SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.3 número5Análisis de una postura editorial: El caso de la reelección del presidente colombiano Álvaro Uribe VélezMovimientos transfronterizos México-Estados Unidos: Los polleros como agentes de movilidad índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


CONfines de relaciones internacionales y ciencia política

versão impressa ISSN 1870-3569

Resumo

SANCHEZ, Mónica Judith. The philosophy of subject and the sociology of knowledge in the theories of Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann. CONfines relacion. internaci. ciencia política [online]. 2007, vol.3, n.5, pp.87-98. ISSN 1870-3569.

In this article I show that, in spite of essential differences between Habermas and Luhmann with respect to the philosophy of the subject, they both depend on the modern idea of the individual self to pose their theories of meaning (Habermas 1989 and 1990, Luhmann 1998). Habermas and Luhmann belong to divergent theoretical schools (critical and functionalist respectively) and yet they both use essential lessons about language from the German "sciences of the spirit" (Geisteswissenschaften); the phenomenological perspective and the sociology of knowledge. Even though their positions on the value of the modern individual self are opposed, the latter is an essential element in the theoretical perspectives of both sociologists: Habermas describes the individual subject as a linguistically competent, rational, and critical entity; while Luhmann rejects this anthropocentric conception outright and contemplates society as a set of systems oriented towards their own functionality. Luhmann produces a very useful sociological perspective, but rhetorically rejects the substantive aspect of the philosophy of the subject without recognizing that his perspective depends on the consciousness of the subject that he rejects at the same time. In the light of this dilemma I argue that it is necessary to remember essential lessons from Max Weber's methodology of the social sciences.

Palavras-chave : Philosophy of the subject; meaning phenomenology; sociology of knowledge; functionalism; autopoiesis; social systems; critical school; communicative action.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons