SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.50 número148Fake Barns and Our Epistemological TheorizingModerate Epistemic Akrasia índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Crítica (México, D.F.)

versão impressa ISSN 0011-1503

Resumo

MORO, Rodrigo; AUDAY, Marcelo  e  TOHME, Fernando. On Rationality in the Traveler’s Dilemma. Crítica (Méx., D.F.) [online]. 2018, vol.50, n.148, pp.55-68.  Epub 31-Mar-2020. ISSN 0011-1503.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2018.03.

Kaushik Basu presents the Traveler’s Dilemma (TD) as a challenge to Game Theory. This challenge has been experimentally investigated. When faced with Basu’s version of the TD, participants (including experts in game theory) behave in the way Basu suggests. However, a little change in the game turns out to reverse participants’ choices. The question is, then, whether it is possible to provide an account of the main empirical findings as consequences of rational choices (i.e., to rationalize them). There are several proposals in the literature but none of them provides a satisfactory account for why experts in game theory playing against each other usually reject the only undominated option of the TD. The goal of this article is to suggest an alternative proposal that fixes this problem.

Palavras-chave : game theory; experiments; experts’ choices; rationalization; domination.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )