Objective

To explore regional differences in myocardial wall thickness (WT) among the most prevalent cardiomyopathies and in individuals without structural heart disease using cardiac magnetic resonance.

Methods

Patients older than 18 years referred to cardiac magnetic resonance during the period between January 2014 and September 2014, with a diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and myocarditis were retrospectively selected from our database.

Results

One hundred twenty patients patients were included. The control group had an average WT of 5.9 ± 1.1 mm, with a WT index of 2.9 ± 0.8. Significantly lower mean WT in the apical segments were identified in both the control group (basal 6.7 ± 1.3 vs. mid 6.0 ± 1.3 vs. apical 4.6 ± 1.0 mm, P < .0001) and in all evaluated cardiomyopathies (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: basal 10.5 ± 2.4 vs. mid 10.8 ± 2.7 vs. apical 7.3 ± 3.3 mm, P < .0001; idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: basal 7.7 ± 1.7 vs. mid 7.6 ± 1.3 vs. apical 5.4 ± 1.3 mm, P < .0001; ischemic cardiomyopathy: basal 7.4 ± 1.7 vs. mid 7.5 ± 1.9 vs. apical 5.5 ± 1.8 mm, P < .0001; myocarditis: basal 7.1 ± 1.5 vs. mid 6.4 ± 1.1 vs. apical 5.1 ± 0.8, P < .0001). Significant gender differences were also evident regarding the mean WT both in the control group (male 6.5 ± 2.1 vs. female 5.2 ± 1.7 mm, P < .0001), as in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (10.5 ± 5.3 vs. 8.5 ± 5.7 mm, P < .0001) and myocarditis (6.6 ± 2.0 vs. 5.2 ± 1.6 mm, P < .0001).

Conclusion

We found a relatively high prevalence of segments commonly deemed thinned among patients without structural heart disease. We also observed a marked asymmetry and longitudinal gradient in wall thickness both in controls and in the various cardiomyopathies evaluated.