SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8 número41Estimación de la densidad forestal mediante imágenes Landsat ETM+ en la región sur del Estado de México índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de ciencias forestales

versão impressa ISSN 2007-1132

Rev. mex. de cienc. forestales vol.8 no.41 México Mai./Jun. 2017

 

Articles

Influence of climatic parameters on the population fluctuations of the complex Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman, 1868 and Dendroctonus mexicanus Hopkins, 1909

Víctor  López Gómez1 

Brenda  Torres Huerta2 

José Francisco  Reséndiz Martínez3 

Guillermo  Sánchez Martínez4 

Adriana Rosalía  Gijón Hernández3 

1Facultad de Ciencias. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. México.

2Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. México.

3Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Conservación y Mejoramiento de Ecosistemas Forestales. INIFAP. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias México. Correo-e: resendiz.francisco@inifap.gob.mx

4Campo Experimental Pabellón. CIR-Norte Centro. INIFAP. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias México.


Abstract:

Bark beetles are responsible for the loss of forest mass in Mexico as the second most important cause, so knowing the factors that increase the probability of active outbreaks will help make better decisions for their control. The objectives of the present work were to determine the influence of eight climatic parameters on the population fluctuations of Dendroctonus frontalis and Dendroctonus mexicanus in two municipalities of the Sierra Gorda of Querétaro state; as well as to design mathematical models of prediction. A ten-month monitoring showed that only six parameters (temperature, precipitation, atmospheric pressure, wind temperature, thermal sensation and temperature / humidity quotient) were related to the number of beetles of both species, which were only recognized just in one municipality, while relative humidity and wind speed had no effect. Thermal sensation and atmospheric pressure influenced the size of populations of D. frontalis, while cumulative rainfall did for D. mexicanus. It is concluded that there are atmospheric conditions which are associated with the numerical variations of bark beetles, in addition to those that are usually tested (temperature and humidity). The climatic components that explain the most important differences have a particular effect depending on the coleopteran species; finally, the distance of the meteorological station that registers them must be considered when interpreting such relation because it can generate a high uncertainty.

Key words: Temperate forest; bark beetles; aggregation pheromones; predictive models; monitoring; Lindgren traps

Resumen:

Los escarabajos descortezadores son los responsables de la pérdida de masa forestal en México como la segunda causa, por lo que conocer los factores que aumentan la probabilidad de brotes activos ayudará a tomar mejores decisiones para su control. Los objetivos del presente trabajo consistieron en determinar la influencia de ocho parámetros climatológicos sobre las fluctuaciones poblacionales de Dendroctonus frontalis y Dendroctonus mexicanus en dos municipios de la Sierra Gorda de Querétaro; así como elaborar modelos matemáticos de predicción. En un monitoreo de diez meses se observó que sólo seis parámetros (temperatura, precipitación, presión atmosférica, temperatura del viento, sensación térmica y cociente temperatura/humedad) se relacionan con el número de escarabajos de ambas especies, mismas que solo se reconocieron en un solo municipio; mientras que la humedad relativa y velocidad del viento no tuvieron ningún efecto. La sensación térmica y la presión atmosférica influyeron más en el tamaño de las poblaciones de D. frontalis, mientras que la precipitación acumulativa lo hizo para D. mexicanus. Se concluye que existen condiciones atmosféricas que se asocian con las variaciones numéricas de los escarabajos descortezadores, adicionales a las que por lo general se prueban (temperatura y humedad). Los componentes climáticos que explican las diferencias más importantes tienen un efecto particular en función de la especie del coleóptero; finalmente, la distancia de la estación meteorológica que los registra debe considerarse al interpretar tal relación pues puede generar una alta incertidumbre.

Palabras clave: Bosque templado; escarabajos descortezadores; feromonas de agregación; modelos predictivos; monitoreo; trampas Lindgren

Introduction

Pests and diseases are an important factor in the preservation of forest ecosystems. In Mexico, the average area with phytosanitary problems was 51 000 ha between 1999 and 2010, and one of the most important causal agents was barking beetles (mainly the Dendroctonus, Ips and Xyleborus genera) with 15 thousand ha infested in annual average (Díaz, 2005; Semarnat, 2012).

However, bark beetles are crucial in regenerating forest systems, since they naturally only attack and kill diseased trees or long-lived individuals, which keeps the forest in a healthy and productive state. Under certain conditions, the life cycles of these insects accelerate, causing populations to increase in size and become pests, leading to loss of large tracts of forest. Pest outbreaks of the Dendroctonus genus have intensified in recent years in several Mexican states especially in the north; in 2013 the area affected by these insects surpassed that damaged by forest fires (12 %) (McFarlane and Witson, 2008; Moore et al., Allard, 2009; CCMSS, 2012; Cuellar et al., 2012; Durán and Poloni, 2014).

Querétaro is one of the states where high infestations by barkers were recorded, mainly by Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman, 1868 and D. mexicanus Hopkins, 1909. In 2012 a phytosanitary contingency took place in several municipalities that belong to the Sierra Gorda Biosphere Reserve, with damage of approximately 71 000 m3 of wood (Cibrián et al., 2014).

The ecology of bark beetles is complex and dynamic, and in recent years, alternatives for prevention and management have been sought. Some studies have focused on determining the influence of climatological parameters on the increase of their populations in order to generate systems for forecasting epidemic situations, since it has been documented that populations of these barkers are regulated, in part, by the environmental conditions (Flores, 1977; Olivera, 2014).

However, there are currently few records and their results are contrasting, which makes it necessary to strengthen the evidences that show the main trends and to identify the climatic parameters that have a greater influence on the fluctuations of these beetles. In addition, this topic has become more relevant as an increase in the number of generations per year and an in the extent of these species due to climate change has been observed (Moore and Allard, 2009; Rivera et al., 2010; Bentz et al., 2010); thus, a better knowledge of the response of these insects to their abiotic environment will provide the elements to locate the areas of probable risk to the attack of debarkers, to elaborate scenarios and to take the necessary precautions.

Therefore, the objectives of this work were to determine the relation of eight climatic parameters (temperature, humidity, precipitation, atmospheric pressure, wind velocity, wind temperature, thermal sensation and the quotient between temperature and humidity), with D. frontalis and D. mexicanus on the basis of a 10-month monitoring in two municipalities of the Sierra Gorda de Querétaro Biosphere Reserve (Landa de Matamoros and Pinal de Amoles). It is intended to provide evidence to design predictive models in the future that may help to predict the appearance of active outbreaks for control actions. At present, the models that deal with the problem are very scarce, but there is the work of Cuellar et al. (2012) in which they described a mathematical model of this kind.

Materials and Methods

The study was carried out in pine forests of the Landa de Matamoros and Pinal de Amoles municipalities within the Sierra Gorda Biosphere Reserve of Querétaro, where Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. predominates. & Cham. and P. greggii Engelm. Three monitoring sites (i.e., La Gachupina, Camposanto and Tejamanil), and in Landa de Matamoros, two (Pinalito de la Cruz and El Madroño) (Figure 1) were selected in the municipality of Pinal de Amoles. The sites gather pine trees with stems larger than 15 cm of normal diameter and with infestation by bark insects of the D. mexicanus and D. frontalis complex.

EM1 = Tancoyol; EM2 = Landa de Matamoros; EM3 = Pinal de Amoles; EM4 = Puerta del Cielo; ZM1 = Landa de Matamoros; ZM2 = Pinal de Amoles.

Figure 1 Location of metheorological stations (EM) and monitoring zones (ZM) in Pinal de Amoles and Landa de Matamoros, Querétaro state municipalities. 

At each monitoring site, four 12-cone Lindgren funnel traps were set in which commercial aggregation pheromones (two with frontalin and two with endo-brevicomine) were randomly selected, as well as alpha-pinene for each case (Synergy). In the containers of each trap was placed a plastic strip of 2 cm impregnated with an insecticide of low toxicity composed by Geraniol (2.48 %) and Lavandin (1.86 %), to avoid the escape of the insects and to prevent their predation.

The monitoring consisted of biweekly collections for 10 months (from April 2014 to January 2015) and the baits were replaced every month and a half to maintain its attracting effect. The insects captured in the traps were preserved in 70 % alcohol and then transferred to the Laboratorio de Sanidad Forestal del Cenid-Comef (Cenid-Comef Forest Health Laboratory) (INIFAP), where the Dendroctonus genus bark beetles were counted and determined according to their morphology (Wood, 1963; Cibrián et al., 1995) and by the extraction of the seminal rod (Perusquía, 1978; Ríos et al., 2008). Only 10 % of the sample was determined when the number of insects exceeded 1 000 individuals. The abundance of D. frontalis and D. mexicanus was determined for each month from the biweekly records (with the sum of organisms collected from all traps).

The climate information comes from four meteorological stations and was provided by the Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (Conanp) de la Reserva de la Biósfera Sierra Gorda de Querétaro (National Commission of Protected Natural Areas (Conanp) of the Sierra Gorda de Querétaro Biosphere Reserve) (with records every 30 minutes) and from the Centro de Investigaciones del Agua Querétaro (CIAQ) of the Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro (Querétaro Water Research Center (CIAQ) of the Autonomous University of Querétaro) (with data per minute). The parameters that were taken into account were temperature, humidity, precipitation, atmospheric pressure, wind speed, wind temperature, thermal sensation, and the ratio of temperature to humidity (T / H); from each of one the average per month was determined, while the temperature / humidity quotient was calculated from the monthly averages. It should be noted that, due to technical failures of the meteorological stations, the complete data were not available, and therefore, the number of days per month varied between 8 and 31 (Table 1).

Table 1 Available months and days of the records from the metheorological stations of the Reserva de la Biósfera de la Sierra Gorda de Querétaro (Sierra Gorda de Querétaro Biosphere Reserve). 

Recorded Months Range of the recorded days Institution Metheorological station (municipality)
May, June, July, October, November and December 2014 and January 2015 10-31 Conanp Puerta del Cielo (Pinal de Amoles)
April, August and September 2014 9-31 CIAQ Poblado de Pinal de Amoles (Pinal de Amoles)
June, July, August, September and December 2014 12-28 Conanp Tancoyol (Landa de Matamoros)
April, May, October and November 2014 and January 2015 8-18 CIAQ Poblado de Landa de Matamoros (Landa de Matamoros)

This study included the largest possible number of atmospheric components, as they provide a more complete picture of the prevailing conditions. Thus, it is feasible to test the possible relationships between poorly used parameters and populations of bark beetles, since most of the works of this nature only handle temperature and humidity.

Beetle records of the localities of the municipality of Landa de Matamoros were associated with the meteorological stations of Tancoyol and the town of Landa de Matamoros, while the data of the localities of Pinal de Amoles were linked to the stations of Puerta del Cielo and the town of Pinal de Amoles.

Spearman correlation tests were performed for each municipality in order to determine the relationship between the abundances of D. frontalis and D. mexicanus with the eight climatic parameters of each month. A non-parametric test was used because the data did not have a normal distribution (Figure 2).

NS = Non-significant, *=<0.05; **=<0.01; ***=<0.001.

Figure 2 Correlations between the abundance of the Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman, 1868, Dendroctonus mexicanus Hopkins, 1909 complex and eight climatic parameters of Pinal de Amoles and Landa de Matamoros municipalities in the Sierra Gorda de Querétaro Biosphere Reserve. 

Subsequently, linear regression analyzes were performed (with a significance ANOVA test) only when correlations were significant (P <0.05). For each case, the data were transformed with the base 10 logarithm to obtain the different mathematical models (linear, logarithmic, exponential and potential). The best fit was determined from the coefficient of determination (R2) and the mathematical models with least squares technique.

Results

A total of 136 409 bark beetles were catched in both municipalities, from which 121 841 were D. frontalis and 14 568 D. mexicanus (Table 2).

Table 2 Number of individuals of each barking beetle species collected in the two municipalities of the Reserva de la Biósfera de la Sierra Gorda de Querétaro (Sierra Gorda de Querétaro Biosphere Reserve). 

In regard to the records of Pinal de Amoles, positive and significant correlations were found between temperature, wind temperature thermal sensation and T/H quotient with the abundance of both of the barking beetles (D. frontalis and D. mexicanus), as well as negative and significant with precipitation and atmospheric (figures 2 and 3). On the other hand, there were no significant relations between the abundance of the two species and two of the climatic parameters (humidity and wind speed).

Figure 3 Records of the Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman, 1868 and Dendroctonus mexicanus Hopkins, 1909 abundances in Pinal de Amoles (over a year) and the six climatic parameters of interest. 

From the significant regressions, the best mathematical models between the number of barking beetles and the climatic parameters were mainly of the potential and exponential type. For the first, it was verified between the temperature and the wind temperature for both species and the thermal sensation for the number of D. mexicanus. The exponential model was confirmed for both pest species when it was related to atmospheric pressure and precipitation, and only between the thermal sensation and the abundance of D. frontalis. Likewise, a single significant linear model was obtained between the registered D. frontalis individuals and the T/H ratio (Table 3). On the other hand, data from the Landa de Matamoros municipality did not show significant correlations of climatic parameters with both barking species (Figure 2 and Table 4).

Table 3 Results of the correlations between the abundance of the Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman, 1868 and Dendroctonus mexicanus Hopkins, 1909 complex and eight climatic parameters of Pinal de Amoles municipality, Sierra Gorda de Querétaro Biosphere Reserve. 

*Significance ANOVA was performed only in those significant Spearman correlations. NS = The model is not indicated because the regression was not significant.

Table 4 Results of the correlations between the abundance of the Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman, 1868 and Dendroctonus mexicanus Hopkins, 1909 complex and eight climatic parameters of Landa de Matamoros municipality, Sierra Gorda de Querétaro Biosphere Reserve. 

NS = The model is not indicated because the regression was not significant.

Discussion

The relationship between six environmental factors (temperature, precipitation, atmospheric pressure, wind temperature, thermal sensation and temperature / humidity quotient) and the abundances of two species of bark beetles of economic and environmental importance were confirmed (D. frontalis and D. mexicanus). However, it was only in Pinal de Amoles that significant correlations and mathematical models were confirmed, since in Landa de Matamoros no relation was verified, probably due to the great distance (21.70 ± 2.60 km) between the monitoring sites (El Madroño and Pinalito de la Cruz) and the meteorological stations (Landa de Matamoros and Tancoyol); this situation reduces the likelihood that the data will reflect the microclimatic conditions of the plots at the time of sampling. In contrast, the study sites located in the municipality of Pinal de Amoles (La Gachupina, Tejamanil and Campo Santo) are located at an average distance of 2.51 km (± 0.93 d.s.) to the meteorological stations of Puerta del Cielo and Pinal de Amoles.

The direct relationships obtained between the number of debarkers and the temperature-related parameters (mean temperature, mean wind temperature and mean thermal sensation) can be explained by the dependence of insect activities (i.e, dispersion, reproduction, development, growth, among others) to the environmental temperature, which influences its poikilothermic metabolism (Logan and Powell, 2001; Bentz et al., 2009; Dukes et al., 2009). However, in the case of Dendroctonus, contrasting results have been observed with the temperature with which a positive (Bentz, 2009; Hebertson and Jerkins, 2008) or non-significant relation has been recorded (Morales et al., 2016), which may be related to remoteness to meteorological stations, and is not specified in the above mentioned works.

The thermal sensation may be a better parameter to project the abundances of both barks (D. frontalis and D. mexicanus), since it explains a greater variation of the data (R2 = 0.84 and 0.57) in comparison with the temperature (R2 = 0.72 and 0.53) (Table 1). It is the result of the relation between the temperature and the wind speed, so it will present high values when the temperature is so and the wind speed low, and vice versa (Pasek, 1988). It appears to encompass two parameters that determine insect activity: on the one hand, temperature affects its metabolic rate, while wind velocity affects flight and its dispersion (Glick, 1939); this influence becomes more evident when organisms are as small as barkers (Compton, 2002). However, in this particular study, wind velocity did not explain the abundances of beetles (Table 1).

The inverse relationship between precipitation and abundance of both scolytes can be explained by the possible weakening of trees in their defense strategy, caused by water stress derived from a low precipitation or water availability; it can be reflected in the low resin production and lower capacity of the host to obstruct the entrance orifices and thus stop the infestation of the beetles (Powell and Logan, 2005; Rivera et al., 2010).

Regarding atmospheric pressure, Bennett and Borden (1971) mention that this parameter is associated with unstable weather conditions and may inhibit the dispersion of debarkers. It has been described that this behavior is perceived through beetle receivers (gas bubbles) that detect the short-term fluctuation of the barometric pressure of the environment (Geiger, 1966).

During periods of low pressure and transition in it, the highest wind speeds arise; changes in this sense are involved in the dispersal of the barking beetles, either to continue or to finish the flight (Chapman, 1967).

The T / H ratio was proportionally associated to the abundances of D. frontalis and D. mexicanus in Pinal de Amoles (Figure 1, Table 1) and it explained a variation of the data above 53 %, confirming that it is a good parameter to relate it to the fluctuation of such pests. However, it did not explain a greater variation of the data (R2) compared to that obtained with temperature for both species of beetles (Table 1), which coincides with the results of Cuellar et al. (2012). This suggests that this parameter should be used in future studies for the projection of the population fluctuations of D. frontalis and D. mexicanus, since this type of index is calculated with two parameters with great influence in the activities and development of the debarkers.

A relationship of bark abundance and atmospheric humidity was not found, consistent with other studies that show that this environmental variable has a low predictive capacity over population fluctuations of beetles (García et al., 2012). However, it has been proposed that the development of these insects is more related to subcortical moisture, since barkers are insects that spend most of their life cycle (immature stage) below the host bark (Íñiguez, 1999; Romero et al., 2007; Cuellar et al., 2012; Alvarado, 2013).

The mathematical models obtained were mostly exponential and potential (and there was only one linear), which suggests that the increase or decrease in the number of beetles is generally multiplicative as the climatic parameters change, which describes the nature of the relationship between these two types of variables.

From the frequent geographic overlap and coexistence in the same host, it is common to state that D. frontalis and D. mexicanus have the same ecological requirements (Zúñiga et al., 1995; Zúñiga et al., 1999; Salinas et al., 2004). However, these results show that the atmospheric pressure and the thermal sensation were the most influential parameters upon the population fluctuation of D. frontalis (from the R2 values obtained) (Table 1), while the cumulative precipitation was the factor that mostly affected the abundance of D. mexicanus. This suggests that these two species are different in regard to the physiological ideals with the abiotic factors of the environment that are tightly related with their development and success in the colonization of new sites (Zúñiga et al., 1995).

It is worth mentioning that the mathematical models (those significant) are strong for the species of beetles that were studied (D. frontalis and D. mexicanus) and for the place of study. And if they are tested in other ecosystems, they may vary in their prediction degree, since they show different trophic interactions of different intensity with their predators and preys, as well as not similar abiotic conditions.

This paper is the first intent to know the relation of a great number of climatic parameters in regard to the population fluctuations of bark beetles of commercial and environmental value, as well as to find the mathematical models that will help to make stronger predictions. However, it is necessary to count with greater evidences of this kind to confirm the tendencies, as well as to test them in contrasting conditions.

Conclusions

The climatic parameters are usually temperature and precipitation generally is associated with the population fluctuations of the debarking beetles as their influence over development and dispersal can be observed directly. However, there are other atmospheric conditions (atmospheric pressure, wind temperature thermal sensation and temperature/humidity quotient T/H), that have significant correlations with D. frontalis and D. mexicanus abundances, and that could explain a greater variation of the abundances of these beetles.

The distance of the meteorological stations with the sampling plots is a factor that must be weighed against the significance of the relations between the climatic parameters with the population fluctuations of D. frontalis and D. mexicanus, since they reduce the probability of reflecting the microclimate conditions at the time of data collection. Therefore, it is advisable to have meteorological stations near the monitoring site that record the atmospheric conditions of the locality, or, to put portable stations in the place.

Acknowledgements

The second author wishes to express her gratitude to the Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP) for the financial support lent for the performance of this work, that is part of the SIGI Project Number16433532511: “Generación de nuevas estrategias de monitoreo y control de los insectos descortezadores Dendroctonus mexicanus, Dendroctonus frontalis e Ips lecontei, mediante el uso de semioquímicos y entomopatógenos” (2014-2016).

To Biologist Samara Bocanegra Flores, Coordinator of PROCODES of CONANP and to Dr. Martín Alfonso Gutiérrez López, Director of CIAQ, of the Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, for providing the meteorological data bases. To Biologist Leonardo Escobar Betanzos for his support in office and field work.

REFERENCES

Alvarado V., O. 2013. Evaluación de los factores asociados a las infestaciones de descortezadores (Coleóptera: Scolytinae) en bosques de piñones (Pinus cembroides) en la Reserva de la Biosfera Sierra Gorda de Guanajuato. Tesis de Maestría. Centro Universitario. Querétaro, Qro., México. 58 p. [ Links ]

Bennett, B. R. and H. J. Borden. 1971. Flight arrestment of tethered Dendroctonus pseudotsugae and Trypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in response to olfactory stimuli. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 64(6): 1273-1286. [ Links ]

Bentz, B. J., J. Logan, J. MacMahon, C. D. Allen, M. Ayres, E. Berg, A. Carroll, M. Hansen, J. Hicke, L. Joyce, W. Macfarlane, S. Munson, J. Negrón, T. Paine, J. Powell, K. Raffa, J. Regniere, M. Reid, B. Romme, S. J. Seybold, D. Six, D. Tomback, J. Vandygriff, T. Veblen, M. White, J. Witcosky and D. Wood. 2009. Bark beetle outbreaks in western North America: Causes and consequences. Bark Beetle Symposium; Snowbird, Utah; November, 2005. University of Utah Press. November 15-18. Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 42 p [ Links ]

Bentz, J. B., R. Jacques, C. J. Fetting, H. E. Matthew, J. L. Hayes, J. A. Hicke, K. G. Rick, J. F. Negrón and S. J. Steven. 2010. Climate change and bark beetles of the Western United States and Canada: direct and indirect effects. BioScience 60:602-613. [ Links ]

Chapman, J. A. 1967. Response behaviour of scolytid beetles and odour meteorology. The Canadian Entomologist 99 (11): 1132-1137. DOI: 10.4039/Ent991132-11 [ Links ]

Cibrián T., D., J. T. Méndez M., R. Campos B., H. O. Yates y J. Flores L. 1995. Insectos forestales de México. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Secretaría de Agricultura y Recursos Hidráulicos, United States Departament of Agriculture, Natural Resources Canadá y Comisión Forestal de América del Norte. Chapingo, Edo. de Méx., México. 455 p. [ Links ]

Cibrián, T. D., S. F. Quiñonez A. y J. B. Morales. 2014. Diagnóstico de la situación actual de insectos en los bosques templados de México. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, División de Ciencias Forestales. Chapingo, Edo. de Méx., México. 313 p. [ Links ]

Compton, G. S. 2002. Sailing with the wind: Dispersal by small flying insects. ln: Bullock, K. M., R. E. Kenward and H. S. Rosie (eds.). 2002. Dispersal ecology. Chapter 6: Blackwell Publishing Company. Hoboken, NJ, USA. pp. 113-133. [ Links ]

Consejo Civil Mexicano para la Silvicultura Sostenible (CCMSS). 2012. Un nuevo enfoque para combatir la tala y el comercio de madera ilegal en México. Nota 33. < http://www.ccmss.org.mx /> (2 de enero de 2016). [ Links ]

Cuellar, R. G., A. M. Equihua, E. Estrada, T. M. Méndez, J. C. Villa y J. N. Romero. 2012. Fluctuación poblacional de Dendroctonus mexicanus Hopkins atraídos a trampas en el noreste de México y su correlación con variables climáticas. Boletín del Museo de Entomología de la Universidad del Valle 13(2): 12-19. [ Links ]

Díaz N., V. 2005. Uso de semioquímicos para el manejo y monitoreo de escarabajos descortezadores (Dendroctonus spp.) del pino, en la Sierra Fría, Aguascalientes. Tesis de Maestría. Centro de Ciencias Agropecuarias. Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes. Aguascalientes, Ags., México. 94 p. [ Links ]

Dukes, J. S., J. Pontius, D. Orwig, J. R. Garnas, V. L. Rodgers, N. Brazee, B. Cooke, K. A. Theoharides, E. E. Stange, R. Harrington, J. Ehrenfeld, J. Gurevitch, M. Lerdau, K. Stinson, R. Wick and M. Ayres. 2009. Responses of insect pests, pathogens, and invasive plant species to climate change in the forests of northeastern North America: what can we predict? Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39: 231-248. [ Links ]

Durán, E. y A. Poloni. 2014. Escarabajos descortezadores: diversidad y saneamiento en bosques de Oaxaca. Biodiversitas: 7-12. [ Links ]

García L., A., E. Micó and E. Galante. 2012. From lowlands to highlands: searching for elevational patterns of species richness and distribution of scarab beetles in Costa Rica. Diversity and Distributions 18: 543-553. [ Links ]

Geiger, R. 1966. The climate near the ground. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA, USA. 611 p. [ Links ]

Glick, P. A. 1939. The distribution of insects, spiders, and mites in the air. US Department of Agriculture. Technical Bulletin Num. 673. Washington, DC USA. 151 p. [ Links ]

Hebertson, E. G. and M. J. Jerkins. 2008. Climate factors associated with historic spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) outbreaks in Utah and Colorado. Environmental Entomology 37(2): 281-292. [ Links ]

Íñiguez H., G. 1999. Sistemas de clasificación de riesgo para Dendroctonus frontalis y D. mexicanus en el Manzano, en Villa de Santiago, Nuevo León, México. Tesis de Maestría. Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. Linares, NL., México. 84p. [ Links ]

Logan, J. A. and J. A. Powell. 2001. Ghost forests, global warming, and the mountain pine beetle. American Entomologist 47:160-173. [ Links ]

McFarlane, B. L. and D. O. Witson. 2008. Perceptions of ecological risk associated with mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) infestations in Banff and Kootenay National Parks of Canada. Risk Analysis (28): 203-212. [ Links ]

Moore, B. et G. Allard. 2009. Les impacts du changement climatique sur la santé des forêts. Département des forêts, Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’Alimentation et l’Agriculture (FAO). Rome, Italie. 194p. [ Links ]

Morales R., A., V. H. Cambrón S., S. Vergara P. y J. A. Obregón Z. 2016. Fluctuación poblacional de Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman, 1868 y Dendroctonus mexicanus Hopkins, 1909 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) y su asociación con variables climáticas en bosques de pino en el municipio de Landa de Matamoros, Querétaro, México. Entomología Mexicana 3: 633−638. [ Links ]

Olivera, L. N. 2014. Fluctuación poblacional de Dendroctonus mexicanus Hopkins y variación estacional de la temperatura y humedad relativa, en San Juan del Estado, Etla, Oaxaca. Tesis de Maestría en Ciencias. Instituto de Enseñanza e Investigación en Ciencias Agrícolas. Colegio de Postgraduados. Montecillo, Edo. de Méx., México. 73 p. [ Links ]

Pasek, E. J. 1988. Influence of wind and wind breaks on local dispersal of insects. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22/23: 539-554. [ Links ]

Perusquía, O. J. 1978. Descortezador de los pinos Dendroctonus spp.: taxonomía y distribución. SARH, SFF, Dirección General de Investigación y Capacitación Forestal. México, D.F., México. Boletín Técnico Núm. 55. 31 p. [ Links ]

Powell, J. A. and A. J. Logan. 2005. Insect seasonality: circle map analysis of temperature- driven life cycles. Theoretical Population Biology 67: 161-179. [ Links ]

Ríos R., A. V., J.Valdez C. and A. M. Equihua. 2008. Identification of Dendroctonus frontalis (Zimmermann) and D. mexicanus (Hopkins) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) through structures of the female Gennitalia. The Coleopterist Bulletin 62: 99-103. [ Links ]

Rivera, R. M., B. Locatelli y R. Billings. 2010. Cambio climático y eventos epidémicos del gorgojo descortezador del pino Dendroctonus frontalis en Honduras. Forest Systems 19(1): 70-76. [ Links ]

Romero L., S., P. O. Romón, C. I. Bilbao y A. G. Lafuente. 2007. Los escolítidos de las coníferas del país Vasco: guía práctica para su identificación y control. Administración de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco, Departamento de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. Bilbao, España. 189 p. [ Links ]

Salinas M., Y., M. G. Mendoza, M. A. Barrios, R. Cisneros, J. E. Macías S. and G. Zúñiga. 2004. Aerography of the genus Dendroctonus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in Mexico. Journal of Biogeography 31:1163-1177. [ Links ]

Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Semarnat). 2012. Sistema de Información Ambiental y de Recursos Naturales. < http://www.semarnat.gob.mx/informacionambiental/Pages/sniarn.aspx > (5 de enero de 2016). [ Links ]

Wood, S. L. 1963. A revision of bark beetle genus Dendroctonus Erichson (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Great Basin Natural Park 23: 1-117. [ Links ]

Zúñiga, G., R. Cisneros y. Y. Salinas. 1995. Coexistencia de Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman y D. mexicanus Hopkins (Coleóptera: Scolytidae) sobre un mismo hospedero. Acta Zoológica Mexicana 64: 59-62. [ Links ]

Zúñiga, G., G. Mendoza C., R. Cisneros y Y. Salinas M. 1999. Zonas de sobreposición en las áreas de distribución geográfica de las especies mexicanas de Dendroctonus Erichson (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) y sus implicaciones ecológico-evolutivas. Acta Zoológica Mexicana 77:1-22. [ Links ]

Received: May 04, 2016; Accepted: April 08, 2017

Conflict of interests The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Contribution by autor Víctor López Gómez: field work, advice in statistical analysis; Brenda Torres Huerta: field work, office work, taxonomic analysis, data base handling and writing of the manuscript; José Francisco Reséndiz Martínez: field work, office work, and review of the manuscript; Guillermo Sánchez Martínez: experimental design, field work, review and editing of the manuscript; Adriana Rosalía Gijón Hernández: field work, review and editing of the manuscript

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons