SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.45 número133Argumentación jurídica, por qué y para quéMéxico como nación pluricultural: Una propuesta de articulación sociojurídica en el siglo XXI índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Boletín mexicano de derecho comparado

versão On-line ISSN 2448-4873versão impressa ISSN 0041-8633

Resumo

SOUSA, Felipe Oliveira de. The Objectivity of Beliefs, Reasonable Disagreement and Political Deliberation. Bol. Mex. Der. Comp. [online]. 2012, vol.45, n.133, pp.193-214. ISSN 2448-4873.

This paper is part of a broader argument that seeks to offer a justification for political (and law's) authority. The aims here are two-fold: to investigate the role of truth in political argument and to place the problem of reasonable disagreement. More precisely, the argument focuses on the possibility of political deliberation. Political deliberation figures as a preliminary stage of political decision-making. It has to do with a confrontation between various incompatible substantive beliefs which, in despite ofthis, seem to be all reasonable. How can citizens holding incompatible beliefs engage in a common enterprise of justifying them to one another? That is the main question.

Palavras-chave : beliefs; objectivity; reasonable disagreement; political deliberation.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons