SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8El estatus fonológico de ND y NT en el amuzgo de San Pedro AmuzgosLa complejidad de la epéntesis vocálica en mazahua índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México

versión On-line ISSN 2007-736X

Resumen

UCHIHARA, Hiroto. Clusters vs. units in Otomanguean: the cases of Tlapanec (Mè’phàà) and Zapotec (Dixsa:). Cuad. Lingüíst. Col. Méx. [online]. 2021, vol.8, e224.  Epub 06-Dic-2021. ISSN 2007-736X.  https://doi.org/10.24201/clecm.v8i0.224.

Since the pioneering work of Trubetzkoy (1939), there have been various proposals as to how to distinguish consonant clusters and units in individual languages. In this paper, I will look at the cases of Malinaltepec Tlapanec (Mè’phàà) and Teotitlán del Valle Zapotec (Dixsa:), two Otomanguean languages. I will look at general and language-particular criteria to distinguish clusters and units in these languages. I will show that in both cases the criteria do not always converge: some sequences are judged to be clusters by certain criteria but as units by others. Based on these observations, and drawing insights from Canonical Typology (Brown et al. 2012), I argue that the distinction between clusters and units is not dichotomous, but multidimensional: individual cases may simultaneously resemble clusters in some aspects but units in others, thus the typology of behaviors is richer than a simple binary opposition.

Palabras llave : complex segments; Canonical Typology; Tlapanec; Zapotec.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )