SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número98Impacto socioeconómico por lahares y caída de ceniza ante la erupción del volcán Cayambe en la actividad florícola en Cayambe y Pedro MoncayoAlternativa para determinação de altitudes normais-ortométricas na Amazônia Legal Brasileira índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista cartográfica

versión On-line ISSN 2663-3981versión impresa ISSN 0080-2085

Resumen

ARIZA, Alexander; SALAS REY, Javier  y  MERINO DE MIGUEL, Silvia. Comparison of maximum likelihood estimators and regression models for burn severity mapping in Mediterranean forests using Landsat TM and ETM+ data. Rev. cartogr. [online]. 2019, n.98, pp.145-177.  Epub 14-Mar-2022. ISSN 2663-3981.  https://doi.org/10.35424/rcarto.i98.145.

During the last decade, there has been a growing number of published works about burn severity of forest fires using remote sensing data for both natural resources management and research purposes. Many of these studies quantify changes between pre- and post-fire vegetation conditions from satellite images using spectral indices; however, there is an active discussion about which of the most commonly used indices is more suitable to estimate burn severity, and which methodology is the best for the estimation of severity levels. This study proposes and evaluates a Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) Automatic Learning Algorithm for mapping burn severity as an alternative to regression models. We developed both these methods using GeoCBI (Geometrically structured Composite Burn Index) field data, and six different spectral indices (derived from Landsat TM and ETM+ images) for two forest fires in central Spain. We compared the capability to discriminate burn severity of these indices through a spectral separability index (M), and evaluated their concordance with GeoCBI-based field data using the coefficient of determination (R2). Afterwards, the selected index was used for the regression and MLE models for estimating burn severity levels (unburned, low, moderate, and high), and validated with field data. The RBR index showed a better spectral separability (average between two fires M= 2.00) than dNBR (M= 1.82) and RdNBR (M= 1.80). Additionally, GeoCBI had a higher adjustment with RBR (R2= 0.73) than with RdNBR (R2= 0.72) and dNBR (R2= 0.71). Finally, MLE showed the highest overall classification accuracy (Kappa= 0.65), and the best accuracy for each individual class.

Palabras llave : Regression models; Maximum likelihood; GeoCBI; dNBR; RdNBR; RBR.

        · resumen en Español | Portugués     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )