SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número65Una ética de lo contingente: Judith Butler y el principio de la (no) violenciaEl círculo hermenéutico de la praxis en Ricœur índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Tópicos (México)

versión impresa ISSN 0188-6649

Resumen

NEIRA, Hernán. The Killing of Oneself in the Dispute for Sovereignty. Tópicos (México) [online]. 2023, n.65, pp.133-161.  Epub 09-Jun-2023. ISSN 0188-6649.  https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v650.2092.

Killing oneself or assuming the risk of death in the name of an ethical-political aim, avoiding the infliction of moral or physical wounds on others, has been a recurrent fact throughout history. The instability of the individual resulting from such actions can submit the state or other power to a stupefaction that weakens the exercise of its will. Self-sacrifice of this kind does not always seek to create a counter-power. Indeed, its effectiveness may come from the fact that it does not attempt to create a counter-power and generates a situation that is not the opposite of the previous one, but rather different, with its results getting closer to those desired. Some political self-sacrifices are more appropriate to displace the relationship with the state than to confront it. In the context of threatened state sovereignty, I analyze who is at the heart of political-ethical self-sacrifice, the meaningful nature of the act, some of the individualistic prejudices that obscure its interpretation, and its relationship to other forms of killing oneself.

Palabras llave : ethical-political suicide; hunger strike; state sovereignty; civil disobedience; Thoreau; Gandhi.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )