SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.4 número3Eventos de intrusión patógena en sistemas de distribución de agua potableComparación morfodinámica de la costa noroeste del estado de Quintana Roo, México índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Tecnología y ciencias del agua

versão On-line ISSN 2007-2422

Resumo

DEVORA-ISIORDIA, Germán Eduardo; GONZALEZ-ENRIQUEZ, Rodrigo  e  RUIZ-CRUZ, Saúl. Evaluation of desalination processes and their development in Mexico. Tecnol. cienc. agua [online]. 2013, vol.4, n.3, pp.27-46. ISSN 2007-2422.

Different desalination processes exist, which are differentiate by their cost, environmental impact, the quality of the product and energy consumption. A comparison of thermal and membrane processes identified the existing technologies to desalinate seawater, the number of installed plants, the technology used, the supply source and the use of desalinated water. The technical feasibility and main objective of this work was the study and comparison of thermal and membrane desalination systems with respect to production costs in USD/m3 and energy consumption in kWh/m3. Desalination systems have been in practice since 1970 with the use of membrane systems (reverse osmosis (RO), electrodialysis (ED) and nanofiltration (NF)) and thermal systems (multiple stage distillation (MED), multiple stage flash distillation (MSF), and solar distillation (SD)). Of the 13,000 plants installed, 50% use RO, 33% use NF, 1% MSD and 4% MSF. The most common supply sources are seawater (60%) and brackish water (22%). The beneficiaries of this desalinated water are the municipal (66%) and the industrial (23%) sectors. The type of technology that requires less energy consumption is RO, from 2 to 2.8 kWh/m3 at a cost of 0.6 USD/m3, whereas MSD and MSF technologies consume 3.4 to 4 kWh/m3 and 5 to 8 kWh/m3 at a production cost of 1.5 USD/m3 and 1.10 USD/m3, respectively. The comparison of technologies determined that energy consumption and production costs are less and production is greater with RO. Moreover, RO has significant advantages over other systems, such as not requiring phase changes, unlike MED and MSF. Reverse osmosis is the most feasible process with regard to production, energy consumption and cost.

Palavras-chave : reverse osmosis; electrodialysis; distillation; desalination; water quality; cations; anions.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons