SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.55 número163Against magnitude realismThe philosophical significance of the representational theory of measurement -RTM as semantic foundations índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Crítica (México, D.F.)

versão impressa ISSN 0011-1503

Resumo

PERRY, Zee R.. Explanatory problems for mass additivity and dynamics. Crítica (Méx., D.F.) [online]. 2023, vol.55, n.163, pp.45-80.  Epub 04-Jun-2024. ISSN 0011-1503.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2023.1408.

I present an argument against the view that the additivity of mass (i.e., the property according to which a composite object’s mass is the “sum” of its parts’) is metaphysically independent of dynamical laws governing massive bodies. In particular, taking additivity to be independent of dynamics commits you to widespread unexplained correlations between the mass properties of composites and the dynamic behavior of massive bodies. The second half of the paper extends this explanatory worry, showing that the very same considerations apply to aspects of mass’s quantitative structure. This gives rise to a new and powerful objection to certain influential theories about the fundamental structure of physical quantities -most notably the magnitude realism of Peacocke (2019) and the second-order absolutist accounts defended by Mundy (1987) and Eddon (2013b).

Palavras-chave : quantities; metaphysics; mereology; center of mass; metaphysical explanation.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês