SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.78 número1Repercusión de la diabetes tipo 2 en la clasificación TNM de pacientes con cáncer renalEfecto de la electroestimulación percutánea del nervio tibial en pacientes con enuresis monosintomática. Experiencia inicial en México índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de urología

versão On-line ISSN 2007-4085versão impressa ISSN 0185-4542

Resumo

GIL-VILLA, SA et al. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Rev. mex. urol. [online]. 2018, vol.78, n.1, pp.9-18.  Epub 16-Dez-2021. ISSN 2007-4085.  https://doi.org/10.24245/revmexurol.v78i1.1674.

Background:

Twenty to 30% of prostate cancer patients present with high-risk disease. Treatment is controversial and the trend today is toward multimodal management, with radical prostatectomy as the initial step.

Objective:

To report the results of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Materials and methods:

A retrospective, descriptive, observational, and longitudinal study was conducted on patients with at least one high-risk criterion (prostate-specific antigen ≥ 20 ng/mL, clinical stage ≥ T2c and/or Gleason score ≥ 8) that underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Preoperative and perioperative variables were evaluated, along with the oncologic and functional follow-up data, and measures of central tendency were used for the statistical analysis with the SPSS program.

Results:

Of the 128 case records retrieved, 21 of those patients met at least one high-risk criterion. The most common criterion was a Gleason score > 8 (52.4%). Mean patient age was 68.9 years; prostate-specific antigen, 19 ng/mL; surgery duration, 300.2 min; blood loss, 494.8 mL; and transfusion rate, 4.8%. The complication rate was 33%; hospital stay, 6.9 days; time with catheter, 13.9 days; positive surgical margins, 47.6%; biochemical recurrence, 28.6%; adjuvant therapy, 38.1%; and preserved continence and erectile function were 58.8 and 47%, respectively, at month 12 of follow-up.

Conclusions:

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is a safe, minimally invasive procedure, with low morbidity and satisfactory perioperative and functional results. Additional studies and long-term follow-up are required.

Palavras-chave : Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic-assisted surgery.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol