Articles
Time Evolution of the 3-Tangle of a System of 3-Qubit Interacting
through a XY Hamiltonian
Manuel Ávila Aoki1
*
Carlos Gerardo Honorato1
Jose Eladio Hernández Vázquez1
1 Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México,
Centro Universitario Valle de Chalco, Mexico. vlkmanuel@uaemex.mx,
carlosg.honorato@correo.buap.mx, eladiohv2122@gmail.com
Abstract:
We consider a pure 3-qubits system interacting through a XY-Hamiltonian with
antiferromagnetic constant J. We employ the 3-tangle as an
efficient measure of the entanglement between such a 3-qubit system. The time
evolution of such a 3-tangle is studied. In order to do the above, the 3-tangle
associated to the pure 3-qubit state |ψt=c0t|000+c1t|001+c2t|010+c3t|011+c4t|100+c5t|101+c6t|110+c7t|111 is calculated as a function of the initial coefficients cit=0 i=0,1,…,7, the time t and the antiferromagnetic constant
J. We find that the 3-tangle of the 3-qubit system is
periodic with period t=4π/J. Furthermore, we also find that the 3-tangle as a function of the
time t and J has maximal and minimum values.
The maximal values of the 3-tangle can be employed in Quantum Information
Protocols (QIP) that use entanglement as a basic resource. The pattern found for
the 3-tangle of the system of three qubits interacting through a XY Hamiltonian
as a function of J and the time t resembles to
a quantized physical quantity.
Keywords: 3-qubits; non-classical communications; quantum information processing; entanglement
1 Introduction
Entanglement of multipartite pure states has been object of many studies both
theoretical and experimental [1,3]. The reason for the above is that multipartite
entanglement is a basic ingredient for Quantum Information Protocols (QIP). Although
certainly there have been advances in the study of multipartite entanglement
[4,11], it is not yet
understood the time evolution of the initial entanglement of a system of several
qubits. In particular, it arises the question about the characteristics of the time
evolution of the 3-tangle of a system of 3-qubit interacting mutually through a XY
Hamiltonian.
As it has been pointed out in Ref. [4] the 3-tangle can be an important quantity
for measuring the entanglement of a 3-qubit system. In the present paper we study
the time evolution of the 3-tangle associated to a 3-qubit system in a pure state.
In order to do the above we employ the 3-tangle introduced in Ref. [4] and also the quantum
Heisenberg XY-Hamiltonian [12] for a system of 3-qubit.
Thus, given an initial 3-qubit state |ψt=0=c0t=0|000+c1t=0|001+c2t=0|010+c3t=0|011+c4t=0|100+c5t=0|101+c6t=0|110+c7t=0|111, the time evolution of such a state is given by the Heisenberg operator
i.e. |ψt=e-iHt|ψt=0=c0t|000+c1t|001+c2t|010+c3t|011+c4t|100+c5t|101+c6t|110+c7t|111 where H is the XY-Hamiltonian of the 3-qubit system. In
our approach, we derive an analytic expression for the Heisenberg operator e-iHt with which if the initial 3-tangle (𝒯(t = 0)) is known
in terms of the initial coefficients cit=0 i=0,1,…,7 then the final tangle 𝒯(t) will be known in terms of
the final coefficients cit i=0,1,…,7, the value of J and the time t.
As a result we find noticeable harmonic-like time behavior for the 3-tangle. The
later seemingly suggests that the entanglement of a 3-qubit system interacting
through a XY Hamiltonian is a quantized quantity. The paper is organized as follows:
in Section 2 we derive the formalism for a 3-qubit system interacting through a
XY-Hamiltonian. In Section 3 we find an expression for the 3-tangle as a function of
time. Finally, we conclude the work by giving a discussion of our results in a
section of Conclusions.
2 3-qubits XY Hamiltonian
In order to facilitate our calculations it is employed the decimal notation, which is
defined as follows:
|0=|000,
|1=|001,
|2=|010,
|3=|011,
(1)
|4=|100,
|5=|101,
|6=|110,
|7=|111,
Then, a general pure 3-qubits state can be defined in terms of a superposition of the
above basis as follows:
ψ=∑i=07cii,
(2)
where:
∑i=07ci2=1.
(3)
With the decimal notation it is possible to associate a matrix with a Hamiltonian
operator. The respective associated matrix elements to the Hamiltonian operator
H become:
Hij=iHj.
(4)
The so called XY-Hamiltonian for n qubits is: [12]
H=j∑i=0N-1SixSi+1x+SiySi+1y,
(5)
where N = 2n, J is the coupling
constant, and Sia is the a (a = x, y)
component of the spin of the i - th qubit. In the
present case we have n = 3 qubits (i.e. N =
8).
Let us observe that the states |0 and |7 are annihilated by the action of the operator H of Eq.
(5), that is:
H0=0,H7=0.
(6)
Furthermore, the action of the XY Hamiltonian H of Eq. (5) on the
rest of the decimal states is:
H1=J22+4,H2=J21+4,H3=J25+6,H4=J22+1,H5=J26+3,H6=J25+3.
(7)
Through the use of the Eqs. (4)-(7) and the orthonormality of the decimal basis, the
construction of the matrix associated to H yields:
H=J20000001001000000011000010001000000001000100001100000001001000000.
(8)
On the other hand, the time evolution operator can be expanded in powers of
H as follows:
Ut=exp-iHt=1-iHt+-i22Ht2+-i33!Ht3.
(9)
We observe that the several different powers of H of Eq. (8) behave
peculiarly. For instance the quadratic power is:
H2=J240000021001200002011000010001000000001000100001102000021001200000=J2420000010000100001000000000000000000001000000000001000010000100000+0000001001000000011000010001000000001000100001100000001001000000≡J222I2-7+J2H.
In a similar way, for the other powers we obtain that:
H3=J232I2-7+J223H,H4=J242*3I2-7+J233+2H,H5=J252*5I2-7+J245+6H,H6=J262*11I2-7+J2511+10H,
(10)
ewhere I2-7 has been defined in Eq. (11). In general for the n -
th power we find that:
Hn=J2nanI2-7+J2n-1bnH.
(11)
However, we can see that an=2bn-1 and bn=bn-1+an-1=bn-1+2bn-2, then the above equation can be expressed as:
Hn=J2n23--1n-1+2n-1I2-7+J2n-1--1n+2n3H, n≥1.
(12)
We observe from the above equation that for n = 0, the second term
will be equal to zero and that the first one is equal to 1. However, in this case, H0=I2-7 and this is not the identity I8 as can be
seen from Eq. (11). Such a problem can be solved as follows:
Hn=I1,8δ0n+J2n23--1n-1+2n-1I2-7+J2n-1--1n+2n3H, n≥0.
(13)
where:
I1,8≡1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001.
(14)
From the above equation we find that the time evolution operator will always be
linear on H, and the time evolution operator can be written as:
Ut=∑n=0-iHtnn!=∑n=0-itnn!I1,8δ0n+J2n23--1n-1+2n-1I2-7+j2n-1--1n+2n3H=I1,8+2I2-73∑n=01n!-itJ2n--1n-1+2n-1+2H3J∑n=01n!-itJ2n--1n+2n.
(15)
It is worth to observe that the last expression can be written in terms of
exponentials with which the time evolution operator takes a simple form:
Ut=I1,8+2I2-73eiJt2+12e-iJt+2H3Je-iJt-eiJt2.
(16)
Let us note that according to Eqs. (9) and (10) the time evolution of the state |ψt=0 is given by:
ψt=Uψt=0=Uc0t=00+c1t=01+c2t=02+c3t=03+c4t=04+c5t=05+c6t=06+c7t=07=c0t0+c1t1+c2t2+c3t3+c4t4+c5t5+c6t6+c7t7.
(17)
It can be observed from the above equation that we can calculate the coefficients at
any time cjtj=0,1,…,7 if the initial coefficients cjt=0j=0,1,…,7 are known and if it is also known the action of the time evolution
operator on each of the decimal states, that is, Ut|i for i = 0, ...,7. Through the use of Eqs. (6), (7),
(11), (16), and (18) it is found that:
Ut0=0,
(18)
Ut1=23eiJt2+12e-iJt1
(19)
+13e-iJt-eiJt22+4,
Ut2=23eiJt2+12e-iJt2
(20)
+13e-iJt-eiJt21+4,
Ut3=23eiJt2+12e-iJt3
(21)
+13e-iJt-eiJt25+6,
Ut4=23eiJt2+12e-iJt4
(22)
+13e-iJt-eiJt22+1,
Ut5=23eiJt2+12e-iJt5
(23)
+13e-iJt-eiJt26+3,
Ut6=23eiJt2+12e-iJt6
(24)
+13e-iJt-eiJt25+3,
Ut7=7.
(25)
To substitute Eqs. (20)-(27) into Eq. (19), we find the coefficients at any time cjtj=0,1,…,7 in terms of both the above exponentials and the initial coefficients cjt=0j=0,1,…,7 where ∑j=07cjt=02=1.
3 3-tangle as a Measure of Multipartite Entanglement of a 3-qubit System
The measure of entanglement for a 3-qubit system can be is obtained through the
3-tangle which is defined as [4]
T3=4d1-2d2+4d3,
(26)
with:
d1=c02c72+c12c62+c22c52+c42c32,
(27)
d2=c0c7c3c4+c0c7c5c2+c0c7c6c1+c3c4c5c2+c3c4c6c1+c5c2c6c1,
(28)
d3=c7c6c5c3+c7c1c2c4,
(29)
where c
i
represents the coefficient of basic state |i. Thus, by calculating the coefficients
ci (i = 0, 1,
... , 7) as a function of time, in the way it was explained at the end of the above
section, we shall be able of finding the 3-tangle of Eq. (28) as a function of time.
That is to find T3t=4d1t-2d2t+4d3t providing the coefficients
ci (t) are known.
It is worth to observe from Eqs. (18) and (19) that the coefficients
ci (t)
(i = 0,1,..., 7) will depend on the initial coefficients
cj (t = 0)
(j = 0,1,7), the antiferromagnetic constant J
and the time t. By the way, in the present work the initial
coefficients cj (t=0) ∑j=07cj2=1 are found in a random way with which the coefficients
ci (t)
(i = 0,1, ...,7) at time t will result a two
variables function namely J and t.
Before of considering a general state we are focusing on the so called
W and GHZ states which are defined as:
W=134+2+1,
(30)
GHZ=120+7.
(31)
The respective initial 3-tangle for the GHZ-state is unit while for the W-state the
initial 3-tangle is zero. Now, the W-state time evolution is only over the phase.
Therefore the 3-tangle of the W-state does not change in time. Thus, the XY
Hamiltonian keeps constant the entanglement of the W-state which is an important
result. On the other hand, the GHZ-state also is not modified by the time evolution
operator of Eq. (19) hence its associated 3-tangle keeps constant in time. We
conclude that the XY Hamiltonian assures that the entanglement of the GHZ-state does
not change in time.
Let us now consider an arbitrary initial 3-qubit state at t = 0
denoted by |ψt=0=c0t=0|000+c1t=0|001+c2t=0|010+c3t=0|011+c4t=0|100+c5t=0|101+c6t=0|110+c7t=0|111 where ∑i=07cit=02=1. In order to evaluate the 3-tangle at time t from Eqs. (28)-(31), we
employ eqs. (19)-(27) where the initial coefficients
ci (t = 0) are
found in a random way. We perform the above procedure in three different cases and
calculate the respective 3-tangle in each one of the three different cases. In the
Appendix we write the three different random initial 3-qubit states employed in the
present work. In figure 6, we show the time evolution of the 3-tangle as a function
of both j and t associated to each of the three
different random initial 3-qubit states employed in the present work.
4 Relevance of Entanglement for Technological Applications
Quantum entanglement is essential not only for technological applications such as
quantum computation [13], data base search algorithm [14] or quantum
cryptography [15] and quantum secret sharing [16] but also for
non-artificial systems. For instance for photosynthesis [17]-[18], navigational
orientation of animals [19], the imbalance of matter and antimatter in the
universe [20] and evolution itself [21].
5 Random Initial 3-qubit States
We write the three different random initial 3-qubit states that we have employed in
the present work.
Such a states are the following:
ψ1t=0⋍0.0649682+0.480244i0+0.0820031+0.0744268i10.157695+0.567361i20.00990613+0.30057i30.159286+0.122371i40.136861+0.0406154i50.00576077+0.267818i60.424509+0.054595i7,
(32)
ψ2t=0⋍0.254723+0.452791i0+0.205806+0.3656i10.119695+0.452655i20.10712+0.095714i30.000551918+0.408866i40.0713835+0.0732269i50.0279167+0.0993365i60.316043+0.161424i7,
(33)
ψ3t=0⋍0.228717+0.66739i0+0.124412+0.62744i10.0241769+0.16416i20.00878132+0.0690814i30.0589419+0.165814i40.0255238+0.105097i50.0946251+0.0750734i60.00977502+0.0581965i7.
(34)
We observe that all of the above three 3-qubit states are normalized to unit.
6 Conclusions
We have studied the behavior in time of the 3-tangle associated to a 3-qubit system
interacting through the XY Hamiltonian given by Eqs. (5) and (8). The 3-tangle
associated to the state |ψt=c0t|000+c1t|001+c2t|010+c3t|011+c4t|100+c5t|101+c6t|110+c7t|111 is given by Eqs. (28)-(31) where each one of the coefficients cit i=0,1,…,7 depend on the random initial coefficients cjt=0 j=0,1,…,7, J and the time t as it can be seen
from Eqs. (18)-(27).
An important result obtained in the present work is that the entanglement of both the
W-state and the GHZ-state keeps constant in time providing the three qubits interact
through the XY Hamiltonian given by Eq. (5).
Such a result could have important experimental advantages whereas both the W-state
and the GHZ-state can be used on solid basis for testing different QIP
protocols.
In Figure we have plotted the 3-tangle of Eq.
(28) as a function of both the time t and the antiferromagnetic factor
J for three different random 3-qubit states. It is worth to
point out that the 3-tangle shows a noticeable periodic behavior as it is
appreciated from Figure being the respective
period t=4π/J. Such a behavior in time is a consequence of the harmonic structure of
the time evolution operator of Eq. (18).
Our results invoke to the present experimental facilities to measure the 3-tangle for
a system of 3-qubits by taking into account that for certain times the entanglement
disappears and that for other values of both the time and the antiferromagnetic
constant J such a quantity is maximal. The maximal values of the
3-tangle can be used for implementing Quantum Information Processing protocols where
entanglement is a resource. Our results might indicate that the 3-tangle associated
to a 3-qubit system resembles to a quantized physical quantity providing the three
qubits interact through a XY Hamiltonian.
References
1. Werner, R. (1989). Quantum states with
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model.
Phys. Rev. A, Vol. 40, 4277. DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277.
[ Links ]
2. Bennett, C.H., Bernstein, H., Popescu, S., &
Schumacher, B. (1996). Concentrating partial entanglement by local
operations. Phys. Rev. A, Vol. 53, 2046. DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2046.
[ Links ]
3. Bennett, C.H. , DiVincenzo, D., Smolin, J.A., &
Wootters, W.K. (1996). Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error
correction. Phys. Rev. A, Vol. 54, 3824. DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevA.54.3824.
[ Links ]
4. Coffman, V., Kundu J., & Wootters, W.K. (2000).
Distributed entanglement. Phys. Rev. A, Vol. 61, 052306. DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevA.61.052306.
[ Links ]
5. Dür, W., Vidal, G., & Cirac, J.J. (2000). Three
qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways. Phys. Rev. A,
Vol. 62, 062314. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.62.062314.
[ Links ]
6. Acin, A., Costa, A.A.L., Jane, E., Latorre, J., &
Tarrach, R. (2000). Generalized Schmidt Decomposition and
Classification of Three-Quantum-Bit States. Phys. Rev. Lett.
Vol. 85, 1560. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1560.
[ Links ]
7. Carteret, H. & Sudbery, A. (2000). Local
symmetry properties of pure 3-qubit states. J. Phys. A, Vol.
33, 4981. DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/33/28/303.
[ Links ]
8. Acin, A. , Adrianov, A., Jane, E. , & Tarrach, R.
(2001). Three-qubit pure-state canonical forms. J. Phys.
A, Vol. 31, 6725. DOI:
10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/301.
[ Links ]
9. Acin, A. , Bruss, D., Lewenstein, M., & Sanpera, A.
(2001). Classification of Mixed Three-Qubit States. Phys.
Rev. Lett., Vol. 87, 040401. DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.040401.
[ Links ]
10. Wei, T.C. & Goldbart, P.M. (2003). Geometric
measure of entanglement and applications to bipartite and multipartite quantum
states. Phys. Rev. A, Vol. 68, 042307. DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevA.68.042307.
[ Links ]
11. Levay, P. (2005). Mott insulator to superfluid
transition in the Bose-Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. A, Vol. 71,
012334. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.033629.
[ Links ]
12. Lieb, E., Schultz, T., & Mattis, D. (1961). Two
soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain. Ann. Phys. N.Y.,
Vol.16, 407. DOI: 10.1016/0003-4916(61)90115-4.
[ Links ]
13. Deutsch, D. (1989). Quantum computational networks.
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A., Vol. 425, 73. DOI:
10.1098/rspa.1989.0099.
[ Links ]
14. Avila, M. & Elizalde-Salas, J.B. (2017).
Remedies for the Inconsistences in the Times of Execution of the Unsorted
Database Search Algorithm within the Wave Approach. Computación y
Sistemas, Vol. 21, 883. DOI:
10.13053/cys-21-4-2367.
[ Links ]
15. Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H.
(2002). Quantum cryptography. Rev. Mod. Phys., Vol.
74, 145.
[ Links ]
16. Hillery, M., Buzek, V., & Berthiaume, A.
(1999). Quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A, Vol.
59, 1829. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.1829.
[ Links ]
17. Caruso, F., Chin, A. W., Datta, A., Huelga, S.F., &
Plenio, M.B. (2010). Entanglement and entangling power of the
dynamics in light-harvesting complexes. Phys. Rev. A, Vol. 81,
062346.
[ Links ]
18. Sarovar, M., Ishizaki, A., Fleming, G.R., & Whaley,
K.B. (2010). Quantum entanglement in photosynthetic light-harvesting
complexes. Nat. Phys., Vol. 6, 462. DOI:
10.1038/nphys1652.
[ Links ]
19. Cai, J., Guerreschi, G.G., & Briegel, H.J.
(2010). Quantum Control and Entanglement in a Chemical Compass.
Phys.Rev. Lett., Vol. 104, 220502. DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.220502.
[ Links ]
20. Hiesmayr, B.C. (2007). Nonlocality and entanglement
in a strange system. Eur. Phys. J. C, Vol. 50, 73. DOI:
10.1140/epjc/s10052-006-0199-x.
[ Links ]
21. McFadden, J. & Al-Khalili, J. (1999). A quantum
mechanical model of adaptive mutation. BioSystems, Vol. 50,
203.
[ Links ]