SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.63 número3La relación entre el Reino de Marruecos y el Estado de Israel: una cooperación geopolítica pragmática de larga trayectoria índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Foro internacional

versão impressa ISSN 0185-013X

Resumo

BECK, Humberto. Democracy without shortcuts: a conversation with Cristina Lafont. Foro int [online]. 2023, vol.63, n.3, pp.539-560.  Epub 08-Set-2023. ISSN 0185-013X.  https://doi.org/10.24201/fi.v63i3.3005.

In this conversation with Humberto Beck, professor at El Colegio de México, political philosopher Cristina Lafont, author of Democracy without Shortcuts: A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy (Spain, Trotta, 2021), defends democracy as a form of self-government that materializes when all citizens have the possibility to form an informed opinion on fundamental collective issues, influence political decisions that affect their lives, and challenge those that violate their rights, even when they may enjoy majority support. A disciple of Jürgen Habermas and a professor in the Philosophy Department at Northwestern University, Lafont examines the weaknesses of political proposals, both populist and technocratic, that present themselves as “shortcuts” to democracy. In contrast, she puts forward a vision based on the participatory exercise of deliberative democracy. In this conception, democratic legitimacy does not arise spontaneously from the arithmetic of votes or from an informed minority making the right decisions, but from debate in a public sphere where citizens, in full exercise of their freedoms, present their positions, try to persuade each other, and assume the obligation to justify to their fellow citizens those decisions that will equally bind them. Without ignoring the problems of contemporary democracies, Lafont vindicates the value of institutions like elections, political parties, and the judicial review of decisions made by majority powers, while also discussing the flaws of new, seemingly democratic proposals that invoke citizen deliberation but restrict their participation. Ultimately, she concludes, all these shortcuts are mirages. To preserve democracy and improve life in common, there is no substitute for the arduous political work of convincing and reasoning among equals.

Palavras-chave : deliberative democracy; citizen participation; public opinion; minority rights; judicial review; democracy; populism; technocracy; lotocracy.

        · resumo em Espanhol | Francês     · texto em Espanhol