SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.12 número2Gozona y fandango: fuentes de legitimidad de la alianza matrimonial en Yalálag, Oaxaca índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Península

versão impressa ISSN 1870-5766

Resumo

HERNANDEZ, Nalliely. Experts in Public Life: ¿Independent Elite Groups or Socialized Inquiry? A Contribution of Lippmann-Dewey's Debate in the Contemporary Context. Península [online]. 2017, vol.12, n.2, pp.169-199. ISSN 1870-5766.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsla.2017.06.008.

The aim of this writing is to analyze the epistemological background, mainly concerning the conception of science that underlies in the debate concerning public opinion between Walter Lippmann and John Dewey. Then, I will qualify the debate and show the advantages involved in Dewey's proposal. Finally, I will also point out the disadvantages of such a conception and suggest, as a result, a new point of view for the contemporaneous discussion concerning deliberative democracy.

Palavras-chave : democratic elitism; public opinion; scientific inquiry; deliberative democracy; pragmatism.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol