectal transducer and a video recorder. The first ovulation was considered the first day that luteal tissue was detected preceded by the sudden disappearance of the dominant follicle, the foregoing corroborated with serum P4.
Variables
The response variables were the values at PB of: age (APB; days), body weight (WPB; kg), metabolic weight (MW; body weight elevated to the power 0.75; kg), BS (m2), body condition (BC; points), DF (cm), DM (cm), body weight between body surface (WPB/BS; g/cm2), metabolic weight between body surface (MW/BS; g/cm2) and serum leptin concentration (LEP; ng/ml). The variables WPB/BS and MW/BS were generated to know how many grams of metabolically active tissue there were for each square centimeter of skin, which is an organ that participates in the regulation of body temperature and can act as a heat energy diffuser.
Statistical analyses
Data were analyzed by analysis of variance and Pearson’s correlation. The design was a completely randomized one with a 2×2×2 factorial arrangement. The preliminary statistical model included the main effects of breed (BD), season of birth (SB) and treatment (with or without β-agonist), the double and triple interactions between these effects, the body weight of entry to the experiment as a covariate and, as a block, the group of entry to the experiment (animals grouped according to the date and exact year of study) nested in BD x SB. The final statistical model included the main effects and the block. In addition, for APB and BC, the model included body weight at the start of the experiment; the BD x SB interaction was only included in the definitive BC analysis. To analyze LEP, an analysis of covariance of serum leptin concentrations was performed on the days from the start of the study to the start of PB, including the fixed effects of BD, SB and treatment. The differences between means were determined with the PDIFF option, all this with the GLM procedure of SAS18. A homogeneity test was performed with a Chi-square to observe the effect of seasonality at the PB of the heifers, using the categorical variables BD and SB, with respect to the light hours (increasing or decreasing) at PB.
Results
Correlations between variables
Regardless of the breed of heifers, a high correlation between WPB and APB (r= 0.86; P<0.01) was found, as well as between BS and APB (r= 0.84; P<0.01). Likewise, BS was correlated with WPB and MW (r= 0.90; P<0.01). For LEP and WPB, a low correlation was observed (r= 0.28; P<0.01), as well as for LEP and BS (r= 0.37; P<0.01). An intermediate correlation was observed for the variables MW/BS and DF (r= 0.52; P<0.01). The covariate weight of the heifers at the beginning of the experiment was only significant for APB (P<0.01) and BC (P<0.05). An effect of the BD x SB interaction on BC (P<0.05) was found. In addition, there was a linear relationship (P<0.01) of LEP with respect to the days elapsed until PB, with 35 pg/ml more LEP for each day that puberty approached.
Effect of breed on variables related to puberty
At PB, BHM heifers were 74.8 kg heavier than BRs (P<0.0001), an age-related difference, as BHM required 142.6 d more than BRs for PB to occur (P<0. 0001; Table 1). BHM heifers had 0.64 m² (18 %) more BS than BRs (P<0.0001), while the WPB/BS ratio was 6.4 % higher (P<0.001) in BHMs; this difference disappeared when the comparison was made based on MW/BS. BHM heifers showed 0.4 % more (P<0.05) BC than BRs (7.72 vs 7.69 points) at PB. The most obvious difference was in DF, where BHMs showed 64 % more DF at PB than BRs (P<0.0001). Coinciding with the above, BHM heifers had 20 % more (P<0.0001) LEP at PB than BRs.
Table 1 Least squares means and standard errors for puberty response variables, for breed and treatment effects
| Variable1 | Breed | Treatment | Average | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brahman | Braunvieh | Control | Zilpaterol | ||
| WPB, kg | 376.77 ± 7.42a |
301.97 ± 6.59b |
320.47 ± 6.25a |
358.27 ± 6.42b |
339.37 ± 6.78 |
| MW, kg | 85.34 ± 1.29a | 72.32 ± 1.15b | 75.57 ± 1.09a | 82.09 ± 1.12b | 78.83 ± 1.18 |
| APB, days | 588.13 ± 14.71a |
445.51 ± 12.48b |
490.29 ± 11.96a |
543.35 ± 12.42b |
516.82 ± 13.08 |
| BS, m2 | 4.22 ± 0.07a | 3.58 ± 0.06b | 3.79 ± 0.05a | 4.00 ± 0.06b | 3.90 ± 0.06 |
| WPB/BS, g/cm2 |
8.99 ± 0.11a | 8.45 ± 0.10b | 8.48 ± 0.09a | 8.97 ± 0.10b | 8.72 ± 0.10 |
| MW/BS, g/cm2 |
2.05 ± 0.02a | 2.03 ± 0.02a | 2.01 ± 0.02a | 2.07 ± 0.02b | 2.04 ± 0.02 |
| BC, 1 to 9 | 7.72 ± 0.06a | 7.69 ± 0.05b | 7.56 ± 0.05a | 7.86 ± 0.05b | 7.71 ± 0.06 |
| DM, cm* | 5.86 ± 0.10a | 4.69 ± 0.10b | 4.95 ± 0.09a | 5.60 ± 0.09b | 5.28 ± 0.10 |
| DF, cm | 2.39 ± 0.07a | 1.46 ± 0.06b | 1.95 ± 0.06a | 1.91 ± 0.06a | 1.93 ± 0.06 |
| LEP, ng/ml* | 3.30 ± 0.10a | 2.75 ± 0.09b | 2.95 ± 0.09a | 3.09 ± 0.09a | 3.02 ± 0.09 |
1WPB=body weight; MW= metabolic weight; APB= age; BS= body surface; WPB/BS= body weight between body surface; MW/BS= metabolic weight between body surface; BC= body condition; DM= depth of the long dorsal muscle; DF= thickness of dorsal fat; LEP= serum leptin concentration. *Results of the second year.
a,b Means with different literal between columns of each fixed effect in each of the response variables indicate difference (P<0.05).
Effect of treatment on variables related to the beginning of puberty
Treatment with ZIL had a significant (P<0.01) effect on WPB; animals that received ZIL required 37.8 kg more body weight to begin PB. As for APB, they took 53 d longer than the untreated ones (P<0.05); in addition, their BS and WPB/BS were 7.0 (P<0.001) and 6.0 % higher (P<0.05), respectively. The BC and DM at PB of the animals supplemented with ZIL was 4.0 % and 13.1 % higher (P<0.001) than that of those in the control group, respectively. On the contrary, there was no significant (P>0.05) difference between the two groups with respect to DF and LEP.
Effect of the season of birth on variables related to the beginning of puberty
Heifers born in spring had 0.42 cm less DF than heifers born in autumn (P<0.05). For LEP, at PB, 0.46 ng/ml more was found in heifers born in autumn than in those born in spring (P<0.001). BS was higher in those born in spring, while WPB/BS and MW/BS were lower (P<0.05) in heifers born in spring (Table 2).
Table 2 Least squares means and standard errors for puberty response variables, for the season of birth effect
| Variable | Season of birth | |
|---|---|---|
| Spring | Autumn | |
| WPB, kg | 342.49 ± 6.55a | 336.25 ± 7.44a |
| MW, kg | 79.38 ± 1.14a | 78.28 ± 1.29a |
| APB, days | 533.19 ± 12.42a | 500.46 ± 14.51a |
| BS, m2 | 4.04 ± 0.06a | 3.75 ± 0.06b |
| WPB/BS, g/cm2 | 8.46 ± 0.10a | 8.98 ± 0.11b |
| MW/BS, g/cm2 | 1.97 ± 0.02a | 2.10 ± 0.02b |
| BC, 1 to 9 | 7.68 ± 0.09a | 7.73 ± 0.06a |
| DM, cm* | 5.32 ± 0.10a | 5.23 ± 0.10a |
| DF, cm | 1.72 ± 0.06a | 2.14 ± 0.07b |
| LEP, ng/ml* | 2.79 ± 0.10a | 3.25 ± 0.09b |
WPB= body weight; MW= metabolic weight; APB= age; BS= body surface; WPB/BS= body weight between body surface; MW/BS= metabolic weight between body surface; BC= body condition; DM= depth of the long dorsal muscle; DF= thickness of dorsal fat; LEP= serum leptin concentration. *Results of the second year.
a,b Means with different literal between columns of each fixed effect in each of the response variables indicate difference (P<0.05).
Effect of breed x season of birth interaction on body condition
BR heifers born in spring had lower BC than BR heifers born in autumn and BHMs born in spring (P<0.05) but were similar to BHMs born in autumn (Figure 1).
BHM= Brahman, BR= Braunvieh. Different literals (a,b) between means indicate difference (P<0.05).
Figure 1 Least squares means and standard errors for body condition (BC) at puberty, by breed and season of birth
It was observed that 48 of the 65 BHM heifers started PB in the months in which light hours increased (December 22 to June 21) and the other 17 heifers did so in the months in which light hours decreased (June 22 to December 21) (P<0.05). On the contrary, BR heifers began PB regardless of the trend of change of the photoperiod, as 30 of them began PB when light hours increased and another 26 did so when light hours decreased (P>0.05).
Discussion
The present study provides relevant information on the relationships between markers of body composition, the internal environment of animals and those of the external environment with the establishment of puberty in heifers. The relationship of the establishment of PB with body characteristics such as the amount of fat and BS is highlighted; for the latter, the difference shown between breeds (17.8 %) reduced when incorporating WPB/BS (6.4 %) in the analysis, but disappeared when considering MW/BS (<1 %; P>0.05), which suggests that more than BS itself, the important indicator is the relationship of body mass with BS, regardless of breed, despite the clear and significant (P<0.05) differences at PB in the rest of the variables studied between BHM and BR. To a large extent, the differences in several body characteristics between BHM and BR at PB could be associated with the fact that PB in BHM occurred with 4.6 mo more in age, a period in which they continued to grow and modify their body composition, however, there was no difference in the MW/BS ratio at PB, which suggests that this is an important parameter; if it is not a trigger, it is at least indicative that there is an energy balance that allows covering the demand for vital functions, thermoregulation, locomotion, growth, and there is a surplus to be allocated for reproductive processes19.
The treatment with zilpaterol to half of the animals to induce a different body composition between them and those of the control group allowed observing that, despite the differences at PB in terms of the variables weight, age and body characteristics, due to the treatment, DF and LEP did not show differences between the ZIL and control groups, which highlights the importance of body composition and, in particular, the amount of body fat for the establishment of PB.
It has been reported that in the growth and composition of the carcass, there is a large variation between B. taurus taurus20,21 and B. taurus indicus22. Likewise, there are differences in the distribution of body fat between breeds; dairy breeds deposit a higher proportion of their fat internally and a smaller proportion subcutaneously than beef breeds23. These differences, regardless of environmental factors, apparently participate in the maturation processes so that individuals are chronologically different between breeds24, with the consequent variation in age at first calving, which is a variable of economic importance. The estimated age at the PB of Zebu cattle in the tropics and subtropics ranges widely between 16 and 40 mo25 and, consequently, the age at first calving is also very variable due to the effect of environmental variables, with the access of feed to the animals standing out, which in grazing conditions depends on conditions such as rainfall, the quality and fertility of soils and forage species in use, particularly in tropical conditions, so that the study of physiological phenomena, such as the establishment of puberty and seasonal effects on reproductive processes, require the control of variables such as quantity and quality of feeding, which can confuse the results. For that reason, for this work the animals were individually fed so that they all had a similar daily gain. The overall average daily weight gain was 560 ± 121 g/d.
At PB, BHM heifers were heavier and older than BR; in fact, those 142 d of difference implied that BHM had on average 74.8 kg more (in congruence with the average weight gain of the heifers during the study), however, due to the difference in BS, there was no difference in MW/BS between the two breeds. A correlation of 0.96 (P<0.01) between WPB and BS was observed. Other researchers26-28 have reported that B. taurus indicus heifers require greater weight and age to begin PB than B. taurus taurus heifers. In addition, it has been described29 that, in Nelore heifers, a good post-weaning feeding is an effective method to accelerate PB. Among B. taurus indicus breeds, Nelore, which is the one that apparently has fewer flaps and folds of skin and, therefore, less body surface, has had greater popularity in Brazil, apparently, due to its better productive performance, particularly, greater precocity to begin PB29 and lower age at first calving30,31; however, no studies that specifically linked these reproductive characteristics to the BS of animals were found.
The importance of the relationship between body surface and mass in the energy cost of maintenance of animals has been recognized and considered for more than a century; in fact, among the initial studies on basal metabolism, it was discussed that BS was as important or more important than body mass32. In studies conducted with rodents, canines, cattle and humans, it was observed that BS is a variable that allows the most accurate prediction of metabolic rate33. Therefore, it was considered as the variable that allowed, with greater precision, the comparison between animal species of different sizes in quantitative metabolism studies34, which promoted the development of instruments for its measurement35. No studies specifically designed to associate the BS of cattle with some productive characteristics were found; in previous studies36,37, the BS of dairy cows and its relationship with body weight were measured, for the use of a formula based on “Kleiber’s Law” in bioenergetics studies.
It has been estimated that at a higher BS, the loss of body heat by radiation, convection and evaporation38 increases, conditions that imply an energy cost. It has been evaluated that from birth, as the body mass of the animal increases with growth, its relative proportion to body surface also increases, and the relative dissipation of body thermal energy reduces, gradually allowing more energy available for physiological processes and the storage of surpluses. Among those physiological processes not fundamental to sustain the life of the individual is reproduction, which becomes feasible once the energy available in the organism guarantees the processes indispensable for life and other priorities such as locomotion. This requires a balance between the energy that is consumed and processed and that which accumulates in tissues, to then be transformed into work or dissipated into the environment as caloric energy; in the latter function, skin and respiration play a central role in cattle19.
In the case of B. Taurus indicus cattle, their greater adaptation to hot climates, such as tropical ones, is due to their superior ability to regulate body temperature during heat stress conditions, derived from a lower metabolic rate and greater ability to dissipate heat through the skin39. It should be remembered that animals that have a higher proportion of Zebu genes show smaller size of their thoracic and abdominal organs, such as rumen weight and length of intestines than B. taurus taurus animals40,41. It has been observed that the basal metabolic rate in B. taurus indicus x B. taurus taurus is less than in B. taurus taurus. In one study, the rate of heat produced per unit body surface of non-lactating and fasting cows was 57 MCal/m2 for Red Sindhi x Holstein and 100 MCal/m2 for Holstein42.
From a practical point of view, a larger skin surface in Zebu, on the one hand, confers advantages (heat dissipation and resistance to thermal stress), but, apparently, it is associated with lower efficiency in the use of food energy38, growth rate39 and accumulation of energy in the form of body fat43,44, which is an important factor for PB, as reiterated in the results of this work, where, despite the use of zilpaterol, which promoted faster growth, puberty was reached at an older age, with greater weight and musculature in the treated heifers, but with similar DF between controls and treated.
Supplementation with β-agonist ZIL caused APB to increase, and the control heifers to be younger at PB. The administration of ZIL modifies the distribution of nutrients, so that animals grow faster and gain more weight, but this gain is leaner45,46. For the beginning of PB, not only is absolute weight gain of heifers important but also body mass composition47-49, as subtle or acute changes in metabolic state are likely to begin physiological events leading to puberty5,50. Hence, although those treated with ZIL reached with more weight and APB, they were not different from those of the control group in DF, despite the fact that the latter were lighter and with less DM, which was one of the assumptions of the study on the effect of β-agonists in the distribution of nutrients, causing decreased lipogenesis and increased muscle accretion, as observed by several authors, who have reported that ZIL supplementation increased DM and decreased DF in cows51, heifers52 and steers53.
The available information indicates that a minimum of body fat is required to trigger reproductive processes such as PB in heifers9 and a minimum of BC54. In a study55 conducted on Nelore heifers, high correlations (from 0.82 to 0.93) between BC and DF were found, and it was stated that with BC, DF can be predicted in B. taurus indicus cattle at different stages of the production cycle. In a study with B. taurus taurus cows56, it was observed that an increase in BC tended to be accompanied by an increase in the size of adipocytes in subcutaneous adipose tissue. It was observed that B. taurus indicus animals needed more fat accumulation than B. taurus taurus to begin PB, which can be induced by feeding higher energy diets. In this study, in both breeds these relationships were modified by the use of β-agonist ZIL; since the heifers treated were more muscular and had higher BC and more DM at PB, as expected5, but there was no difference with those of the control group in DF at PB.
It is evident that in BHM, above the internal markers related to weight and body composition, a seasonality effect associated with light changes prevailed; therefore, an effect of BD on APB and differences between breeds in the months of occurrence of PB were observed. The seasonality effect was manifested in that BR heifers started PB homogeneously throughout the year, but 73.8 % of BHM heifers started PB in the months when light hours were increasing and only 26.2 % did so when light hours decreased (P<0.05). In fact, the effect of seasonality is manifested on other variables, as shown in Table 2, where the differences in variables that was found as critical for the beginning of PB, such as MW/BS, DF and LEP, remained in animals born in different seasons. The observation of the effect of seasonality on PB in BHM coincides with that described by other authors3, who observed that BHM heifers only started puberty in a period from February to May (days in which light hours increase), unlike Brown Swiss heifers that began puberty throughout the year. This effect was attributed to the susceptibility of BHM heifers to the environmental effects determined by the seasons of the year (seasonality). These observations coincide with results of other studies with Zebu females11,12,57, where a seasonal trend in the postpartum reproductive activity of cows was observed, even under controlled feeding conditions. The photoperiod seems to influence the beginning of puberty. In an experiment with dairy heifers, supplemental lighting (16 h of light/day) during the winter improved growth rates and reduced age to puberty58. Similarly, with B. taurus taurus heifers, supplemental lighting (18 h of light/day), after 22 or 24 wk of age, reduced the age to puberty in heifers born from February to July. These photoperiod effects were accompanied by changes in ovarian development59. The same author60 points out that heifers with a genetic propensity to reach puberty at an early age may be affected by the season of birth differently than those who reach puberty at older ages.
Compared to BR heifers, BHM heifers were more susceptible to environmental signals from the change of light hours, which probably triggered the neuroendocrine processes associated with the beginning of PB, a situation that should be considered in the planning of reproductive management programs for cattle in herds with a diverse breed composition. The effect of the season of birth influenced that heifers born in autumn had higher DF and higher levels of LEP at PB than those born in spring, but there were no differences (P>0.05) in APB between seasons of birth under the conditions of this study.
Interaction of BD x SB on BC was observed at puberty, where BR heifers born in spring showed lower BC than BR heifers born in autumn and BHMs born in spring. Based on general averages (not shown here, they can be consulted in a previous study61), apparently, the heifers of lower APB (BHMs born in spring and BRs born in autumn) reached with greater BC (Figure 1), although the differences in this variable were minimal. In this regard, several authors have suggested that there is a phenomenon of compensation of age with weight for the establishment of PB49,62,63.
It has been reported that in Bos taurus taurus cows56, there is a positive correlation of leptin with body weight and BC; in addition, an increase in BC tended to be accompanied by an increase in the size of adipocytes in subcutaneous adipose tissue. In the present study, LEP at PB was different between breeds; BHM heifers showed higher LEP than BRs. This difference in LEP between breeds may be due to the fact that the BHMs were the ones that also presented the greatest age and amount of DF at PB, since the circulating levels of leptin are directly associated with body adiposity64,65. So far there is no evidence of an abrupt transition in prepubertal plasma concentrations of leptin at puberty or that circulating concentrations may be a critical trigger for PB in fast-growing heifers, but apparently a minimum of circulating leptin is required for PB in heifers with normal or restricted growth rates66.
Conclusions and implications
It is concluded that body mass as a proportion of BS appears to have an important role in the beginning of PB in heifers and that a minimum mass of metabolically active tissues per unit of BS and a minimum of fat accumulation are required for the beginning of PB to be triggered, regardless of the breed in question. The establishment of puberty is a complex phenomenon, which depends on the interaction between variables and internal markers of animals and other factors in their environment, such as changes in light hours, which affect Zebu heifers. The observations derived from this work allow speculating that the late puberty of BHM heifers may be associated with a higher BS compared to BR heifers and confirms the effect of changes in light hours on reproductive phenomena in Zebu females, even when the indirect effect of seasonality is eliminated through controlled feeding. This work documents for the first time the relationship of body mass, as a proportion of body surface, with the establishment of puberty in cattle.
Literatura citada
1. Day ML, Nogueira GP. Management of age at puberty in beef heifers to optimize efficiency of beef production. Anim Front 2013;3:6-11. [ Links ]
2. Manthey AK, Anderson JL, Perry GA, Keisler DH. Feeding distillers dried grains in replacement of forage in limit-fed dairy heifer rations: Effects on metabolic profile and onset of puberty. J Dairy Sci 2017;100:1-12. [ Links ]
3. Calderón RRC, Villa-Godoy A, Lagunes LJ. Determinación ultrasonográfica de la primera ovulación: asociación con la primera ovulación de ciclos estrales regulares en vaquillas Cebú y Suizo Pardo mantenidas en el trópico. Téc Pecu Méx 1996;34(2):79-88. [ Links ]
4. Moriel P, Piccolo M, Lancaster PA, Lamb GC, Vendramini J, Arthington JD. Effects of post-weaning plane of nutrition and estrus synchronization on reproductive performance of influenced beef heifers. J Anim Sci 2017;95(4):3523-3531. [ Links ]
5. Hall JB, Staigmiller RB, Bellows RA, Short RE, Moseley WM, Bellows SE. Body composition and metabolic profiles associated with puberty in beef heifers. J Anim Sci 1995;73(11):3409-3420. [ Links ]
6. Gonzalez-Padilla E, Wiltbank JN, Niswender GD. Puberty in beef heifers. I. The interrelationship between pituitary, hypothalamic and ovarian hormones. J Anim Sci 1975;40(6):1091-1104. [ Links ]
7. Foote AP, Tait RG, Keisler DH, Hales KE, Freetly HC. Leptin concentrations in finishing beef steers and heifers and their association with dry matter intake, average daily gain, feed efficiency, and body composition. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2016;55:136-141. [ Links ]
8. Garcia MR, Amstalden M, Williams SW, Stanko RL, Morrison CD, Keisler DH et al. Serum leptin and its adipose gene expression during pubertal development, the estrous cycle, and different seasons in cattle. J Anim Sci 2002;80(8):2158-2167. [ Links ]
9. Pardo AM, Villareal EL, Papaleo MJ, Melucci OG, Santamaría S, Ferrario J et al. Sexual precocity and productivity of beef cattle female under grazing conditions. Anim Prod Sci 2018;59:757-766. [ Links ]
10. Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Corbet NJ, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG, Williams PJ et al. Genetics of heifer puberty in two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia and associations with heifer- and steer-production traits. Anim Prod Sci 2009;49:399-412. [ Links ]
11. Lozano DRR, Asprón PMA, González-Padilla E, Vásquez PCG. Estacionalidad reproductiva en vacas Bos indicus en el trópico mexicano. Téc Pecu Méx 1987;2(25):192-205. [ Links ]
12. Villagómez AME, Castillo RH, Villa-Godoy A, Román PH, Vázquez PC. Influencia estacional sobre el ciclo estral y el estro en hembras cebú mantenidas en clima tropical. Téc Pecu Méx 2000;38(2):89-103. [ Links ]
13. Evans ACO, Adams GP, Rawlings NC. Endocrine and ovarian follicular changes leading up to the first ovulation in prepuberal heifers. J Reprod Fertil 1994;100:187-194. [ Links ]
14. Richards MW, Spitzer JC, Warner MB. Effect of varying levels of postpartum nutrition and body condition at calving on subsequent reproductive performance in beef cattle. J Anim Sci 1986;62:300-306. [ Links ]
15. SPSS Inc. PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc. 2009. [ Links ]
16. Perkins TL, Green RD, Hamlin KE. Evaluation of ultrasonic estimates of carcass fat thickness and longissimus muscle area in beef cattle. J Anim Sci 1992;70:1002-1010. [ Links ]
17. Delavaud C, Bocquier F, Chilliard Y, Keisler DH, Gertler A, Kann G. Plasma leptin determination in ruminants: Effect of nutritional status and body fatness on plasma leptin concentration assessed by a specific RIA in sheep. J Endocrinol 2000;165:519-526. [ Links ]
18. SAS. Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA. 2002. [ Links ]
19. Foster DL, Hileman SM. Puberty in sheep. Knobil and Neill´s Physiology of Reproduction. Fourth ed. 2015;1441-1485. [ Links ]
20. Alberti P, Panea B, Sanudo C, Olleta JL, Rpoll G, Ertbjerg P et al. Live weight, body size and carcass characteristics of young bulls of fifteen European breeds. Livest Sci 2008;114:19-30. [ Links ]
21. Clarke AM, Drennan MJ, McGee M, Kenedy DA, Evans RD, Berry DP. Intake, live animal scores/measurements and carcass composition and value of late-maturing beef and dairy breeds. Livest Sci 2009;126:57-68. [ Links ]
22. Thrift FA, Sanders JO, Brown AH, Herring AD, Riley DG, DeRouen SM. Preweaning, postweaning, and carcass trait comparisons for progeny sired by subtropically adapted beef sire breeds at various US locations. The Prof Anim Scientist 2010;26(5):451-473. [ Links ]
23. McGee M, Keane MG, Neilan R, Moloney AP, Caffrey PJ. Production and carcass traits of high dairy genetic merit Holstein, standard dairy genetic merit Friesian and Charolais x Holstein-Friesian male cattle. Irish J Agr Food Res 2005;44:215-231. [ Links ]
24. Black JL. Animal growth and its regulation. J Anim Sci 1988;66:1-22. [ Links ]
25. Nogueira GP. Puberty in South American Bos indicus (Zebu) cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 2004;82-83:361-372. [ Links ]
26. Reynolds WL, de Rouen TM, High Jr JW. The age and weight at puberty of Angus, Brahman and zebu cross heifers [abstract]. J Anim Sci 1963;22:243. [ Links ]
27. Calderón RRC. Cambios dinámicos de las estructuras ováricas y su relación con la progesterona sérica en becerras peripúberes Bos taurus y Bos indicus, mantenidas en clima tropical [tesis maestría]. México, DF: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 1994. [ Links ]
28. Pereira GR, Barcellos JOJ, Sessim AG, Tarouco JU, Feijó FD, Neto JB et al. Relationship of post-weaning growth and age at puberty in crossbred beef heifers. Rev Bras Zootec 2017;46(5):413-420. [ Links ]
29. Nepomuceno DD, Pires AV, Ferraz MVC, Biehl MV, Gonçalves JRS, Moreira EM et al. Effect of pre-partum dam supplementation, creep-feeding and post-weaning feedlot on age at puberty in Nellore heifers. Livest Sci 2017;195:58-62. [ Links ]
30. Eler JP, Silva JVA, Ferraz JBS, Dias F, Oliveira NH, Evans JL et al. Genetic evaluation of the probability of pregnancy at 14 months for Nellore heifers. J Anim Sci 2002;80:951-954. [ Links ]
31. Nogueira GP, de Lucia RFS, Pereira FV, Cirilo PD. Precocious fertility in Nelore heifers [abstract]. Biol Reprod 2003;68(Suppl 1):382. [ Links ]
32. Richet C. La Chaleur Animale. Paris, 1889. [ Links ]
33. Kleiber M. Body size and metabolism. Hilgardia 1932;6:315-353. [ Links ]
34. Kleiber M. Body size and metabolic rate. Physiol Rev 1947;4(27): 511-541. [ Links ]
35. Mitchell HH. The effect of the amount of feed consumed by cattle on the utilization of its energy content. J Agric Res 1932;3(45):163-191. [ Links ]
36. Hogan AG, Skouby CI. Determination of the surface area of cattle and swine. J Agric Res 1923;19(25):419-430. [ Links ]
37. Elting ECA. Formula for estimating surface area of dairy cattle. J Agric Res 1926;33(3):269-280. [ Links ]
38. Berman A. Effects of body surface area estimates on predicted energy requirements and heat stress. J Dairy Sci 2003;86(11):3605-3610. [ Links ]
39. Hansen P. Physiological and cellular adaptations of zebu cattle to thermal stress. Anim Reprod Sci 2004;82-83:349-360. [ Links ]
40. Swett WW, Matthews CA, McDowell RE. 1961. Sindhi-Jersey and Sindhi-Holstein crosses: their external form and internal anatomy compared with those of purebred Jerseys and Holsteins. Tech Bull 1961. USDA 1236. [ Links ]
41. McDowell RE, Wilk JC, Talbott CW. Economic viability of crosses of Bos taurus and Bos indicus for dairying in warm climates. J Dairy Sci 1996;79(7):1292-1303. [ Links ]
42. Johnston JE, Hamblin FB, Schrader GT. Factors concerned in the comparative heat tolerance of Jersey, Holstein, and Red Sindhi-Holstein (F1) cattle. J Anim Sci 1958;17:473-479. [ Links ]
43. Bucholtz DC, Manning J, Herbosa CG, Schillo KK, Foster DL. The energetics of LH secretion: a temporally-focused view of sexual maturation [abstract]. In: Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Washington, D.C. 1993;23:349. [ Links ]
44. Frisch RE. Body weight, body fat and ovulation. Trends Endocrinol Metab 1991;2:191-197. [ Links ]
45. Moloney AP, Beermann DH. Mechanisms by wich β-adrenergic agonists alter growth and body composition in ruminants. In: Enne G, et al, editors Residues of veterinary drugs and mycotoxins in animal products. Pers, Wageningen 1996;124-136. [ Links ]
46. Cônsolo NRB, Rodriguez FD, Goulart RS, Frasseto MO, Ferrari VB, Silva LFP. Zilpaterol hydrochloride improves feed efficiency and changes body composition in nonimplanted Nellore heifers. J Anim Sci 2015;93(10):4948-4955. [ Links ]
47. Maciel MN, Zieba DA, Amstalden M, Keisler DH, Neves J, Williams GL. Recombinant leptin prevents fasting-mediated reductions in pulsatile LH release and stimulates GH secretion in peripubertal heifers [abstract]. Proc Mid West Sect Am Soc Anim Sci 2003;66:263. [ Links ]
48. Arije GF, Wiltbank JN. Age and weight at puberty in Hereford heifers. J Anim Sci 1971;33:401-406. [ Links ]
49. González-Padilla E, Ruíz DR, Wiltbank JN. Inducción y sincronización del estro en vaquillas prepúberes mediante la administración de estrógenos y un progestágeno. Téc Pecu Méx 1975;(1):17-23. [ Links ]
50. Steiner RA, Cameron JL, McNeill TH, Clifton DK, Bremner WJ. Metabolic signals for the onset of puberty. In: Norman RL, editor. Neuroendocrine aspects of reproduction. Academic Press, New York 1983. [ Links ]
51. Lowe BK, Mckeith RO, Segers JR, Safko JA, Froetschel MA, Stewart Jr RL et al. The effects of zilpaterol hydrochloride supplementation on market dairy cow performance, carcass characteristics, and cutability. Prof Anim Scient 2012;28(2):150-157. [ Links ]
52. Rathmann RJ, Bernhard BC, Swingle RS, Lawrence TE, Nichols WT, Yates DA. Effects of zilpaterol hydrochloride and days on the finishing diet on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and tenderness in beef heifers. J Anim Sci 2012;90:3301-3311. [ Links ]
53. Kononoff PJ, Defoor PJ, Engler MJ, Swingle RS, James ST, Deobald HM et al. Impact of a leptin single nucleotide polymorphism and zilpaterol hydrochloride on growth and carcass characteristics in finishing steers. J Anim Sci 2013;91(10):5011-5017. [ Links ]
54. Perry GA. Physiology and endocrinology symposium: harnessing basic knowledge of factors controlling puberty to improve synchronization of estrus and fertility in heifers. J Anim Sci 2012;90(4):1172-1182. [ Links ]
55. Ayres H, Ferreira RM, de Souza Torres-Júnior JR, Demétrio CGB, de Lima CG, Baruselli PS. Validation of body condition score as a predictor of subcutaneous fat in Nelore (Bos indicus) cows. Livest Sci 2009;123(2-3):175-179. [ Links ]
56. Locher L, Häussler S, Laubenthal L, Singh SP, Winkler J, Kinoshita A et al. Effect of increasing body condition on key regulators of fat metabolism in subcutaneous adipose tissue depot and circulation of nonlactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2015;98(2):1057-1068. [ Links ]
57. Plasse D, Warnick AC, Koger M. Reproductive behavior of Bos indicus females in a subtropical environment. I. Puberty and ovulation frequency in Brahman and Brahman x British heifers. J Anim Sci 1968;27:94-100. [ Links ]
58. Peters RR, Chapin LT, Leining KB, Tucker HA. Supplemental lighting stimulates growth and lactation in cattle. Science 1976;199:911-912. [ Links ]
59. Hansen PJ, Kamwanja LA, Hauser ER. Photoperiod influences age at puberty of heifers. J Anim Sci 1983;57:985-992. [ Links ]
60. Hansen PJ. Seasonal modulation of puberty and the postpartum anestrus in cattle: A review. Livest Prod Sci 1985;12:309-327. [ Links ]
61. Hernández LC. Interacciones entre estacionalidad, características corporales y leptina en el establecimiento de la pubertad en vaquillas Bos taurus taurus y Bos taurus indicus [tesis maestría]. México, CDMX: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2018. [ Links ]
62. Greer RC, Whitman RW, Staigmiller RB, Anderson DC. Estimating the impact of management decisions on the occurrence of puberty in beef heifers. J Anim Sci 1983;56(1):30-39. [ Links ]
63. Ferreira VCP, Penna VM, Bergmann JAG, Torres RA. Interação genótipo-ambiente em algumas características produtivas de gado de corte no Brasil. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2001;53:385-392. [ Links ]
64. Ehrhardt R. Development of a specific radioimmunoassay to measure physiological changes of circulating leptin in cattle and sheep. J Endocrinol ogy 2000;166(3):519-528. [ Links ]
65. Geary TW, McFadin EL, MacNeil MD, Grings EE, Short RE, Keisler DH. Leptin as a predictor of carcass composition in beef cattle. J Anim Sci 2003;81(1):1-8. [ Links ]
66. Chelikani PK, Ambrose DJ, Keisler DH, Kennelly JJ. Effects of dietary energy and protein density on plasma concentrations of leptin and metabolic hormones in dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci 2009;92(4):1430-1441. [ Links ]
Received: September 04, 2020; Accepted: September 03, 2021
Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia
Creative Commons
