SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número13El enfoque argumentativo de Manuel Atienza y la teoría estándar: dos problemas y un ensayo de solución¿“Inferencia científica” vs. “razonamiento jurídico”? -¡no tan rápido! índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Problema anuario de filosofía y teoría del derecho

versão On-line ISSN 2448-7937versão impressa ISSN 2007-4387

Resumo

FERNANDEZ, José Ángel. Reconstructing Principles of Criminal Law in Constitutional Review. Probl. anu. filos. teor. derecho [online]. 2019, n.13, pp.161-191.  Epub 19-Maio-2020. ISSN 2448-7937.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487937e.2019.13.13719.

Fundamental principles of criminal law theory lack a normative-structural analysis. Atienza´s and Ruiz Manero´s proposal in regards to legal decisions contain a typology of mandatory norms (rules, principles in a broad sense and directives) that is especially suitable for an analytical reconstruction of principles of criminal law. This proposal is also relevant and useful in the field of constitutional courts’ decisions related to Criminal law, because the prin-ciple or test of proportionality in its strict sense classifies fundamental rights into rules and principles. My aim in this paper is to discuss and propose a groundwork for normative reconstruction of the principles of criminal law using Atienza’s and Ruiz Manero’s framework.

Palavras-chave : Fundamental Principles of Criminal Law; Constitutional Review of Criminal Law; Principles and Legal Rules..

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol