SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8 número4Respuesta de portainjertos de manzano a vigor, eficiencia de producción y concentraciones foliar y en fruto de NPKDeterminación de lisina, triptófano y proteína en germinados de maíz criollo y QPM índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

versão impressa ISSN 2007-0934

Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc vol.8 no.4 Texcoco Jun./Jul. 2017

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v8i4.13 

Articles

In vitro morphogenesis of Mammillaria plumose Weber

Janeth Téllez-Román2 

María Cristina Guadalupe López-Peralta1  § 

Eleodoro Hernández-Meneses2 

Andrés Adolfo Estrada Luna3 

Hilda Araceli Zavaleta Mancera4 

Manuel Livera Muñoz1 

1Posgrado en Recursos Genéticos y Productividad-Genética-Colegio de Postgraduados. Carretera México-Texcoco, km 36.5. Montecillo, Texcoco, Estado de México, México. CP. 56230.

2Posgrado en Recursos Genéticos y Productividad-Fisiología Vegetal-Colegio de Postgraduados. Carretera México-Texcoco, km 36.5. Montecillo, Texcoco, Estado de México, México. CP. 56230.

3 CINVESTAV-Unidad Irapuato-Departamento de Ingeniería Genética.

4Posgrado en Botánica-Colegio de Postgraduados. Carretera México-Texcoco, km 36.5. Montecillo, Texcoco, Estado de México. CP. 56230. Tel. 01(595) 9520200, ext. 1540.


Abstract

Mammillaria plumosa is a highly appreciated Mexican cactus as an ornamental plant for its peculiar morphology. Excessive extraction and looting of its wild populations have forced its protection and is currently classified as an endangered species. Given this critical situation this paper aimed at developing an efficient in vitro propagation system feasible to be implemented as a strategie for recovering the species. Stem segments with areolae were seeded in medium MS (1962), supplemented with 2,4-D (9, 13.5 and 18 μM) in combination with kinetin (4.6, 9.3 and 13.9 μM). All evaluated treatments induced callus formation but the activation of the areolae for conversion to shoots was only obtained with 18 μM of 2,4-D and 9.3 μM of kinetin. In the proliferation stage callus continued to grow at the same concentrations of growth regulators, shoot differentiation occurred from the areolar activation and differentiation of novo adventitious buds. Shoots formed roots naturally in the process but the rooting was improved with the culture in medium MS (1962) at half the concentration of salts. In the plants acclimatization the survival rate was 85% in substrate of peat and river sand. Using this protocol it is possible to establish the micropropagation of Mammillaria plumosa where 500 plants can be regenerated in an average of 24 weeks of culture, which could be used in restoring wild populations or for commercial use.

Keywords: barrel cactus; cactus; micropropagation; organ-genesis; 2,4-D

Resumen

Mammillaria plumosa es una cactácea mexicana altamente apreciada como planta ornamental por su peculiar morfología. La extracción desmedida y el saqueo de sus poblaciones silvestres han forzado su protección y actualmente se encuentra clasificada como una especie en peligro de extinción. Ante esta crítica situación el presente trabajo se planteó como objetivo desarrollar un sistema de propagación in vitro eficiente factible de implementarse como una de las estrategias para la recuperación de la especie. Segmentos de tallos con aréolas se sembraron en medio MS (1962), suplementado con 2,4-D (9, 13.5 y 18 µM) en combinación con cinetina (4.6, 9.3 y 13.9 µM). Todos los tratamientos evaluados indujeron la formación de callos pero la activación de las aréolas para su conversión en brotes solo se obtuvo con 18 µM de 2,4-D y 9.3 µM de cinetina. En la etapa de proliferación los callos continuaron su crecimiento en las mismas concentraciones de reguladores de crecimiento, la diferenciación de brotes se produjo a partir de la activación areolar y la diferenciación de brotes adventicios de novo. Los brotes formaron raíces de forma natural en el proceso pero el enraizamiento se mejoró con el cultivo en medio MS (1962) a la mitad de concentración de sales. En la aclimatación de plantas la tasa de supervivencia fue 85% en sustrato de turba y arena de río. Con este protocolo es posible establecer la micropropagación de Mammillaria plumosa donde se pueden regenerar un promedio 500 plantas en 24 semanas de cultivo, las cuales podrían servir en la restauración de poblaciones silvestres o para su aprovechamiento comercial.

Palabras clave: biznaga; cactácea; micropropagación; organogénesis; 2,4-D

Introduction

Mammillaria plumosa Weber is a native cactus from northern México, popularly known as biznaga, its barrel shape and its areolas arrangement give a cottony appearance that pretends to be covered by snow, which makes it attractive as an ornamental plant with a high commercial value (Arias et al., 2005). Cacti are a family whose distribution is restricted to the American continent (Bravo-Hollis and Scheinvar, 1999), except for Rhipsalis baccifera, distributed in tropical África (Anderson, 2001). Among the cacti diversity in Máxico there are 52 genera, representing 47% of the genera recognized for the family; at the species level 850 are reported in the wild, corresponding to 42% of all species (Arias-Montes, 1993). Official Mexican Norm 059 (NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010) classifies Mammillaria plumosa as an endangered species, so it could be in danger of disappearing in the short or medium term. Cactaceae can be used as food plants, live fences, cattle fodder and medicinal plants, but its use as ornamental plants is undoubtedly the most exploited, because of its striking flowers and the rare shapes of its stems (Jiménez and Jiménez, 2007).

Several factors encourage many species to be in some risk category. High demand for various uses has led to over-collecting species to the extent of threatening natural populations, mainly because many of them have high levels of endemism (Arias, 1993). High environmental specificity of species, very long life cycles and slow growth are other factors contributing to the slow recovery of its populations against naturally caused disturbances or by human activities (Jiménez, 2011).

In addition to the cacti protection (NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010), it is necessary to implement successful propagation techniques that allow its conservation and sustainable use. Propagation studies are critical because they offer the possibility of multiplying valuable plants through artificial methods that could significantly reduce the demand for wild source material.Cactaceae propagation can be accomplished through the plant tissue culturein vitro, vegetative propagation or seed germination (Rojas and Vázquez, 2000).

Conventional propagation methods are adequate but inefficient in terms of multiplication due to the slow growth and limited shoot production (Angulo and Paredes, 2011). Given the increasing market demand for ornamental plants and better understanding of the mechanisms that regulate the in vitro morphogenesis, micropropagation has become a key tool for the protection of threatened or endangered species and large-scale commercial production in the horticultural industry (Preil, 2003). In micropropagation of several species of cactaceae the most commonly used techniques have been the activation of axillary buds, regeneration of adventitious shoots and somatic embryogenesis (Lema and Kulus, 2014). Over the years these techniques have allowed to successfully micropropagate more than 600 varieties and 40 species of ornamental cactuses (Quiala et al., 2004; Ruvalcaba et al., 2010).

For the establishment of an in vitro propagation system of cacti various tissues or organs can be used as explants, whose choice depends on the genus and species. Terminal shoots of seedlings can be used (Gómez et al., 2006), lateral or vertical sections of cladodes (Estrada et al., 2002); simple areolas (Pérez y Dávila, 2002; Ramírez et al., 2007; Quiala et al., 2009); seeds (Dávila et al., 2005; De Madeiros et al., 2006) and flower buds (Wyka et al., 2006), among others, which are grown with different growth regulators (auxins, cytokinins and gibberellins) in accordance with the study objectives and desired morphogenic responses.

While the in vitro propagation of cacti has been efficiently achieved for various species, from the scientific point of view, the implementation of these protocols can not be generalized for all cactuses, since most of the morphogenic responses in vitro are influenced by the genotype. Therefore, the objective of this research was to establish the optimal conditions for an in vitro propagation system of Mammillaria plumosa Weber via indirect organogenesis and to determine the histological origin of callus and buds.

Materials and methods

Vegetal material

Healthy and vigorous seedlings grown under nursery conditions provided by the cactus management and utilization unit, Tepetlaoxtoc, Estado de México, with the UMA MX/VIV-CO-194.MX-SEMARNAT registration, were used.

Culture medium and incubation conditions

The basic culture medium used was Murashige and Skoog (MS, 1962) with complete inorganic salts, supplemented with sucrose (30 g L-1), myoinositol (100 mg L-1), thiamine (1 mg L-1) and solidified with agar (Merck®, 9 g L-1). The pH was adjusted to 5.7 with NaOH or HCl 1N and sterilization was performed in a vertical autoclave (AESA® Model 300) at 121 °C and 1.5 kg cm-2 pressure for 20 min. Cultures were maintained at 25 ±2 °C in photoperiod of 16 h and light intensity of 45 µmol m-2 s-1.

Aseptic culture establishment

Young explant donor plants, of 4 to 6 cm in diameter, were washed with detergent and tap water for 25 min, then rinsed six times with sterile distilled water. Immediately, a surface disinfection treatment was applied, which consisted in the immersion of the plants in a commercial sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl, cloralex®; 30% v/v) with stable colloidal silver (Microdyn®; 1.5% v/v) for 10 min and then rinsed six times with sterile distilled water. Subsequently, the plants were immersed in ethanol (70%) for 5 min and again six rinses with sterilized distilled water were applied.

Induction of shoots

Segments of 5-8 cm tuber length with areola were seeded in 45 mL capacity flasks with 15 mL of basic culture medium MS (1962) added with 2,4-D (9, 13.5 and 18 μM) combined with Kinetin (4.6, 9.3 and 13.9 μM) and medium without growth regulators as a control. After four weeks of culture, the formation of calli (%), sprouting (number of explants with shoots) and number of shoots per explant were quantified. The experimental design was completely random, where each treatment was represented by 10 replicates and the experimental unit was an areolar explant per flask.

Calli proliferation and shoot multiplication.

In order to promote the proliferation of shoots, the explants (shoots and calluses) were transferred to the same treatments used in the induction stage of shoots for 12 weeks, with subcultures every four weeks. At 4, 8 and 12 weeks the callus growth (measured as weight of fresh matter (mg), the number of novo organogenic shoots by explant; the number of sprouts per areolar activation per explant; novo shoot length and areolar activation (mm), the number of roots and root length (cm) were quantified. The experimental design was completely random where each treatment was represented by 10 repetitions and the experimental unit was an areolar explant per flask.

Rooting and acclimatization of plants

Shoots of 1-1.5 cm diameter were subcultured on MS medium (1962) to half concentration of mineral salts supplemented with sucrose (15 g L-1) for six weeks. When roots lengthened and constituted a root system with 3 to 5 roots, 40 plants with an average diameter of 1-1.5 cm were selected for acclimatization. Plants were extracted from the flasks; roots were washed with sterile distilled water and planted in polystyrene containers of 150 mL capacity. Two types of sterile substrates were evaluated: peat + river sand (1:1) and peat + leaf soil (1:1). The plants were covered with a polyethylene bag and placed in a growth chamber with photoperiod of 12 h light; temperature of 26 ±2 °C and irrigation with sterile distilled water every third day. At 30 and 60 days after transplantation, the survival percentage was quantified.

Histological analysis

The purpose of this analysis was to study the origin of the shoots and callus obtained during the induction and multiplication stages; at 10 weeks samples were taken from explants with organogenic areolar shoots and callus tissue. Samples were fixed in FAA; dehydrated in a series of ethanol gradients and processed for inclusion in paraffin (Ruzin, 1999). Using a rotary microtome (Spencer®) transverse and anticlines samples were obtained (10 μm) which were stained with safranin 0 and solid green FCF (Zavaleta and Engleman, 1994). Observations were made under a microscope (Axioskop 2 Plus, ZEISS®) and photomicrographs were taken with a digital camera (Axioskop MRC5, ZEISS®).

Statistic analysis

The obtained data were subjected to ANOVA with SAS statistical analysis package (SAS Institute, 2003) and for comparison of means Tukey test (p≤ 0.05) was used.

Results and discussion

Establishment of aseptic culture

The disinfection process used for the establishment of aseptic cultures of M. plumosa was efficient, since the survival rate of the explants was 90% (Figure 1a-b). The effectiveness of the disinfection process and eventual tissue damage of the explants are directly related to exposure time, disinfectant concentration, phytosanitary condition of donor plants, type, size and physiology of the explants and are critical factors during early stages of crops (George and Debergh, 2008) so that in M. plumosa finding a balance in these aspects was achieved. This stage is considered fundamental, since the presence of pollutants and the blackening of tissues negatively affect the morphogenic responses (Smith, 2013).

Figure 1 In vitro morphogenesis and histological analysis of M. plumosa . a) adult plant; b) areolar explant; c) regenerated callus and bud of apical areola with 2,4-D (18.0 μM) and kinetin (9.30 μM) at 60 days of culture; d) organogenic callus, areolar and organogenic bud after 90 days; e) initial stage 1, green callus; f) bud emergence at 60 days; g) intermediate stage 2 of the shoot; h) longitudinal section of the intermediate shoot at 90 days; i) stage 3 of the shoot; j) longitudinal section of the differentiated shoot at 120 days. ca= organogenic callus; bra= areolar shoot; bro= organogenic shoot; br= shoot; alm= starch; pa= parenchyma; proc= procambium; mab = apical meristem of bud; x= xylem; f= phloem; em= modified spines. 

Shoots induction

The concentrations of growth regulators in the culture medium had a significant effect on the observed morphogenic responses (p≤ 0.05). All combinations of growth regulators promoted indirect organogenesis in the explants, whereas direct organogenesis was only obtained in three treatments (Table 1).

Table 1 Effect of 2,4-D and kinetin in direct and indirect organogénesis of M. plumosa after four weeks of cultivation. 

¶= Medias con la misma letra en cada columna no son significativamente diferentes (Tukey, 0.05).

In indirect organogenesis the explants generated several types of calli, which varied in their coloration, texture and growth rate. The coloration varied from white to green and the consistency was firm and compact to friable (Figure 1c-d). Friable green calli originated and grew on the cut surface at the base of the explants, which is a response that matches observations in Mammillaria carmenae, since callus grown in the presence of 2,4-D showed a better appearance (Mata et al., 2001). In general, a marked tendency was observed for callus growth as the 2,4-D concentration in the culture medium increased. Treatments with 13.5 and 18 μM induced calli formation in 100% of the explants; however, the best results were obtained with the combination of 18 μM of 2,4-D and 9.3 μM of kinetin (Figure 1e-j).

These responses are similar to those reported in in vitro morphogenesis of other species of cactus, as Notocactus magnificus (De Medeiros et al., 2006), Opuntia spp. (Juárez and Passera, 2002; Estrada et al., 2008); Coryphantha retusa (Ruvalcaba-Ruiz et al., 2010); Turbinicarpus spp. (Dávila et al., 2005) and Mammillaria albicoma (Wyka et al., 2006). In vitro propagation of these species and various cacti have been successfully employed in different culture media (Vidican and Cachita, 2010) but the MS medium (1962) has been the most satisfactory. However, the desired morphogenic responses depend mainly on the type and concentration of growth regulator used, and this agrees with what was obtained in this research.

In callus differentiation in Mammillaria albicoma and Coryphantha retusa the best results were achieved with naphthaleneacetic acid with a concentration range of 2.6 and 26μM (Wyka et al., 2006; Ruvalcaba et al., 2010). The individual action of auxins or the combination with cytokinins and its concentrations determine the success of the organogenic responses observed during various propagation techniques (Quiala et al., 2004).

The shoots production at this stage of the process was the result of the activation of axillary buds present in the explants; however, it was only obtained with the combination of 2,4-D (18 μM) and kinetin (9.3 and 13.9 μM). These concentrations favored the regeneration of one to three shoots per explant, while the doses of 13.5 μM of 2,4-D and 4.6 μM of kinetin induced two shoots on average (Table 1). At this time the regeneration of shoots in indirect organogenesis was not observed. Although not all treatments that included kinetin achieved bud regeneration, it was observed that mean doses were able to break the latency of the axillary buds and activate the meristems of the areolas.

Calli proliferation and shoot multiplication

The buds and calli obtained in the callus and bud induction stage were subcultured three times (30, 60 and 90 days) in the same culture media to promote indirect organogenesis and shoot multiplication. All doses of auxin promoted callus proliferation (p≤ 05). The highest growth of calli with friable appearance was achieved with 18 μM of 2,4-D and 9.3 μM of kinetin; at 30 days of the subculture, its initial weight was tripled from 2 to 6 g. At 60 and 90 days of growth the growth rate was reduced and the callus reached a final average weight of 6.9 g (Table 1 and 2).

Table 2 Effect of 2,4-D and kinetin in the callus proliferation of M. plumosa after 30, 60 and 90 days culture. 

¶ = Medias con letra diferente entre columnas son diferentes; Tukey (p≤ 0.05).

Regarding to sprouting, it was observed that the regeneration of shoots took place from areolar activation, as happened in the induction cultures, and the differentiation of primordia shoot from indirect adventitious organogenesis derived from dedifferentiated cells. None of the treatments showed damage by hyperhydration, or darkening of tissue, and the new shoots showed a normal appearance.

The best response in areolar budding was obtained with 18 μM of 2,4-D and 9.3 μM of kinetin where the largest number of explants that generated shoot outbreaks was expressed and the average number of shoots per explant was 11.4 at 90 days (Table 3). As for organogenic outbreaks, these same concentrations of growth regulators favored the higher bud regeneration response in the three subculture periods (Table 4).

Table 3 Effect of 2,4-D and kinetin in areolar outbreaks multiplication of M. plumosa at 30, 60 and 90 days culture. 

¶= Medias con letra diferente entre columnas son diferentes; Tukey (p≤ 0.05).

Table 4 Effect of 2,4-D and kinetin in the multiplication of organogenic shoots of M. plumosa at 30, 60 and 90 days culture. 

¶= Medias con letra diferente entre columnas son diferentes; Tukey (p≤ 0.05).

The shoot regeneration responses obtained in this research are different from those reported for other cactus species. In Coryphantha elephantidens indirect organogenesis of shoots was achieved with 2.3μ M 2,4-D and 6.9 μ M kinetin (Wakhlu and Bhau, 2000), while in Opuntia ficus-indica regeneration was obtained with 2.26 µM of 2,4-D and 2.21 µM of BA with values of 2 to 3 shoots per explant (Angulo-Bejarano y Paredes-López, 2011), significantly lower amount than what was obtained in this research.

Activation of growth of areolar axillary buds of each explant of Mamillaria plumosa promoted by 2,4-D and kinetin can be considered high; however, in the regeneration of Pelecyphora aselliformis and P. strobiliformis cactus 13.7 and 12.3 shoots per explant were obtained, respectively, with 8.8 µM of BA (8.8) (Pérez and Dávila, 2002). Also, Mata et al. (2001) determined that higher shoot multiplication in Turbinicarpus laui was obtained with BA (8.8-13.32 µM) and naphthaleneacetic acid (0 - 2.68 µM).

In all morphogenic processes, the produced outbreaks number is genetically determined and is considered the main indicator of the multiplication potential of a species.The shoots amount reflects the number of potential adult plants and in this research, the average number of shoots that can be regenerated from an explant of M. plumosa is 537 approximately after 120 days of culture.

Histological analysis

The histological analysis allowed to characterize the origin and development of the shoots from the organogenic calli. Three stages identified as stage 1 (initial; 60 days); Stage 2 (intermediate, 90 days) and stage 3 (differentiated, 120 days) were observed. In the initial, the callus was formed by parenchyma cells, isodiametric thin-walled cells with starch grains. Subepidermal meristematic activity was also observed, which promoted the lifting of a globular protuberance, characterized by the differentiation of procambium in the central part (Figure 1e-f). In the intermediate stage, the callus turned a greener color and the number of shoots with a greater differentiation degree increased.

The formation of an apical meristem, differentiation of a juvenile areola, with spines primordia, irrigated by a xylem beam and differentiated and functional phloem was observed (Figure 1g-h). In the differentiated stage a callus appeared with numerous clearly differentiated green shoots (Figure 1i); the callus parenchyma developed numerous vascular bundles of anficribal type (external phloem and internal xylem) with branches oriented towards the buds. These shoots had modified spines in the center of the areola with mature vascular bundles (Figure 1j). Finally, the shoots grew and the base of the new shoot became thinner and detached from the callus and regenerate a new individual.

Rooting

In the multiplication stage, the areolar and organogenic novo shoots of Mammillaria plumosa naturally generated roots after 90 days of culture. Root formation in regenerated shoots throughout the morphogenic process represents an advantage compared to other species where a rooting stage with specific growth regulators is required to induce or improve the number and length of roots. However, the shoots were grown in MS basic medium (1962) without growth regulators to improve response. At four weeks of cultivation the shoots constituted a radical system with 2 to 4 roots on average.

In cactaceae it has been reported that, in general, are easy to root species both in vitro and in vivo conditions which, in the same way, can show differentiated adventitious roots without the presence of auxin. Davila-Figueroa et al. (2005) indicated that the in vitro rooting of buds of Turbinicarpus schmiedickeanus subsp. flaviflorus and T. subterraneus regenerated cacti (54-94%) was achieved in basic medium MS (1962) without growth regulators. In other species as Pilocereus robinii (Quiala et al., 2009) and Turbinicarpus laui (Mata et al., 2001) in vitro rooting (94-100%) was also effective in the basic medium MS (1962) but with half nutrient concentration. For Pilocereus aselliformis and P. strobiliformis the best rooting response (87-89%) was obtained with indole butyric acid or indoleacetic acid (Pérez and Dávila, 2002).

Acclimatization of plants

Fort the acclimatization stage, in vitro rooted shoots of Mammillaria feathery were used and planted in pots containing a proportional mixture (1:1) of peat and river sand. At 30 days the survival rate of the plants was 85%, which is an acceptable percentage. Acclimatization of plants of in vitro regenerated cacti, survival rates can be variable; 70% in Schlumbergera truncata, 88% in Pilocereus aselliformis and P. strobiliformis (Pérez and Dávila, 2002) and 94-100% in Turbinicarpus laui, Coryphantha elephantidens and Mammillaria carmenae (Mata et al., 2001; Coca et al., 2007).

Conclusions

A system for in vitro regeneration for Mammillaria plumosa via direct and indirect organogenesis was established from areolar explants. Morphogenesis was characterized by the differentiation of disorganized tissues or caulogenesis and the differentiation of organized structures or organs (direct and indirect organogenesis). The average number of shoots produced was 12 and the multiplication potential was 500 shoots on average after 20 weeks of cultivation, increasing the number of plants by increasing the number of subcultures. The regeneration of shoots for both routes was promoted by the combination of 18 μM of 2,4-D and 9.3 μM of kinetin, both in the induction and multiplication stages. The generation of adventitious roots for the production of complete plants was possible in a basic culture medium MS (1962) at half the concentration of total nutrients. The plants survival in the acclimatization was 85% in peat and river sand substrate (1:1). The developed system is efficient for mass propagation of Mammillaria plumosa and will help to meet the commercial demand for this species and its implementation on rescue strategies and conservation of wild populations.

Literatura citada

Anderson, E. F. 2001. The cactus familiy. Timber Press Inc. Portland, Oregon, USA. 776 p. [ Links ]

Angulo, B. P. I. and Paredes, L. O. 2011. Development of a regeneration protocol through indirect organogenesis in prickly pear cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill). Sci. Hortic. 128:283-288. [ Links ]

Arias, M. S. 1993. Cactáceas: conservación y diversidad en México. Rev. Soc. Mex. Hist. Nat. 44:109-115. [ Links ]

Arias, S.; Guzmán, U.; Mandujano, M. C.; Soto, G. M. and Golubov, J. 2005. Las especies mexicanas de cactáceas en riesgo de extinción. I. Una comparación entre los listados NOM-059-ECOL-2001 (México). La lista roja (UICN) y CITES. Cactáceas y Suculentas Mexicanas 50:100-110. [ Links ]

Bravo, H, H. y Scheinvar, L. 1999. El interesante mundo de las cactáceas. Fondo de Cultura Económica (FCE). UNAM. México. 233 p. [ Links ]

Coca, S. E.; Ortiz, M. J. G.; Sánchez, C. S. y Pérez, C. J. 2007. Efecto de la irradiación luminosa en la aclimatación de Mammillaria carmenae Castañeda (Cactaceae) proveniente de cultivo in vitro. Cactáceas y Suculentas Mexicanas. 72:101-108. [ Links ]

Davila, F. C. A.; De la Rosa, C. M. L. and Perez, M. B. E. 2005. In vitro propagation of eight species or subspecies of Turbinicarpus (Cactaceae). In vitro Cell Development Biology Plant. 41:540-545. [ Links ]

De Madeiros, L. A.; De Ribeiro, R. C. S.; Gallo, L. A.; De Oliveira, E. T. and Dematte, M. E. S. 2006. In vitro propagation of Notocactus magnificus. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 84:165-169. [ Links ]

Estrada, L. A. A.; López, P. C. and Cárdenas, S. E. 2002. In vitro micrografting and the histology of graft union formation of selected species of prickly pear cactus (Opuntia spp.). Sci. Hortic. 92:317-327. [ Links ]

Estrada, L. A. A.; Martínez, H. J. J.; Torres, T. M. E. and Chablé, M. F. 2008. In vitro micropropagation of the ornamental prickly pear cactus Opuntia lanigera Salm-Dyck. and effects of sprayed GA3 after transplantation to ex vitro conditions. Sci. Hortic. 117:378-385. [ Links ]

George E. F. and Debergh, P. C. 2008. Micropropagation: Uses and methods. In: George, E. F. (Eds.). Plant propagation by tissue culture. 3rd. Ed. Springer, Netherlands. 29-64 pp. [ Links ]

Gómez, J. J. L.; Morales, J. E.; Lechuga, C. J. A. y Cruz, S. F. 2006. Reproducción in vitro de garambullo Myrtillocactus geometrizans (Martius) Console. Cactáceas y Suculentas Mexicanas. 51:36-45. [ Links ]

Jiménez, F. A. y Jiménez, S. C. 2007. Uso y manejo de las cactáceas en la reserva de la biosfera barranca de Metztitlán, Hidalgo, México. Sitientibus Série Ciências Biológicas. 7:78-85. [ Links ]

Jiménez, S. C. 2011. Las cactáceas mexicanas y los riesgos que enfrentan. Revista Digital Universitaria. UNAM. 12:1-22. [ Links ]

Juárez, M. C. and Passera, C. B. 2002. In vitro propagation of Opuntia ellisiana Griff. and acclimatization to field conditions. Biocell 26:319-324. [ Links ]

Lema, R. J. and Kulus, D. 2014. Micropropagation of cacti-A review. Haseltonia. 19:46-63. [ Links ]

Mata, R. M.; Monroy, de la R. M.; Moebius, G. K. and Chavez, A. V. M. 2001. Micropropagation of Turbinicarpus laui Glass et Foster, an endemic and endangered species. In vitro Cell Developmental Biology Plant. 37:400-404. [ Links ]

Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tabacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum. 15:473-493. [ Links ]

Pérez, M. B. E. and Dávila, F. C. A. 2002. In vitro propagation of Pelecyphora aselliformis Ehrenberg and P. strobiliformis Werdermann. In vitro Cell Develop. Biol. Plant. 38:73-78. [ Links ]

Preil, W. 2003. Micropropagation of ornamental plants. In: Laimer, D. M. and Rücker, W. (Eds.). Plant Tissue Culture - 100 years since Gottlieb Haberlandt. Springer, Vienna. 115-133 pp. [ Links ]

Quiala, E.; Montalvo, G. y Matos, J. 2004. Empleo de la biotecnología vegetal para la propagación de cactáceas amenazadas. Biotecnología Vegetal. 4:195-199. [ Links ]

Quiala E.; Matos, J.; Montalvo, G.; De Feria, M.; Chávez, M.; Capote, A.; Pérez, N.; Barbón, R. and Kowalski, B. 2009. In vitro propagation of Pilosocereus robinii (Lemaire) Byles et Rowley, endemic and endangered cactus. Journal of the Professional Association for Cactus Development. 11:18-25. [ Links ]

Ramírez, M. R.; Aguilar, R. I.; Borodanenko, A.; Perez, M. L.; Barrera, G. J. L.; Nunez, P. H. G. and Ochoa, A. N. 2007. In vitro propagation of ten threatened species of Mammillaria (Cactaceae). In vitro Cell Developmental Biology Plant. 43:660-665. [ Links ]

Rojas, A. M. and Vázquez, Y. C. 2000. Cactus seed germination: a review. Journal of Arid Environments. 44:85-104. [ Links ]

Ruvalcaba, R. D.; Rojas, B. D. y Valencia, B. A. J. 2010. Propagación in vitro de Coryphanta retusa (Britton & Rose) un cactus endémico y amenazado. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 12:139-143. [ Links ]

Ruzin, S. E. 1999. Plant microtechnique microscopy. Oxford University Press. 322 p. [ Links ]

SAS Institute. 2003. The SAS system for windows. Release 9.1. SAS Institute. Cary, NC, USA. [ Links ]

SEMARNAT. 2010. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059- SEMARNAT-2010. Diario Oficial de la Federación (DOF). [ Links ]

Smith, R. 2013. Plant tissue culture: techniques and experiments. 3rd . Ed. Academic Press. USA. 188 p. [ Links ]

Vidican, T. I. and Cachita, C. D. 2010. Initiation of Opuntia fragilis var. fragilis in vitro cultures. Seria Stiinţele Vieţii. 20:35-40. [ Links ]

Wakhlu, A. K. and Bhau B. S. 2000. Callus formation and plant regeneration from tubercles of Coryphantha elephantidens (Lem.) Lem. In vitro Cell Developmental Biology Plant. 36:211-214. [ Links ]

Wyka, T.; Hamerska, M. and Wróblewska, M. 2006. Organogenesis of vegetative shoots from in vitro cultured flower buds of M. albicoma. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 87:27-32. [ Links ]

Zavaleta, M. H. A. and Engleman, E. M. 1994. Anatomy of the ovule and seed of Manilkara zapota (L.) Van Royen (Sapotaceae). Phytomorphology. 44:169-175. [ Links ]

Received: January 2017; Accepted: April 2017

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons