SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.92 número1Comparación de los resultados quirúrgicos en pacientes obesos y no obesos sometidos a cirugía de columna lumbar abiertaResultados clínicos y urodinámicos en divertículos vesicales primarios pediátricos: un estudio comparativo índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Cirugía y cirujanos

versão On-line ISSN 2444-054Xversão impressa ISSN 0009-7411

Resumo

HERRADOR-BENITO, Jorge; PARAMO-ZUNZUNEGUI, Javier; RODRIGUEZ-CARAVACA, Gil  e  DURAN-POVEDA, Manuel. Pre-incisional local infiltration with levobupivacaine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized and clinical trial. Cir. cir. [online]. 2024, vol.92, n.1, pp.69-76.  Epub 07-Maio-2024. ISSN 2444-054X.  https://doi.org/10.24875/ciru.230000221.

Objective:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), despite its minimally invasive nature, requires effective control of post-operative pain. The use of local anesthetics (LA) has been studied, but the level of evidence is low, and there is little information on important parameters such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or return to work. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.50% levobupivacaine infiltration of incisional sites in reducing POP after LC.

Methods:

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Patients undergoing elective LC were randomized into two groups: no infiltration (control group) and port infiltration (intervention group). POP intensity (numerical rating scale, NRS), need for rescue with opioid drugs, PONV incidence, HRQoL, and return to work data, among others, were studied.

Results:

Two hundred and twelve patients were randomized and analyzed: 105 (control group) and 107 (intervention group). A significant difference was observed in the NRS values (control group mean NRS score: 3.41 ± 1.82 vs. 2.56 ± 1.96) (p < 0.05) and in the incidence of PONV (31.4% vs. 19.6%) (p = 0.049).

Conclusions:

Levobupivacaine infiltration is safe and effective in reducing POP, although this does not lead to a shorter hospital stay and does not influence HRQoL, return to work, or overall patient satisfaction.

Palavras-chave : Local anesthesia; Levobupivacaine; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Pain; Randomized clinical trial.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )